Explorations in Reported Moral Behaviors, Values, and Moral Emotions in Four Countries

University students (n = 758) from Bulgaria, Estonia, Finland, and Portugal were given a list of morally relevant behaviors (MRB), the Schwartz Value Survey (PVQ40) and Tangney’s TOSCA, measuring empathic guilt, guilt over norm-breaking, and shame. A factor analysis of MRB yielded 4 dimensions: pros...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liisa Myyry, Klaus Helkama, Mia Silfver-Kuhalampi, Kristina Petkova, Joaquim Pires Valentim, Kadi Liik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661172/full
_version_ 1818599114326147072
author Liisa Myyry
Klaus Helkama
Mia Silfver-Kuhalampi
Kristina Petkova
Joaquim Pires Valentim
Kadi Liik
author_facet Liisa Myyry
Klaus Helkama
Mia Silfver-Kuhalampi
Kristina Petkova
Joaquim Pires Valentim
Kadi Liik
author_sort Liisa Myyry
collection DOAJ
description University students (n = 758) from Bulgaria, Estonia, Finland, and Portugal were given a list of morally relevant behaviors (MRB), the Schwartz Value Survey (PVQ40) and Tangney’s TOSCA, measuring empathic guilt, guilt over norm-breaking, and shame. A factor analysis of MRB yielded 4 dimensions: prosocial behaviors, interpersonal transgressions, antisocial behaviors and secret transgressions. Prosocial behaviors were predicted by self-transcendence–self-enhancement (SET) value contrast only while the three transgression categories were associated with both SET and openness to change–conservation (hedonism–conformity) contrast. Norm-breaking guilt was more strongly associated with behaviors than were empathic guilt and shame. However, shame was (positively) associated with secret transgressions in three countries, after controlling for values. The associations were strongest in Bulgaria and Estonia while fewer associations were found in Finland and Portugal. The implications of the findings for the cross-cultural psychology of morality are discussed.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T12:14:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bdb0f7a36c6a4188b4995668c44f5a41
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T12:14:27Z
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-bdb0f7a36c6a4188b4995668c44f5a412022-12-21T22:32:08ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782021-04-011210.3389/fpsyg.2021.661172661172Explorations in Reported Moral Behaviors, Values, and Moral Emotions in Four CountriesLiisa Myyry0Klaus Helkama1Mia Silfver-Kuhalampi2Kristina Petkova3Joaquim Pires Valentim4Kadi Liik5Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandFaculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandFaculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandInstitute of Philosophy and Sociology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, BulgariaFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, PortugalSchool of Natural Sciences and Health, Tallinn University, Tallinn, EstoniaUniversity students (n = 758) from Bulgaria, Estonia, Finland, and Portugal were given a list of morally relevant behaviors (MRB), the Schwartz Value Survey (PVQ40) and Tangney’s TOSCA, measuring empathic guilt, guilt over norm-breaking, and shame. A factor analysis of MRB yielded 4 dimensions: prosocial behaviors, interpersonal transgressions, antisocial behaviors and secret transgressions. Prosocial behaviors were predicted by self-transcendence–self-enhancement (SET) value contrast only while the three transgression categories were associated with both SET and openness to change–conservation (hedonism–conformity) contrast. Norm-breaking guilt was more strongly associated with behaviors than were empathic guilt and shame. However, shame was (positively) associated with secret transgressions in three countries, after controlling for values. The associations were strongest in Bulgaria and Estonia while fewer associations were found in Finland and Portugal. The implications of the findings for the cross-cultural psychology of morality are discussed.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661172/fullguiltmoral behaviorsecretsshamevalues
spellingShingle Liisa Myyry
Klaus Helkama
Mia Silfver-Kuhalampi
Kristina Petkova
Joaquim Pires Valentim
Kadi Liik
Explorations in Reported Moral Behaviors, Values, and Moral Emotions in Four Countries
Frontiers in Psychology
guilt
moral behavior
secrets
shame
values
title Explorations in Reported Moral Behaviors, Values, and Moral Emotions in Four Countries
title_full Explorations in Reported Moral Behaviors, Values, and Moral Emotions in Four Countries
title_fullStr Explorations in Reported Moral Behaviors, Values, and Moral Emotions in Four Countries
title_full_unstemmed Explorations in Reported Moral Behaviors, Values, and Moral Emotions in Four Countries
title_short Explorations in Reported Moral Behaviors, Values, and Moral Emotions in Four Countries
title_sort explorations in reported moral behaviors values and moral emotions in four countries
topic guilt
moral behavior
secrets
shame
values
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661172/full
work_keys_str_mv AT liisamyyry explorationsinreportedmoralbehaviorsvaluesandmoralemotionsinfourcountries
AT klaushelkama explorationsinreportedmoralbehaviorsvaluesandmoralemotionsinfourcountries
AT miasilfverkuhalampi explorationsinreportedmoralbehaviorsvaluesandmoralemotionsinfourcountries
AT kristinapetkova explorationsinreportedmoralbehaviorsvaluesandmoralemotionsinfourcountries
AT joaquimpiresvalentim explorationsinreportedmoralbehaviorsvaluesandmoralemotionsinfourcountries
AT kadiliik explorationsinreportedmoralbehaviorsvaluesandmoralemotionsinfourcountries