Synthetic data in cancer and cerebrovascular disease research: A novel approach to big data.

<h4>Objectives</h4>Synthetic datasets are artificially manufactured based on real health systems data but do not contain real patient information. We sought to validate the use of synthetic data in stroke and cancer research by conducting a comparison study of cancer patients with ischem...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ronda Lun, Deborah Siegal, Tim Ramsay, Grant Stotts, Dar Dowlatshahi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2024-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0295921&type=printable
_version_ 1797304781977419776
author Ronda Lun
Deborah Siegal
Tim Ramsay
Grant Stotts
Dar Dowlatshahi
author_facet Ronda Lun
Deborah Siegal
Tim Ramsay
Grant Stotts
Dar Dowlatshahi
author_sort Ronda Lun
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Objectives</h4>Synthetic datasets are artificially manufactured based on real health systems data but do not contain real patient information. We sought to validate the use of synthetic data in stroke and cancer research by conducting a comparison study of cancer patients with ischemic stroke to non-cancer patients with ischemic stroke.<h4>Design</h4>retrospective cohort study.<h4>Setting</h4>We used synthetic data generated by MDClone and compared it to its original source data (i.e. real patient data from the Ottawa Hospital Data Warehouse).<h4>Outcome measures</h4>We compared key differences in demographics, treatment characteristics, length of stay, and costs between cancer patients with ischemic stroke and non-cancer patients with ischemic stroke. We used a binary, multivariable logistic regression model to identify risk factors for recurrent stroke in the cancer population.<h4>Results</h4>Using synthetic data, we found cancer patients with ischemic stroke had a lower prevalence of hypertension (52.0% in the cancer cohort vs 57.7% in the non-cancer cohort, p<0.0001), and a higher prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD: 8.5% vs 4.7%, p<0.0001), prior ischemic stroke (1.7% vs 0.1%, p<0.001), and prior venous thromboembolism (VTE: 8.2% vs 1.5%, p<0.0001). They also had a longer length of stay (8 days [IQR 3-16] vs 6 days [IQR 3-13], p = 0.011), and higher costs associated with their stroke encounters: $11,498 (IQR $4,440 -$20,668) in the cancer cohort vs $8,084 (IQR $3,947 -$16,706) in the non-cancer cohort (p = 0.0061). A multivariable logistic regression model identified 5 predictors for recurrent ischemic stroke in the cancer cohort using synthetic data; 3 of the same predictors identified using real patient data with similar effect measures. Summary statistics between synthetic and original datasets did not significantly differ, other than slight differences in the distributions of frequencies for numeric data.<h4>Conclusion</h4>We demonstrated the utility of synthetic data in stroke and cancer research and provided key differences between cancer and non-cancer patients with ischemic stroke. Synthetic data is a powerful tool that can allow researchers to easily explore hypothesis generation, enable data sharing without privacy breaches, and ensure broad access to big data in a rapid, safe, and reliable fashion.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T00:15:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bd8768067e704f4eacc47bbf97b92e54
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T00:15:27Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-bd8768067e704f4eacc47bbf97b92e542024-02-17T05:33:08ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032024-01-01192e029592110.1371/journal.pone.0295921Synthetic data in cancer and cerebrovascular disease research: A novel approach to big data.Ronda LunDeborah SiegalTim RamsayGrant StottsDar Dowlatshahi<h4>Objectives</h4>Synthetic datasets are artificially manufactured based on real health systems data but do not contain real patient information. We sought to validate the use of synthetic data in stroke and cancer research by conducting a comparison study of cancer patients with ischemic stroke to non-cancer patients with ischemic stroke.<h4>Design</h4>retrospective cohort study.<h4>Setting</h4>We used synthetic data generated by MDClone and compared it to its original source data (i.e. real patient data from the Ottawa Hospital Data Warehouse).<h4>Outcome measures</h4>We compared key differences in demographics, treatment characteristics, length of stay, and costs between cancer patients with ischemic stroke and non-cancer patients with ischemic stroke. We used a binary, multivariable logistic regression model to identify risk factors for recurrent stroke in the cancer population.<h4>Results</h4>Using synthetic data, we found cancer patients with ischemic stroke had a lower prevalence of hypertension (52.0% in the cancer cohort vs 57.7% in the non-cancer cohort, p<0.0001), and a higher prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD: 8.5% vs 4.7%, p<0.0001), prior ischemic stroke (1.7% vs 0.1%, p<0.001), and prior venous thromboembolism (VTE: 8.2% vs 1.5%, p<0.0001). They also had a longer length of stay (8 days [IQR 3-16] vs 6 days [IQR 3-13], p = 0.011), and higher costs associated with their stroke encounters: $11,498 (IQR $4,440 -$20,668) in the cancer cohort vs $8,084 (IQR $3,947 -$16,706) in the non-cancer cohort (p = 0.0061). A multivariable logistic regression model identified 5 predictors for recurrent ischemic stroke in the cancer cohort using synthetic data; 3 of the same predictors identified using real patient data with similar effect measures. Summary statistics between synthetic and original datasets did not significantly differ, other than slight differences in the distributions of frequencies for numeric data.<h4>Conclusion</h4>We demonstrated the utility of synthetic data in stroke and cancer research and provided key differences between cancer and non-cancer patients with ischemic stroke. Synthetic data is a powerful tool that can allow researchers to easily explore hypothesis generation, enable data sharing without privacy breaches, and ensure broad access to big data in a rapid, safe, and reliable fashion.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0295921&type=printable
spellingShingle Ronda Lun
Deborah Siegal
Tim Ramsay
Grant Stotts
Dar Dowlatshahi
Synthetic data in cancer and cerebrovascular disease research: A novel approach to big data.
PLoS ONE
title Synthetic data in cancer and cerebrovascular disease research: A novel approach to big data.
title_full Synthetic data in cancer and cerebrovascular disease research: A novel approach to big data.
title_fullStr Synthetic data in cancer and cerebrovascular disease research: A novel approach to big data.
title_full_unstemmed Synthetic data in cancer and cerebrovascular disease research: A novel approach to big data.
title_short Synthetic data in cancer and cerebrovascular disease research: A novel approach to big data.
title_sort synthetic data in cancer and cerebrovascular disease research a novel approach to big data
url https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0295921&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT rondalun syntheticdataincancerandcerebrovasculardiseaseresearchanovelapproachtobigdata
AT deborahsiegal syntheticdataincancerandcerebrovasculardiseaseresearchanovelapproachtobigdata
AT timramsay syntheticdataincancerandcerebrovasculardiseaseresearchanovelapproachtobigdata
AT grantstotts syntheticdataincancerandcerebrovasculardiseaseresearchanovelapproachtobigdata
AT dardowlatshahi syntheticdataincancerandcerebrovasculardiseaseresearchanovelapproachtobigdata