A Win for LGBT Rights in Namibia

<p>In the recent case of Digashu and Seiler-Lilles the Namibian Supreme Court held that denying the recognition of same-sex spouses under the Immigration Control Act 1993 was not only a violation of the right to dignity under the Namibian Constitution, but also amounted to unfair discriminatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mahima Balaji
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH 2023-05-01
Series:Verfassungsblog
Subjects:
Online Access:https://verfassungsblog.de/a-win-for-lgbt-rights-in-namibia/
_version_ 1797817180563177472
author Mahima Balaji
author_facet Mahima Balaji
author_sort Mahima Balaji
collection DOAJ
description <p>In the recent case of Digashu and Seiler-Lilles the Namibian Supreme Court held that denying the recognition of same-sex spouses under the Immigration Control Act 1993 was not only a violation of the right to dignity under the Namibian Constitution, but also amounted to unfair discrimination. While limited in scope, the judgement is a win for the rights of LGBTQIA+ persons in a jurisdiction where they remain mostly unrecognized. It is also notable for its use of comparativism as a deliberative resource. </p>
first_indexed 2024-03-13T08:49:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bd5eec31fb8c42f58ddf212f90106a94
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2366-7044
language deu
last_indexed 2024-03-13T08:49:29Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH
record_format Article
series Verfassungsblog
spelling doaj.art-bd5eec31fb8c42f58ddf212f90106a942023-05-29T17:03:12ZdeuMax Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbHVerfassungsblog2366-70442023-05-012366-7044A Win for LGBT Rights in NamibiaMahima Balaji<p>In the recent case of Digashu and Seiler-Lilles the Namibian Supreme Court held that denying the recognition of same-sex spouses under the Immigration Control Act 1993 was not only a violation of the right to dignity under the Namibian Constitution, but also amounted to unfair discrimination. While limited in scope, the judgement is a win for the rights of LGBTQIA+ persons in a jurisdiction where they remain mostly unrecognized. It is also notable for its use of comparativism as a deliberative resource. </p> https://verfassungsblog.de/a-win-for-lgbt-rights-in-namibia/constitutional comparativism, LGBT Rights, Namibia, Same Sex Marriage
spellingShingle Mahima Balaji
A Win for LGBT Rights in Namibia
Verfassungsblog
constitutional comparativism, LGBT Rights, Namibia, Same Sex Marriage
title A Win for LGBT Rights in Namibia
title_full A Win for LGBT Rights in Namibia
title_fullStr A Win for LGBT Rights in Namibia
title_full_unstemmed A Win for LGBT Rights in Namibia
title_short A Win for LGBT Rights in Namibia
title_sort win for lgbt rights in namibia
topic constitutional comparativism, LGBT Rights, Namibia, Same Sex Marriage
url https://verfassungsblog.de/a-win-for-lgbt-rights-in-namibia/
work_keys_str_mv AT mahimabalaji awinforlgbtrightsinnamibia
AT mahimabalaji winforlgbtrightsinnamibia