Non-invasive sensing techniques to phenotype multiple apple tree architectures

Tree fruit architecture results from combination of the training system and pruning and thinning processes across multiple growth and development years. Further, the tree fruit architecture contributes to the light interception and improves tree growth, fruit quality, and fruit yield, in addition to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chongyuan Zhang, Sara Serra, Juan Quirós-Vargas, Worasit Sangjan, Stefano Musacchi, Sindhuja Sankaran
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-03-01
Series:Information Processing in Agriculture
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214317321000184
_version_ 1797704881451040768
author Chongyuan Zhang
Sara Serra
Juan Quirós-Vargas
Worasit Sangjan
Stefano Musacchi
Sindhuja Sankaran
author_facet Chongyuan Zhang
Sara Serra
Juan Quirós-Vargas
Worasit Sangjan
Stefano Musacchi
Sindhuja Sankaran
author_sort Chongyuan Zhang
collection DOAJ
description Tree fruit architecture results from combination of the training system and pruning and thinning processes across multiple growth and development years. Further, the tree fruit architecture contributes to the light interception and improves tree growth, fruit quality, and fruit yield, in addition to easing the process of orchard management and harvest. Currently tree architectural traits are measured manually by researchers or growers, which is labor-intensive and time-consuming. In this study, the remote sensing techniques were evaluated to phenotype critical architectural traits with the final goal to assist tree fruit breeders, physiologists and growers in collecting architectural traits efficiently and in a standardized manner. For this, a consumer-grade red–green–blue (RGB) camera was used to collect apple tree side-images, while an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) integrated RGB camera was programmed to image tree canopy at 15 m above ground level to evaluate multiple tree fruit architectures. The sensing data were compared to ground reference data associated with tree orchard blocks within three training systems (Spindle, V-trellis, Bi-axis), two rootstocks (‘WA 38 trees grafted on G41 and M9-Nic29) and two pruning methods (referred as bending and click pruning). The data were processed to extract architectural features from ground-based 2D images and UAV-based 3D digital surface model. The traits extracted from sensing data included box-counting fractal dimension (DBs), middle branch angle, number of branches, trunk basal diameter, and tree row volume (TRV). The results from ground-based sensing data indicated that there was a significant (P < 0.0001) difference in DBs between Spindle and V-trellis training systems, and correlations between DBs with tree height (r = 0.79) and total fruit yield per unit area (r = 0.74) were significant (P < 0.05). Moreover, correlations between average or total TRV and ground reference data, such as tree height and total fruit yield per unit area, were significant (P < 0.05). With the reported findings, this study demonstrated the potential of sensing techniques for phenotyping tree fruit architectural traits.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T05:26:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bd5c3db50e5f45d0bbde05cfa65aa206
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2214-3173
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T05:26:59Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Information Processing in Agriculture
spelling doaj.art-bd5c3db50e5f45d0bbde05cfa65aa2062023-09-03T07:17:56ZengElsevierInformation Processing in Agriculture2214-31732023-03-01101136147Non-invasive sensing techniques to phenotype multiple apple tree architecturesChongyuan Zhang0Sara Serra1Juan Quirós-Vargas2Worasit Sangjan3Stefano Musacchi4Sindhuja Sankaran5Department of Biological Systems Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USATree Fruit Research &amp; Extension Center, Washington State University, Wenatchee, WA 98801, USA; Department of Horticulture, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USADepartment of Biological Systems Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USADepartment of Biological Systems Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USATree Fruit Research &amp; Extension Center, Washington State University, Wenatchee, WA 98801, USA; Department of Horticulture, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USADepartment of Biological Systems Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA; Corresponding author.Tree fruit architecture results from combination of the training system and pruning and thinning processes across multiple growth and development years. Further, the tree fruit architecture contributes to the light interception and improves tree growth, fruit quality, and fruit yield, in addition to easing the process of orchard management and harvest. Currently tree architectural traits are measured manually by researchers or growers, which is labor-intensive and time-consuming. In this study, the remote sensing techniques were evaluated to phenotype critical architectural traits with the final goal to assist tree fruit breeders, physiologists and growers in collecting architectural traits efficiently and in a standardized manner. For this, a consumer-grade red–green–blue (RGB) camera was used to collect apple tree side-images, while an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) integrated RGB camera was programmed to image tree canopy at 15 m above ground level to evaluate multiple tree fruit architectures. The sensing data were compared to ground reference data associated with tree orchard blocks within three training systems (Spindle, V-trellis, Bi-axis), two rootstocks (‘WA 38 trees grafted on G41 and M9-Nic29) and two pruning methods (referred as bending and click pruning). The data were processed to extract architectural features from ground-based 2D images and UAV-based 3D digital surface model. The traits extracted from sensing data included box-counting fractal dimension (DBs), middle branch angle, number of branches, trunk basal diameter, and tree row volume (TRV). The results from ground-based sensing data indicated that there was a significant (P < 0.0001) difference in DBs between Spindle and V-trellis training systems, and correlations between DBs with tree height (r = 0.79) and total fruit yield per unit area (r = 0.74) were significant (P < 0.05). Moreover, correlations between average or total TRV and ground reference data, such as tree height and total fruit yield per unit area, were significant (P < 0.05). With the reported findings, this study demonstrated the potential of sensing techniques for phenotyping tree fruit architectural traits.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214317321000184Tree training systemsTree row volumeUnmanned aerial vehicleImage analysis
spellingShingle Chongyuan Zhang
Sara Serra
Juan Quirós-Vargas
Worasit Sangjan
Stefano Musacchi
Sindhuja Sankaran
Non-invasive sensing techniques to phenotype multiple apple tree architectures
Information Processing in Agriculture
Tree training systems
Tree row volume
Unmanned aerial vehicle
Image analysis
title Non-invasive sensing techniques to phenotype multiple apple tree architectures
title_full Non-invasive sensing techniques to phenotype multiple apple tree architectures
title_fullStr Non-invasive sensing techniques to phenotype multiple apple tree architectures
title_full_unstemmed Non-invasive sensing techniques to phenotype multiple apple tree architectures
title_short Non-invasive sensing techniques to phenotype multiple apple tree architectures
title_sort non invasive sensing techniques to phenotype multiple apple tree architectures
topic Tree training systems
Tree row volume
Unmanned aerial vehicle
Image analysis
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214317321000184
work_keys_str_mv AT chongyuanzhang noninvasivesensingtechniquestophenotypemultipleappletreearchitectures
AT saraserra noninvasivesensingtechniquestophenotypemultipleappletreearchitectures
AT juanquirosvargas noninvasivesensingtechniquestophenotypemultipleappletreearchitectures
AT worasitsangjan noninvasivesensingtechniquestophenotypemultipleappletreearchitectures
AT stefanomusacchi noninvasivesensingtechniquestophenotypemultipleappletreearchitectures
AT sindhujasankaran noninvasivesensingtechniquestophenotypemultipleappletreearchitectures