Comparative efficacy of passive and mechanical fan-pad cooling system for microclimate modification and welfare in broiler production

Efficacy of passive cooling vis-à-vis mechanical fan-pad cooling system was assessed for microclimate modification to alleviate heat stress and improving growth performance and welfare of broilers. Cooling treatments comprised of Tc (control without any cooling system), TJSC passive cooling (jute s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S S CHIB, A SHARMA, Y SINGH, A P S SETHI, A L SAINI, C SINGH
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Indian Council of Agricultural Research 2016-07-01
Series:Indian Journal of Animal Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAnS/article/view/59955
_version_ 1797742057780936704
author S S CHIB
A SHARMA
Y SINGH
A P S SETHI
A L SAINI
C SINGH
author_facet S S CHIB
A SHARMA
Y SINGH
A P S SETHI
A L SAINI
C SINGH
author_sort S S CHIB
collection DOAJ
description Efficacy of passive cooling vis-à-vis mechanical fan-pad cooling system was assessed for microclimate modification to alleviate heat stress and improving growth performance and welfare of broilers. Cooling treatments comprised of Tc (control without any cooling system), TJSC passive cooling (jute sheet roof shading and curtains with gravity flow sprinklers), TGSC passive cooling (green sheet roof shadings and curtains with gravity flow sprinklers) and TFP (fan pad mechanical cooling systems). The results of shed microclimate indicated that maximum ambient temperature, temperature humidity index (THI) and duration and level of heat stress in control were significantly higher than passive (TJSC and TGSC) and mechanical (TFP) cooling group. Growth performance and feed efficiency, in both passive (TJSC and TGSC) and mechanical cooling (TFP) were significantly better than control. However, growth performance and feed efficiency of chicks was significantly higher in TFP than chicks in passive (TJSC and TGSC) cooling groups. In passive cooling systems (TJSC and TGSC), the plasma catalase, glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and BUN were significantly lower than control (Tc) but significantly higher than mechanical cooling (TFP) system. The stress related behavioural activities, panting, preening, scratching and wing flapping were significantly higher in control as than in cooling system. It was concluded that passive cooling system can be an environment friendly and energy independent alternate to intensive mechanical cooling system to reduce heat stress and improve growth and welfare in broiler production.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T14:35:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bd4e46a106814dde8ac71eeecc095c4e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0367-8318
2394-3327
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T14:35:33Z
publishDate 2016-07-01
publisher Indian Council of Agricultural Research
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Animal Sciences
spelling doaj.art-bd4e46a106814dde8ac71eeecc095c4e2023-08-17T09:10:35ZengIndian Council of Agricultural ResearchIndian Journal of Animal Sciences0367-83182394-33272016-07-0186710.56093/ijans.v86i7.59955Comparative efficacy of passive and mechanical fan-pad cooling system for microclimate modification and welfare in broiler productionS S CHIB0A SHARMA1Y SINGH2A P S SETHI3A L SAINI4C SINGH5Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Science University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004 IndiaGuru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Science University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004 IndiaGuru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Science University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004 IndiaGuru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Science University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004 IndiaGuru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Science University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004 IndiaGuru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Science University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004 India Efficacy of passive cooling vis-à-vis mechanical fan-pad cooling system was assessed for microclimate modification to alleviate heat stress and improving growth performance and welfare of broilers. Cooling treatments comprised of Tc (control without any cooling system), TJSC passive cooling (jute sheet roof shading and curtains with gravity flow sprinklers), TGSC passive cooling (green sheet roof shadings and curtains with gravity flow sprinklers) and TFP (fan pad mechanical cooling systems). The results of shed microclimate indicated that maximum ambient temperature, temperature humidity index (THI) and duration and level of heat stress in control were significantly higher than passive (TJSC and TGSC) and mechanical (TFP) cooling group. Growth performance and feed efficiency, in both passive (TJSC and TGSC) and mechanical cooling (TFP) were significantly better than control. However, growth performance and feed efficiency of chicks was significantly higher in TFP than chicks in passive (TJSC and TGSC) cooling groups. In passive cooling systems (TJSC and TGSC), the plasma catalase, glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and BUN were significantly lower than control (Tc) but significantly higher than mechanical cooling (TFP) system. The stress related behavioural activities, panting, preening, scratching and wing flapping were significantly higher in control as than in cooling system. It was concluded that passive cooling system can be an environment friendly and energy independent alternate to intensive mechanical cooling system to reduce heat stress and improve growth and welfare in broiler production. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAnS/article/view/59955Broiler welfareHeat stressMechanical coolingMicroclimate modificationPassive cooling
spellingShingle S S CHIB
A SHARMA
Y SINGH
A P S SETHI
A L SAINI
C SINGH
Comparative efficacy of passive and mechanical fan-pad cooling system for microclimate modification and welfare in broiler production
Indian Journal of Animal Sciences
Broiler welfare
Heat stress
Mechanical cooling
Microclimate modification
Passive cooling
title Comparative efficacy of passive and mechanical fan-pad cooling system for microclimate modification and welfare in broiler production
title_full Comparative efficacy of passive and mechanical fan-pad cooling system for microclimate modification and welfare in broiler production
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy of passive and mechanical fan-pad cooling system for microclimate modification and welfare in broiler production
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy of passive and mechanical fan-pad cooling system for microclimate modification and welfare in broiler production
title_short Comparative efficacy of passive and mechanical fan-pad cooling system for microclimate modification and welfare in broiler production
title_sort comparative efficacy of passive and mechanical fan pad cooling system for microclimate modification and welfare in broiler production
topic Broiler welfare
Heat stress
Mechanical cooling
Microclimate modification
Passive cooling
url https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAnS/article/view/59955
work_keys_str_mv AT sschib comparativeefficacyofpassiveandmechanicalfanpadcoolingsystemformicroclimatemodificationandwelfareinbroilerproduction
AT asharma comparativeefficacyofpassiveandmechanicalfanpadcoolingsystemformicroclimatemodificationandwelfareinbroilerproduction
AT ysingh comparativeefficacyofpassiveandmechanicalfanpadcoolingsystemformicroclimatemodificationandwelfareinbroilerproduction
AT apssethi comparativeefficacyofpassiveandmechanicalfanpadcoolingsystemformicroclimatemodificationandwelfareinbroilerproduction
AT alsaini comparativeefficacyofpassiveandmechanicalfanpadcoolingsystemformicroclimatemodificationandwelfareinbroilerproduction
AT csingh comparativeefficacyofpassiveandmechanicalfanpadcoolingsystemformicroclimatemodificationandwelfareinbroilerproduction