Comparative efficacy of passive and mechanical fan-pad cooling system for microclimate modification and welfare in broiler production
Efficacy of passive cooling vis-à-vis mechanical fan-pad cooling system was assessed for microclimate modification to alleviate heat stress and improving growth performance and welfare of broilers. Cooling treatments comprised of Tc (control without any cooling system), TJSC passive cooling (jute s...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Indian Council of Agricultural Research
2016-07-01
|
Series: | Indian Journal of Animal Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAnS/article/view/59955 |
_version_ | 1797742057780936704 |
---|---|
author | S S CHIB A SHARMA Y SINGH A P S SETHI A L SAINI C SINGH |
author_facet | S S CHIB A SHARMA Y SINGH A P S SETHI A L SAINI C SINGH |
author_sort | S S CHIB |
collection | DOAJ |
description |
Efficacy of passive cooling vis-à-vis mechanical fan-pad cooling system was assessed for microclimate modification to alleviate heat stress and improving growth performance and welfare of broilers. Cooling treatments comprised of Tc (control without any cooling system), TJSC passive cooling (jute sheet roof shading and curtains with gravity flow sprinklers), TGSC passive cooling (green sheet roof shadings and curtains with gravity flow sprinklers) and TFP (fan pad mechanical cooling systems). The results of shed microclimate indicated that maximum ambient temperature, temperature humidity index (THI) and duration and level of heat stress in control were significantly higher than passive (TJSC and TGSC) and mechanical (TFP) cooling group. Growth performance and feed efficiency, in both passive (TJSC and TGSC) and mechanical cooling (TFP) were significantly better than control. However, growth performance and feed efficiency of chicks was significantly higher in TFP than chicks in passive (TJSC and TGSC) cooling groups. In passive cooling systems (TJSC and TGSC), the plasma catalase, glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and BUN were significantly lower than control (Tc) but significantly higher than mechanical cooling (TFP) system. The stress related behavioural activities, panting, preening, scratching and wing flapping were significantly higher in control as than in cooling system. It was concluded that passive cooling system can be an environment friendly and energy independent alternate to intensive mechanical cooling system to reduce heat stress and improve growth and welfare in broiler production.
|
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T14:35:33Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-bd4e46a106814dde8ac71eeecc095c4e |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0367-8318 2394-3327 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T14:35:33Z |
publishDate | 2016-07-01 |
publisher | Indian Council of Agricultural Research |
record_format | Article |
series | Indian Journal of Animal Sciences |
spelling | doaj.art-bd4e46a106814dde8ac71eeecc095c4e2023-08-17T09:10:35ZengIndian Council of Agricultural ResearchIndian Journal of Animal Sciences0367-83182394-33272016-07-0186710.56093/ijans.v86i7.59955Comparative efficacy of passive and mechanical fan-pad cooling system for microclimate modification and welfare in broiler productionS S CHIB0A SHARMA1Y SINGH2A P S SETHI3A L SAINI4C SINGH5Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Science University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004 IndiaGuru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Science University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004 IndiaGuru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Science University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004 IndiaGuru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Science University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004 IndiaGuru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Science University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004 IndiaGuru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Science University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004 India Efficacy of passive cooling vis-à-vis mechanical fan-pad cooling system was assessed for microclimate modification to alleviate heat stress and improving growth performance and welfare of broilers. Cooling treatments comprised of Tc (control without any cooling system), TJSC passive cooling (jute sheet roof shading and curtains with gravity flow sprinklers), TGSC passive cooling (green sheet roof shadings and curtains with gravity flow sprinklers) and TFP (fan pad mechanical cooling systems). The results of shed microclimate indicated that maximum ambient temperature, temperature humidity index (THI) and duration and level of heat stress in control were significantly higher than passive (TJSC and TGSC) and mechanical (TFP) cooling group. Growth performance and feed efficiency, in both passive (TJSC and TGSC) and mechanical cooling (TFP) were significantly better than control. However, growth performance and feed efficiency of chicks was significantly higher in TFP than chicks in passive (TJSC and TGSC) cooling groups. In passive cooling systems (TJSC and TGSC), the plasma catalase, glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and BUN were significantly lower than control (Tc) but significantly higher than mechanical cooling (TFP) system. The stress related behavioural activities, panting, preening, scratching and wing flapping were significantly higher in control as than in cooling system. It was concluded that passive cooling system can be an environment friendly and energy independent alternate to intensive mechanical cooling system to reduce heat stress and improve growth and welfare in broiler production. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAnS/article/view/59955Broiler welfareHeat stressMechanical coolingMicroclimate modificationPassive cooling |
spellingShingle | S S CHIB A SHARMA Y SINGH A P S SETHI A L SAINI C SINGH Comparative efficacy of passive and mechanical fan-pad cooling system for microclimate modification and welfare in broiler production Indian Journal of Animal Sciences Broiler welfare Heat stress Mechanical cooling Microclimate modification Passive cooling |
title | Comparative efficacy of passive and mechanical fan-pad cooling system for microclimate modification and welfare in broiler production |
title_full | Comparative efficacy of passive and mechanical fan-pad cooling system for microclimate modification and welfare in broiler production |
title_fullStr | Comparative efficacy of passive and mechanical fan-pad cooling system for microclimate modification and welfare in broiler production |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative efficacy of passive and mechanical fan-pad cooling system for microclimate modification and welfare in broiler production |
title_short | Comparative efficacy of passive and mechanical fan-pad cooling system for microclimate modification and welfare in broiler production |
title_sort | comparative efficacy of passive and mechanical fan pad cooling system for microclimate modification and welfare in broiler production |
topic | Broiler welfare Heat stress Mechanical cooling Microclimate modification Passive cooling |
url | https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAnS/article/view/59955 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sschib comparativeefficacyofpassiveandmechanicalfanpadcoolingsystemformicroclimatemodificationandwelfareinbroilerproduction AT asharma comparativeefficacyofpassiveandmechanicalfanpadcoolingsystemformicroclimatemodificationandwelfareinbroilerproduction AT ysingh comparativeefficacyofpassiveandmechanicalfanpadcoolingsystemformicroclimatemodificationandwelfareinbroilerproduction AT apssethi comparativeefficacyofpassiveandmechanicalfanpadcoolingsystemformicroclimatemodificationandwelfareinbroilerproduction AT alsaini comparativeefficacyofpassiveandmechanicalfanpadcoolingsystemformicroclimatemodificationandwelfareinbroilerproduction AT csingh comparativeefficacyofpassiveandmechanicalfanpadcoolingsystemformicroclimatemodificationandwelfareinbroilerproduction |