A Win for LGBT Rights in Namibia
<p>In the recent case of Digashu and Seiler-Lilles the Namibian Supreme Court held that denying the recognition of same-sex spouses under the Immigration Control Act 1993 was not only a violation of the right to dignity under the Namibian Constitution, but also amounted to unfair discriminatio...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH
2023-05-01
|
Series: | Verfassungsblog |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://verfassungsblog.de/a-win-for-lgbt-rights-in-namibia/ |
_version_ | 1797817180563177472 |
---|---|
author | Mahima Balaji |
author_facet | Mahima Balaji |
author_sort | Mahima Balaji |
collection | DOAJ |
description | <p>In the recent case of Digashu and Seiler-Lilles the Namibian Supreme Court held that denying the recognition of same-sex spouses under the Immigration Control Act 1993 was not only a violation of the right to dignity under the Namibian Constitution, but also amounted to unfair discrimination. While limited in scope, the judgement is a win for the rights of LGBTQIA+ persons in a jurisdiction where they remain mostly unrecognized. It is also notable for its use of comparativism as a deliberative resource. </p>
|
first_indexed | 2024-03-13T08:49:29Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-bd5eec31fb8c42f58ddf212f90106a94 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2366-7044 |
language | deu |
last_indexed | 2024-03-13T08:49:29Z |
publishDate | 2023-05-01 |
publisher | Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH |
record_format | Article |
series | Verfassungsblog |
spelling | doaj.art-bd5eec31fb8c42f58ddf212f90106a942023-05-29T17:03:12ZdeuMax Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbHVerfassungsblog2366-70442023-05-012366-7044A Win for LGBT Rights in NamibiaMahima Balaji<p>In the recent case of Digashu and Seiler-Lilles the Namibian Supreme Court held that denying the recognition of same-sex spouses under the Immigration Control Act 1993 was not only a violation of the right to dignity under the Namibian Constitution, but also amounted to unfair discrimination. While limited in scope, the judgement is a win for the rights of LGBTQIA+ persons in a jurisdiction where they remain mostly unrecognized. It is also notable for its use of comparativism as a deliberative resource. </p> https://verfassungsblog.de/a-win-for-lgbt-rights-in-namibia/constitutional comparativism, LGBT Rights, Namibia, Same Sex Marriage |
spellingShingle | Mahima Balaji A Win for LGBT Rights in Namibia Verfassungsblog constitutional comparativism, LGBT Rights, Namibia, Same Sex Marriage |
title | A Win for LGBT Rights in Namibia |
title_full | A Win for LGBT Rights in Namibia |
title_fullStr | A Win for LGBT Rights in Namibia |
title_full_unstemmed | A Win for LGBT Rights in Namibia |
title_short | A Win for LGBT Rights in Namibia |
title_sort | win for lgbt rights in namibia |
topic | constitutional comparativism, LGBT Rights, Namibia, Same Sex Marriage |
url | https://verfassungsblog.de/a-win-for-lgbt-rights-in-namibia/ |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mahimabalaji awinforlgbtrightsinnamibia AT mahimabalaji winforlgbtrightsinnamibia |