Underground Land Administration from 2D to 3D: Critical Challenges and Future Research Directions

The development and use of underground space is a necessity for most cities in response to rapid urbanisation. Effective underground land administration is critical for sustainable urban development. From a land administration perspective, the ownership extent of underground assets is essential for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bahram Saeidian, Abbas Rajabifard, Behnam Atazadeh, Mohsen Kalantari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-10-01
Series:Land
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/10/1101
_version_ 1797514128709910528
author Bahram Saeidian
Abbas Rajabifard
Behnam Atazadeh
Mohsen Kalantari
author_facet Bahram Saeidian
Abbas Rajabifard
Behnam Atazadeh
Mohsen Kalantari
author_sort Bahram Saeidian
collection DOAJ
description The development and use of underground space is a necessity for most cities in response to rapid urbanisation. Effective underground land administration is critical for sustainable urban development. From a land administration perspective, the ownership extent of underground assets is essential for planning and managing underground areas. In some jurisdictions, physical structures (e.g., walls, ceilings, and utilities) are also necessary to delineate the ownership extent of underground assets. The current practice of underground land administration focuses on the ownership of underground space and mostly relies on 2D survey plans. This inefficient and fragmented 2D-based underground data management and communication results in several issues including boundary disputes, underground strikes, delays and disruptions in projects, economic losses, and urban planning issues. This study provides a review of underground land administration from three common aspects: legal, institutional, and technical. A range of important challenges have been identified based on the current research and practice. To address these challenges, the authors of this study propose a new framework for 3D underground land administration. The proposed framework outlines the future research directions to upgrade underground land administration using integrated 3D digital approaches.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T06:27:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bd9bad8c317f40e68251b9d2470e353e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-445X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T06:27:15Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Land
spelling doaj.art-bd9bad8c317f40e68251b9d2470e353e2023-11-22T18:51:46ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2021-10-011010110110.3390/land10101101Underground Land Administration from 2D to 3D: Critical Challenges and Future Research DirectionsBahram Saeidian0Abbas Rajabifard1Behnam Atazadeh2Mohsen Kalantari3The Centre for Spatial Data Infrastructures and Land Administration, Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, AustraliaThe Centre for Spatial Data Infrastructures and Land Administration, Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, AustraliaThe Centre for Spatial Data Infrastructures and Land Administration, Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, AustraliaThe Centre for Spatial Data Infrastructures and Land Administration, Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, AustraliaThe development and use of underground space is a necessity for most cities in response to rapid urbanisation. Effective underground land administration is critical for sustainable urban development. From a land administration perspective, the ownership extent of underground assets is essential for planning and managing underground areas. In some jurisdictions, physical structures (e.g., walls, ceilings, and utilities) are also necessary to delineate the ownership extent of underground assets. The current practice of underground land administration focuses on the ownership of underground space and mostly relies on 2D survey plans. This inefficient and fragmented 2D-based underground data management and communication results in several issues including boundary disputes, underground strikes, delays and disruptions in projects, economic losses, and urban planning issues. This study provides a review of underground land administration from three common aspects: legal, institutional, and technical. A range of important challenges have been identified based on the current research and practice. To address these challenges, the authors of this study propose a new framework for 3D underground land administration. The proposed framework outlines the future research directions to upgrade underground land administration using integrated 3D digital approaches.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/10/1101underground space3D land administration3D cadastreaspects of ULAsubsurface space management
spellingShingle Bahram Saeidian
Abbas Rajabifard
Behnam Atazadeh
Mohsen Kalantari
Underground Land Administration from 2D to 3D: Critical Challenges and Future Research Directions
Land
underground space
3D land administration
3D cadastre
aspects of ULA
subsurface space management
title Underground Land Administration from 2D to 3D: Critical Challenges and Future Research Directions
title_full Underground Land Administration from 2D to 3D: Critical Challenges and Future Research Directions
title_fullStr Underground Land Administration from 2D to 3D: Critical Challenges and Future Research Directions
title_full_unstemmed Underground Land Administration from 2D to 3D: Critical Challenges and Future Research Directions
title_short Underground Land Administration from 2D to 3D: Critical Challenges and Future Research Directions
title_sort underground land administration from 2d to 3d critical challenges and future research directions
topic underground space
3D land administration
3D cadastre
aspects of ULA
subsurface space management
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/10/1101
work_keys_str_mv AT bahramsaeidian undergroundlandadministrationfrom2dto3dcriticalchallengesandfutureresearchdirections
AT abbasrajabifard undergroundlandadministrationfrom2dto3dcriticalchallengesandfutureresearchdirections
AT behnamatazadeh undergroundlandadministrationfrom2dto3dcriticalchallengesandfutureresearchdirections
AT mohsenkalantari undergroundlandadministrationfrom2dto3dcriticalchallengesandfutureresearchdirections