Deep Transfer Learning for Land Use and Land Cover Classification: A Comparative Study

Efficiently implementing remote sensing image classification with high spatial resolution imagery can provide significant value in land use and land cover (LULC) classification. The new advances in remote sensing and deep learning technologies have facilitated the extraction of spatiotemporal inform...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Raoof Naushad, Tarunpreet Kaur, Ebrahim Ghaderpour
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-12-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/23/8083
_version_ 1797507167509544960
author Raoof Naushad
Tarunpreet Kaur
Ebrahim Ghaderpour
author_facet Raoof Naushad
Tarunpreet Kaur
Ebrahim Ghaderpour
author_sort Raoof Naushad
collection DOAJ
description Efficiently implementing remote sensing image classification with high spatial resolution imagery can provide significant value in land use and land cover (LULC) classification. The new advances in remote sensing and deep learning technologies have facilitated the extraction of spatiotemporal information for LULC classification. Moreover, diverse disciplines of science, including remote sensing, have utilised tremendous improvements in image classification involving convolutional neural networks (CNNs) with transfer learning. In this study, instead of training CNNs from scratch, the transfer learning was applied to fine-tune pre-trained networks Visual Geometry Group (VGG16) and Wide Residual Networks (WRNs), by replacing the final layers with additional layers, for LULC classification using the red–green–blue version of the EuroSAT dataset. Moreover, the performance and computational time are compared and optimised with techniques such as early stopping, gradient clipping, adaptive learning rates, and data augmentation. The proposed approaches have addressed the limited-data problem, and very good accuracies were achieved. The results show that the proposed method based on WRNs outperformed the previous best results in terms of computational efficiency and accuracy, by achieving 99.17%.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T04:44:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bd6bd6f1bea748fca597f0257604c140
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T04:44:47Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-bd6bd6f1bea748fca597f0257604c1402023-11-23T03:03:44ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202021-12-012123808310.3390/s21238083Deep Transfer Learning for Land Use and Land Cover Classification: A Comparative StudyRaoof Naushad0Tarunpreet Kaur1Ebrahim Ghaderpour2Accubits Invent—Artificial Intelligence R&D Lab, Accubits Technologies Inc., Trivandrum 695581, IndiaDepartment of Biomedical Science, Acharya Narendra Dev College, University of Delhi, Delhi 110019, IndiaDepartment of Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, CanadaEfficiently implementing remote sensing image classification with high spatial resolution imagery can provide significant value in land use and land cover (LULC) classification. The new advances in remote sensing and deep learning technologies have facilitated the extraction of spatiotemporal information for LULC classification. Moreover, diverse disciplines of science, including remote sensing, have utilised tremendous improvements in image classification involving convolutional neural networks (CNNs) with transfer learning. In this study, instead of training CNNs from scratch, the transfer learning was applied to fine-tune pre-trained networks Visual Geometry Group (VGG16) and Wide Residual Networks (WRNs), by replacing the final layers with additional layers, for LULC classification using the red–green–blue version of the EuroSAT dataset. Moreover, the performance and computational time are compared and optimised with techniques such as early stopping, gradient clipping, adaptive learning rates, and data augmentation. The proposed approaches have addressed the limited-data problem, and very good accuracies were achieved. The results show that the proposed method based on WRNs outperformed the previous best results in terms of computational efficiency and accuracy, by achieving 99.17%.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/23/8083land use classificationland cover classificationremote sensingsatellite imageryEuroSATearth observation
spellingShingle Raoof Naushad
Tarunpreet Kaur
Ebrahim Ghaderpour
Deep Transfer Learning for Land Use and Land Cover Classification: A Comparative Study
Sensors
land use classification
land cover classification
remote sensing
satellite imagery
EuroSAT
earth observation
title Deep Transfer Learning for Land Use and Land Cover Classification: A Comparative Study
title_full Deep Transfer Learning for Land Use and Land Cover Classification: A Comparative Study
title_fullStr Deep Transfer Learning for Land Use and Land Cover Classification: A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Deep Transfer Learning for Land Use and Land Cover Classification: A Comparative Study
title_short Deep Transfer Learning for Land Use and Land Cover Classification: A Comparative Study
title_sort deep transfer learning for land use and land cover classification a comparative study
topic land use classification
land cover classification
remote sensing
satellite imagery
EuroSAT
earth observation
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/23/8083
work_keys_str_mv AT raoofnaushad deeptransferlearningforlanduseandlandcoverclassificationacomparativestudy
AT tarunpreetkaur deeptransferlearningforlanduseandlandcoverclassificationacomparativestudy
AT ebrahimghaderpour deeptransferlearningforlanduseandlandcoverclassificationacomparativestudy