Non-target screening and risk assessment of organophosphate esters (OPEs) in drinking water resource water, surface water, groundwater, and seawater

By use of an integrated target, suspect, and non-target screening strategy, we investigated occurrence and spatial distribution of organophosphate esters (OPEs) in four types of water (drinking water resource water, surface water, groundwater, and seawater) collected from Jiangsu Province (China) in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jianan Huang, Zhanqi Gao, Guanjiu Hu, Guanyong Su
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-10-01
Series:Environment International
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412022003701
Description
Summary:By use of an integrated target, suspect, and non-target screening strategy, we investigated occurrence and spatial distribution of organophosphate esters (OPEs) in four types of water (drinking water resource water, surface water, groundwater, and seawater) collected from Jiangsu Province (China) in 2021 (n = 111). Eighteen out of 23 target OPEs were detectable at least once in these analyzed samples, and the total concentrations (Σ18OPEs) of OPEs in various water samples exhibited a descending order following as: groundwater (67026 ng/L) > surface water (35803 ng/L) > drinking water resource water (21055 ng/L) > seawater (17820 ng/L). The highest concentration detected in groundwater may be ascribed to pollution from surrounding factories. Among the target OPEs, triethyl phosphate (TEP), tris(chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP), and tris (1-chloro-2-propyl) phosphate (TCIPP) were the most abundant congeners with the average concentrations of 407 ng/L, 143 ng/L, and 475 ng/L, respectively. Besides of 18 target OPEs, we further identified 17 suspect OPEs (3 of them were fully identified by authentic standards) on the basis of in-house suspect screening OPE database, and 2 non-target organophosphates (OPs) on the basis of feature fragments. One of these 2 non-target OPs was fully identified as bis(2-chloroethyl) 2-chloroethylphosphonate (B2CE2CEPP) by matching the retention time and MS/MS data with authentic standard, and the other one was preliminarily identified as 2,4,8,10-tetra-tert-butyl-6-methoxydibenzo[d,f][1,3,2]dioxaphosphepin-6-one (TTBMDBDOPPO). We also observed that B2CE2CEPP shared a similar structure with TCEP, suggesting that they may have similar toxicological characteristics and commercial sources. The ecological and human health risk assessments indicated that all OPEs posed a low or negligible ecological risk to aquatic organisms (algae, crustacean, and fish), and negligible risk to human health except for trimethyl phosphate (TMP) in drinking water resource water.
ISSN:0160-4120