A Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Methods for Personnel Selection: A Practical Approach
This research focused on decision-making supported by multi-criteria decision methods, specifically TOPSIS, OWA, and their respective variants within personnel selection. The study presented models aimed at facilitating the selection of the best candidate for a job through competency-based assessmen...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2024-01-01
|
Series: | Mathematics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/2/324 |
_version_ | 1797343017899655168 |
---|---|
author | Pablo A. Pinto-DelaCadena Vicente Liern Andrea Vinueza-Cabezas |
author_facet | Pablo A. Pinto-DelaCadena Vicente Liern Andrea Vinueza-Cabezas |
author_sort | Pablo A. Pinto-DelaCadena |
collection | DOAJ |
description | This research focused on decision-making supported by multi-criteria decision methods, specifically TOPSIS, OWA, and their respective variants within personnel selection. The study presented models aimed at facilitating the selection of the best candidate for a job through competency-based assessments and comparing the application of four methods across various scenarios. We employed methods such as TOPSIS, OWA, and two variations (Canós–Liern method and an OWA model based on mathematically replicating expert opinion). Each model provided distinct rankings and demonstrated adaptability to specific situations within a company. Furthermore, it was emphasized that each method could and should be tailored according to the company’s reality to derive maximum benefit from its implementation. A crucial aspect of securing the best candidates involves understanding the context and identifying the appropriate methodology. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-08T10:41:35Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-bdaa1f03c9cf4f4c94f21f01f6e6d447 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2227-7390 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-08T10:41:35Z |
publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Mathematics |
spelling | doaj.art-bdaa1f03c9cf4f4c94f21f01f6e6d4472024-01-26T17:33:39ZengMDPI AGMathematics2227-73902024-01-0112232410.3390/math12020324A Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Methods for Personnel Selection: A Practical ApproachPablo A. Pinto-DelaCadena0Vicente Liern1Andrea Vinueza-Cabezas2Business School, Universidad Internacional del Ecuador, UIDE, Quito 170411, EcuadorDepartament Matamàtiques per a l’Economia i l’Empresa, Universitat de València, 46022 Valencia, SpainGrupo de Investigación Bienestar, Salud y Sociedad, Escuela de Psicología y Educación, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito 170125, EcuadorThis research focused on decision-making supported by multi-criteria decision methods, specifically TOPSIS, OWA, and their respective variants within personnel selection. The study presented models aimed at facilitating the selection of the best candidate for a job through competency-based assessments and comparing the application of four methods across various scenarios. We employed methods such as TOPSIS, OWA, and two variations (Canós–Liern method and an OWA model based on mathematically replicating expert opinion). Each model provided distinct rankings and demonstrated adaptability to specific situations within a company. Furthermore, it was emphasized that each method could and should be tailored according to the company’s reality to derive maximum benefit from its implementation. A crucial aspect of securing the best candidates involves understanding the context and identifying the appropriate methodology.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/2/324TOPSISOWAhuman resourcespersonnel selectionmulti-criteria decision making |
spellingShingle | Pablo A. Pinto-DelaCadena Vicente Liern Andrea Vinueza-Cabezas A Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Methods for Personnel Selection: A Practical Approach Mathematics TOPSIS OWA human resources personnel selection multi-criteria decision making |
title | A Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Methods for Personnel Selection: A Practical Approach |
title_full | A Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Methods for Personnel Selection: A Practical Approach |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Methods for Personnel Selection: A Practical Approach |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Methods for Personnel Selection: A Practical Approach |
title_short | A Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Methods for Personnel Selection: A Practical Approach |
title_sort | comparative analysis of multi criteria decision methods for personnel selection a practical approach |
topic | TOPSIS OWA human resources personnel selection multi-criteria decision making |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/2/324 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pabloapintodelacadena acomparativeanalysisofmulticriteriadecisionmethodsforpersonnelselectionapracticalapproach AT vicenteliern acomparativeanalysisofmulticriteriadecisionmethodsforpersonnelselectionapracticalapproach AT andreavinuezacabezas acomparativeanalysisofmulticriteriadecisionmethodsforpersonnelselectionapracticalapproach AT pabloapintodelacadena comparativeanalysisofmulticriteriadecisionmethodsforpersonnelselectionapracticalapproach AT vicenteliern comparativeanalysisofmulticriteriadecisionmethodsforpersonnelselectionapracticalapproach AT andreavinuezacabezas comparativeanalysisofmulticriteriadecisionmethodsforpersonnelselectionapracticalapproach |