Quantifying Habitual Physical Activity and Sedentariness in Older Adults—Different Outcomes of Two Simultaneously Body-Worn Motion Sensor Approaches and a Self-Estimation

Applicable and accurate assessment methods are required for a clinically relevant quantification of habitual physical activity (PA) levels and sedentariness in older adults. The aim of this study is to compare habitual PA and sedentariness, as assessed with (1) a wrist-worn actigraph, (2) a hybrid m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rieke Trumpf, Wiebren Zijlstra, Peter Haussermann, Tim Fleiner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-03-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/7/1877
_version_ 1797626492291645440
author Rieke Trumpf
Wiebren Zijlstra
Peter Haussermann
Tim Fleiner
author_facet Rieke Trumpf
Wiebren Zijlstra
Peter Haussermann
Tim Fleiner
author_sort Rieke Trumpf
collection DOAJ
description Applicable and accurate assessment methods are required for a clinically relevant quantification of habitual physical activity (PA) levels and sedentariness in older adults. The aim of this study is to compare habitual PA and sedentariness, as assessed with (1) a wrist-worn actigraph, (2) a hybrid motion sensor attached to the lower back, and (3) a self-estimation based on a questionnaire. Over the course of one week, PA of 58 community-dwelling subjectively healthy older adults was recorded. The results indicate that actigraphy overestimates the PA levels in older adults, whereas sedentariness is underestimated when compared to the hybrid motion sensor approach. Significantly longer durations (hh:mm/day) for all PA intensities were assessed with the actigraph (light: 04:19; moderate to vigorous: 05:08) when compared to the durations (hh:mm/day) that were assessed with the hybrid motion sensor (light: 01:24; moderate to vigorous: 02:21) and the self-estimated durations (hh:mm/day) (light: 02:33; moderate to vigorous: 03:04). Actigraphy-assessed durations of sedentariness (14:32 hh:mm/day) were significantly shorter when compared to the durations assessed with the hybrid motion sensor (20:15 hh:mm/day). Self-estimated duration of light intensity was significantly shorter when compared to the results of the hybrid motion sensor. The results of the present study highlight the importance of an accurate quantification of habitual PA levels and sedentariness in older adults. The use of hybrid motion sensors can offer important insights into the PA levels and PA types (e.g., sitting, lying) and it can increase the knowledge about mobility-related PA and patterns of sedentariness, while actigraphy appears to be not recommendable for this purpose.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T10:11:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bd83dcbd85b84f23a966b86c87cc4b30
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T10:11:11Z
publishDate 2020-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-bd83dcbd85b84f23a966b86c87cc4b302023-11-16T14:31:52ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202020-03-01207187710.3390/s20071877Quantifying Habitual Physical Activity and Sedentariness in Older Adults—Different Outcomes of Two Simultaneously Body-Worn Motion Sensor Approaches and a Self-EstimationRieke Trumpf0Wiebren Zijlstra1Peter Haussermann2Tim Fleiner3Institute of Movement and Sport Gerontology, German Sport University Cologne, 50933 Cologne, GermanyInstitute of Movement and Sport Gerontology, German Sport University Cologne, 50933 Cologne, GermanyDepartment of Geriatric Psychiatry & Psychotherapy, LVR-Hospital Cologne, 51109 Cologne, GermanyInstitute of Movement and Sport Gerontology, German Sport University Cologne, 50933 Cologne, GermanyApplicable and accurate assessment methods are required for a clinically relevant quantification of habitual physical activity (PA) levels and sedentariness in older adults. The aim of this study is to compare habitual PA and sedentariness, as assessed with (1) a wrist-worn actigraph, (2) a hybrid motion sensor attached to the lower back, and (3) a self-estimation based on a questionnaire. Over the course of one week, PA of 58 community-dwelling subjectively healthy older adults was recorded. The results indicate that actigraphy overestimates the PA levels in older adults, whereas sedentariness is underestimated when compared to the hybrid motion sensor approach. Significantly longer durations (hh:mm/day) for all PA intensities were assessed with the actigraph (light: 04:19; moderate to vigorous: 05:08) when compared to the durations (hh:mm/day) that were assessed with the hybrid motion sensor (light: 01:24; moderate to vigorous: 02:21) and the self-estimated durations (hh:mm/day) (light: 02:33; moderate to vigorous: 03:04). Actigraphy-assessed durations of sedentariness (14:32 hh:mm/day) were significantly shorter when compared to the durations assessed with the hybrid motion sensor (20:15 hh:mm/day). Self-estimated duration of light intensity was significantly shorter when compared to the results of the hybrid motion sensor. The results of the present study highlight the importance of an accurate quantification of habitual PA levels and sedentariness in older adults. The use of hybrid motion sensors can offer important insights into the PA levels and PA types (e.g., sitting, lying) and it can increase the knowledge about mobility-related PA and patterns of sedentariness, while actigraphy appears to be not recommendable for this purpose.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/7/1877actigraphyhybrid motion sensorsphysical activitysedentariness
spellingShingle Rieke Trumpf
Wiebren Zijlstra
Peter Haussermann
Tim Fleiner
Quantifying Habitual Physical Activity and Sedentariness in Older Adults—Different Outcomes of Two Simultaneously Body-Worn Motion Sensor Approaches and a Self-Estimation
Sensors
actigraphy
hybrid motion sensors
physical activity
sedentariness
title Quantifying Habitual Physical Activity and Sedentariness in Older Adults—Different Outcomes of Two Simultaneously Body-Worn Motion Sensor Approaches and a Self-Estimation
title_full Quantifying Habitual Physical Activity and Sedentariness in Older Adults—Different Outcomes of Two Simultaneously Body-Worn Motion Sensor Approaches and a Self-Estimation
title_fullStr Quantifying Habitual Physical Activity and Sedentariness in Older Adults—Different Outcomes of Two Simultaneously Body-Worn Motion Sensor Approaches and a Self-Estimation
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying Habitual Physical Activity and Sedentariness in Older Adults—Different Outcomes of Two Simultaneously Body-Worn Motion Sensor Approaches and a Self-Estimation
title_short Quantifying Habitual Physical Activity and Sedentariness in Older Adults—Different Outcomes of Two Simultaneously Body-Worn Motion Sensor Approaches and a Self-Estimation
title_sort quantifying habitual physical activity and sedentariness in older adults different outcomes of two simultaneously body worn motion sensor approaches and a self estimation
topic actigraphy
hybrid motion sensors
physical activity
sedentariness
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/7/1877
work_keys_str_mv AT rieketrumpf quantifyinghabitualphysicalactivityandsedentarinessinolderadultsdifferentoutcomesoftwosimultaneouslybodywornmotionsensorapproachesandaselfestimation
AT wiebrenzijlstra quantifyinghabitualphysicalactivityandsedentarinessinolderadultsdifferentoutcomesoftwosimultaneouslybodywornmotionsensorapproachesandaselfestimation
AT peterhaussermann quantifyinghabitualphysicalactivityandsedentarinessinolderadultsdifferentoutcomesoftwosimultaneouslybodywornmotionsensorapproachesandaselfestimation
AT timfleiner quantifyinghabitualphysicalactivityandsedentarinessinolderadultsdifferentoutcomesoftwosimultaneouslybodywornmotionsensorapproachesandaselfestimation