Examining the Differences of Readability Leveling of Chinese Popular Science Books by Experts and by CRIE System for Elementary School Children

Popular scientific reading books, as the bridge between scientific academic research and general public’s knowledge capital, could raise scientific literacy and facilitate comprehension for general public. Popular scientific reading books could attract children to read because of vivid exhibition of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chao-Chen Chen, Yao-Ting Sung, Chiung-Feng Chang, Ho-Chiang Tseng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: National Taiwan University 2020-06-01
Series:Journal of Library and Information Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jlis.lis.ntu.edu.tw/files/journal/j50-3.pdf
Description
Summary:Popular scientific reading books, as the bridge between scientific academic research and general public’s knowledge capital, could raise scientific literacy and facilitate comprehension for general public. Popular scientific reading books could attract children to read because of vivid exhibition of text and illustrating graphs. However, some scientific reading books are still too difficult for children to read since they are not designed for children particularly in Taiwan and reading capacity among children are heterogeneous. One promising education strategy is to recommend more scientific reading books corresponding to textbook lessons, which could raise children’s interest in exploring science and further reading. In US, Lexile framework for reading has been developed and applied for English books to assist in more efficient and objective text leveling. For recent years, Chinese Readability Index Explorer (CRIE) has been developed for Chinese text. The main research question here is, for Chinese scientific reading books, whether there are differences in text leveling between system’s (CRIE) and experts’ identification. In our research, we invite teacher librarians to recommend popular scientific reading books, identify the grade levels, and assign these books to corresponding textbook lessons. We not only discuss the principles and criteria of experts’ leveling, compare the different results between CRIE and experts’ opinions, but also investigate the reasons behind these differences. (Article content in Chinese with English extended abstract)
ISSN:1606-7509
1606-7509