Underground Land Administration from 2D to 3D: Critical Challenges and Future Research Directions
The development and use of underground space is a necessity for most cities in response to rapid urbanisation. Effective underground land administration is critical for sustainable urban development. From a land administration perspective, the ownership extent of underground assets is essential for...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-10-01
|
Series: | Land |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/10/1101 |
_version_ | 1797514128709910528 |
---|---|
author | Bahram Saeidian Abbas Rajabifard Behnam Atazadeh Mohsen Kalantari |
author_facet | Bahram Saeidian Abbas Rajabifard Behnam Atazadeh Mohsen Kalantari |
author_sort | Bahram Saeidian |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The development and use of underground space is a necessity for most cities in response to rapid urbanisation. Effective underground land administration is critical for sustainable urban development. From a land administration perspective, the ownership extent of underground assets is essential for planning and managing underground areas. In some jurisdictions, physical structures (e.g., walls, ceilings, and utilities) are also necessary to delineate the ownership extent of underground assets. The current practice of underground land administration focuses on the ownership of underground space and mostly relies on 2D survey plans. This inefficient and fragmented 2D-based underground data management and communication results in several issues including boundary disputes, underground strikes, delays and disruptions in projects, economic losses, and urban planning issues. This study provides a review of underground land administration from three common aspects: legal, institutional, and technical. A range of important challenges have been identified based on the current research and practice. To address these challenges, the authors of this study propose a new framework for 3D underground land administration. The proposed framework outlines the future research directions to upgrade underground land administration using integrated 3D digital approaches. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-10T06:27:15Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-bd9bad8c317f40e68251b9d2470e353e |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2073-445X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-10T06:27:15Z |
publishDate | 2021-10-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Land |
spelling | doaj.art-bd9bad8c317f40e68251b9d2470e353e2023-11-22T18:51:46ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2021-10-011010110110.3390/land10101101Underground Land Administration from 2D to 3D: Critical Challenges and Future Research DirectionsBahram Saeidian0Abbas Rajabifard1Behnam Atazadeh2Mohsen Kalantari3The Centre for Spatial Data Infrastructures and Land Administration, Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, AustraliaThe Centre for Spatial Data Infrastructures and Land Administration, Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, AustraliaThe Centre for Spatial Data Infrastructures and Land Administration, Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, AustraliaThe Centre for Spatial Data Infrastructures and Land Administration, Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, AustraliaThe development and use of underground space is a necessity for most cities in response to rapid urbanisation. Effective underground land administration is critical for sustainable urban development. From a land administration perspective, the ownership extent of underground assets is essential for planning and managing underground areas. In some jurisdictions, physical structures (e.g., walls, ceilings, and utilities) are also necessary to delineate the ownership extent of underground assets. The current practice of underground land administration focuses on the ownership of underground space and mostly relies on 2D survey plans. This inefficient and fragmented 2D-based underground data management and communication results in several issues including boundary disputes, underground strikes, delays and disruptions in projects, economic losses, and urban planning issues. This study provides a review of underground land administration from three common aspects: legal, institutional, and technical. A range of important challenges have been identified based on the current research and practice. To address these challenges, the authors of this study propose a new framework for 3D underground land administration. The proposed framework outlines the future research directions to upgrade underground land administration using integrated 3D digital approaches.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/10/1101underground space3D land administration3D cadastreaspects of ULAsubsurface space management |
spellingShingle | Bahram Saeidian Abbas Rajabifard Behnam Atazadeh Mohsen Kalantari Underground Land Administration from 2D to 3D: Critical Challenges and Future Research Directions Land underground space 3D land administration 3D cadastre aspects of ULA subsurface space management |
title | Underground Land Administration from 2D to 3D: Critical Challenges and Future Research Directions |
title_full | Underground Land Administration from 2D to 3D: Critical Challenges and Future Research Directions |
title_fullStr | Underground Land Administration from 2D to 3D: Critical Challenges and Future Research Directions |
title_full_unstemmed | Underground Land Administration from 2D to 3D: Critical Challenges and Future Research Directions |
title_short | Underground Land Administration from 2D to 3D: Critical Challenges and Future Research Directions |
title_sort | underground land administration from 2d to 3d critical challenges and future research directions |
topic | underground space 3D land administration 3D cadastre aspects of ULA subsurface space management |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/10/1101 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bahramsaeidian undergroundlandadministrationfrom2dto3dcriticalchallengesandfutureresearchdirections AT abbasrajabifard undergroundlandadministrationfrom2dto3dcriticalchallengesandfutureresearchdirections AT behnamatazadeh undergroundlandadministrationfrom2dto3dcriticalchallengesandfutureresearchdirections AT mohsenkalantari undergroundlandadministrationfrom2dto3dcriticalchallengesandfutureresearchdirections |