The Relative Success of Consociational Institutions in Deeply Divided Societies

Lebanon and Northern Ireland conjure opposite images on consociationalism in the minds of many political scientists. While in Lebanon, the consociational system widely proved inefficient in preventing the outbreak of ethno-national conflicts, the Northern Ireland’s experience of consociationalism r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Chloé Bernadaux
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: International Association for Political Science Students (IAPSS) 2020-12-01
Series:Politikon
Subjects:
Online Access:https://politikon.iapss.org/index.php/politikon/article/view/329
_version_ 1827794053868027904
author Chloé Bernadaux
author_facet Chloé Bernadaux
author_sort Chloé Bernadaux
collection DOAJ
description Lebanon and Northern Ireland conjure opposite images on consociationalism in the minds of many political scientists. While in Lebanon, the consociational system widely proved inefficient in preventing the outbreak of ethno-national conflicts, the Northern Ireland’s experience of consociationalism remains vastly positive. Following a “Most Similar Systems Design” defined by Adam Przeworski and Henry Teune (2000), this research note tests the hypothesis that the positive nature of exogenous influences participates to a higher political stability in Northern Ireland relative to Lebanon, where external influences of negative nature had the reverse effect. For the sake of this study, the developments taking place after the signature of the agreements shaping both consociational systems – the Ta’if Agreement of 1989 in Lebanon and the Good Friday Agreement of 1998 in Northern Ireland – are analysed through a particular focus on elites’ external relations with patron states and their interactions with their regional or global environments.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T18:27:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bda63fe5ab83438a9981bcfb64a7eb8d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2414-6633
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T18:27:18Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher International Association for Political Science Students (IAPSS)
record_format Article
series Politikon
spelling doaj.art-bda63fe5ab83438a9981bcfb64a7eb8d2023-10-13T18:22:32ZengInternational Association for Political Science Students (IAPSS)Politikon2414-66332020-12-014710.22151/politikon.47.4The Relative Success of Consociational Institutions in Deeply Divided SocietiesChloé Bernadaux0Sciences Po Paris Lebanon and Northern Ireland conjure opposite images on consociationalism in the minds of many political scientists. While in Lebanon, the consociational system widely proved inefficient in preventing the outbreak of ethno-national conflicts, the Northern Ireland’s experience of consociationalism remains vastly positive. Following a “Most Similar Systems Design” defined by Adam Przeworski and Henry Teune (2000), this research note tests the hypothesis that the positive nature of exogenous influences participates to a higher political stability in Northern Ireland relative to Lebanon, where external influences of negative nature had the reverse effect. For the sake of this study, the developments taking place after the signature of the agreements shaping both consociational systems – the Ta’if Agreement of 1989 in Lebanon and the Good Friday Agreement of 1998 in Northern Ireland – are analysed through a particular focus on elites’ external relations with patron states and their interactions with their regional or global environments. https://politikon.iapss.org/index.php/politikon/article/view/329Comparative PoliticsConsociational DemocraciesDivided SocietiesGood Friday AgreementTa’if Agreement
spellingShingle Chloé Bernadaux
The Relative Success of Consociational Institutions in Deeply Divided Societies
Politikon
Comparative Politics
Consociational Democracies
Divided Societies
Good Friday Agreement
Ta’if Agreement
title The Relative Success of Consociational Institutions in Deeply Divided Societies
title_full The Relative Success of Consociational Institutions in Deeply Divided Societies
title_fullStr The Relative Success of Consociational Institutions in Deeply Divided Societies
title_full_unstemmed The Relative Success of Consociational Institutions in Deeply Divided Societies
title_short The Relative Success of Consociational Institutions in Deeply Divided Societies
title_sort relative success of consociational institutions in deeply divided societies
topic Comparative Politics
Consociational Democracies
Divided Societies
Good Friday Agreement
Ta’if Agreement
url https://politikon.iapss.org/index.php/politikon/article/view/329
work_keys_str_mv AT chloebernadaux therelativesuccessofconsociationalinstitutionsindeeplydividedsocieties
AT chloebernadaux relativesuccessofconsociationalinstitutionsindeeplydividedsocieties