Numerical Modelling of Porous Radiant Burners Using Full and Reduced Kinetics Mechanisms

The present paper compares full kinetics mechanisms in numerical modelling of porous radiant burners (PRB), with their reduced forms. The two most frequently used mechanisms of methane combustion (GRI3.0 and Miller) were selected and their effects were examined on temperature, species concentration,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mostafa Khosravy El-Hossaini, Mehdi Maerefat, Kiumars Mazaheri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Iranian Institute of Research and Development in Chemical Industries (IRDCI)-ACECR 2008-03-01
Series:Iranian Journal of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijcce.ac.ir/article_7012_446b9949155fed97f85b8a16a937f589.pdf
_version_ 1818643250140938240
author Mostafa Khosravy El-Hossaini
Mehdi Maerefat
Kiumars Mazaheri
author_facet Mostafa Khosravy El-Hossaini
Mehdi Maerefat
Kiumars Mazaheri
author_sort Mostafa Khosravy El-Hossaini
collection DOAJ
description The present paper compares full kinetics mechanisms in numerical modelling of porous radiant burners (PRB), with their reduced forms. The two most frequently used mechanisms of methane combustion (GRI3.0 and Miller) were selected and their effects were examined on temperature, species concentration, burning speed, and pollutant emission. While the findings of numerical simulation of PRB show fine concurrence between each full mechanism and its related reduced mechanism, no significant temperature differences are observed in the results of full mechanisms. However, CO concentration along burner axis shows a small difference between two full mechanisms, which is related to HCO and HO2 concentrations. The inconsistency is more pronounced for NO concentration along porous axis, which is due to prompt NO evaluation. The present research finds deviation also between burning speeds, calculated by numerical simulation and experimental results. This difference is much more significant in rich mixtures. GRI3.0 mechanism estimated the burning velocities as closer to the experimental values than those predicted using Miller mechanism.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T23:55:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bdaf9aec677f43089a6d843f48aba320
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1021-9986
1021-9986
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T23:55:58Z
publishDate 2008-03-01
publisher Iranian Institute of Research and Development in Chemical Industries (IRDCI)-ACECR
record_format Article
series Iranian Journal of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering
spelling doaj.art-bdaf9aec677f43089a6d843f48aba3202022-12-21T22:11:12ZengIranian Institute of Research and Development in Chemical Industries (IRDCI)-ACECRIranian Journal of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering1021-99861021-99862008-03-0127153637012Numerical Modelling of Porous Radiant Burners Using Full and Reduced Kinetics MechanismsMostafa Khosravy El-Hossaini0Mehdi Maerefat1Kiumars Mazaheri2Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, P.O. Box 14115-111 Tehran, I.R. IRANDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, P.O. Box 14115-111 Tehran, I.R. IRANDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, P.O. Box 14115-111 Tehran, I.R. IRANThe present paper compares full kinetics mechanisms in numerical modelling of porous radiant burners (PRB), with their reduced forms. The two most frequently used mechanisms of methane combustion (GRI3.0 and Miller) were selected and their effects were examined on temperature, species concentration, burning speed, and pollutant emission. While the findings of numerical simulation of PRB show fine concurrence between each full mechanism and its related reduced mechanism, no significant temperature differences are observed in the results of full mechanisms. However, CO concentration along burner axis shows a small difference between two full mechanisms, which is related to HCO and HO2 concentrations. The inconsistency is more pronounced for NO concentration along porous axis, which is due to prompt NO evaluation. The present research finds deviation also between burning speeds, calculated by numerical simulation and experimental results. This difference is much more significant in rich mixtures. GRI3.0 mechanism estimated the burning velocities as closer to the experimental values than those predicted using Miller mechanism.http://www.ijcce.ac.ir/article_7012_446b9949155fed97f85b8a16a937f589.pdffull kinetics mechanismreduced mechanismporous radiant burnernumerical simulation
spellingShingle Mostafa Khosravy El-Hossaini
Mehdi Maerefat
Kiumars Mazaheri
Numerical Modelling of Porous Radiant Burners Using Full and Reduced Kinetics Mechanisms
Iranian Journal of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering
full kinetics mechanism
reduced mechanism
porous radiant burner
numerical simulation
title Numerical Modelling of Porous Radiant Burners Using Full and Reduced Kinetics Mechanisms
title_full Numerical Modelling of Porous Radiant Burners Using Full and Reduced Kinetics Mechanisms
title_fullStr Numerical Modelling of Porous Radiant Burners Using Full and Reduced Kinetics Mechanisms
title_full_unstemmed Numerical Modelling of Porous Radiant Burners Using Full and Reduced Kinetics Mechanisms
title_short Numerical Modelling of Porous Radiant Burners Using Full and Reduced Kinetics Mechanisms
title_sort numerical modelling of porous radiant burners using full and reduced kinetics mechanisms
topic full kinetics mechanism
reduced mechanism
porous radiant burner
numerical simulation
url http://www.ijcce.ac.ir/article_7012_446b9949155fed97f85b8a16a937f589.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mostafakhosravyelhossaini numericalmodellingofporousradiantburnersusingfullandreducedkineticsmechanisms
AT mehdimaerefat numericalmodellingofporousradiantburnersusingfullandreducedkineticsmechanisms
AT kiumarsmazaheri numericalmodellingofporousradiantburnersusingfullandreducedkineticsmechanisms