Adjudicative Bilateralism and Community Interests

The purpose of this essay is to explore the two main ways in which community interests have been taken into account in international adjudication. First, special procedural tools have been devised in order to accommodate the multilateral dimension of certain disputes into the traditionally bilateral...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Beatrice I. Bonafé
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2021-01-01
Series:AJIL Unbound
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2398772321000167/type/journal_article
_version_ 1811157372440150016
author Beatrice I. Bonafé
author_facet Beatrice I. Bonafé
author_sort Beatrice I. Bonafé
collection DOAJ
description The purpose of this essay is to explore the two main ways in which community interests have been taken into account in international adjudication. First, special procedural tools have been devised in order to accommodate the multilateral dimension of certain disputes into the traditionally bilateral scheme of international adjudication. It will be shown that such tools have been of little use for the protection of community interests. Second, legal relations engendered by community interests have been conceptualized in a bilateral manner so that they could fit adjudicative bilateralism. It may seem counterintuitive, but it will be maintained that this second avenue offers the most concrete, yet not entirely satisfactory, means to adjudicate community interests. Finally, the essay argues that the Monetary Gold rule proves a useful test to properly understand the different logic of these two avenues.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T05:06:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bd7de4e73ea9486b9193b0dd2289d89f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2398-7723
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T05:06:24Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series AJIL Unbound
spelling doaj.art-bd7de4e73ea9486b9193b0dd2289d89f2023-03-09T12:27:09ZengCambridge University PressAJIL Unbound2398-77232021-01-0111516416910.1017/aju.2021.16Adjudicative Bilateralism and Community InterestsBeatrice I. Bonafé0Professor of International Law, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.The purpose of this essay is to explore the two main ways in which community interests have been taken into account in international adjudication. First, special procedural tools have been devised in order to accommodate the multilateral dimension of certain disputes into the traditionally bilateral scheme of international adjudication. It will be shown that such tools have been of little use for the protection of community interests. Second, legal relations engendered by community interests have been conceptualized in a bilateral manner so that they could fit adjudicative bilateralism. It may seem counterintuitive, but it will be maintained that this second avenue offers the most concrete, yet not entirely satisfactory, means to adjudicate community interests. Finally, the essay argues that the Monetary Gold rule proves a useful test to properly understand the different logic of these two avenues.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2398772321000167/type/journal_article
spellingShingle Beatrice I. Bonafé
Adjudicative Bilateralism and Community Interests
AJIL Unbound
title Adjudicative Bilateralism and Community Interests
title_full Adjudicative Bilateralism and Community Interests
title_fullStr Adjudicative Bilateralism and Community Interests
title_full_unstemmed Adjudicative Bilateralism and Community Interests
title_short Adjudicative Bilateralism and Community Interests
title_sort adjudicative bilateralism and community interests
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2398772321000167/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT beatriceibonafe adjudicativebilateralismandcommunityinterests