A review of the psychometric properties and implications for the use of the fertility quality of life tool

Abstract Objectives To analyze and synthesize the reported psychometric properties of the Fertility Quality of Life (FertiQoL) instrument and describe its implications for use in practice and research in men and women with infertility. Methods A systematic literature search was performed to identify...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brittany M. Woods, Leigh Ann Bray, Sukhkamal Campbell, Aimee Holland, Sylvie Mrug, Sigrid Ladores
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-05-01
Series:Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-023-02125-x
_version_ 1797827339058413568
author Brittany M. Woods
Leigh Ann Bray
Sukhkamal Campbell
Aimee Holland
Sylvie Mrug
Sigrid Ladores
author_facet Brittany M. Woods
Leigh Ann Bray
Sukhkamal Campbell
Aimee Holland
Sylvie Mrug
Sigrid Ladores
author_sort Brittany M. Woods
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objectives To analyze and synthesize the reported psychometric properties of the Fertility Quality of Life (FertiQoL) instrument and describe its implications for use in practice and research in men and women with infertility. Methods A systematic literature search was performed to identify all articles using the FertiQoL tool. PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched from September 2006 through May 2022. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they reported psychometric data on the original FertiQoL tool using a sample population of individuals with infertility. Sample size, country of origin, and psychometric data were documented for each study. Results The initial search revealed 153 articles that had utilized the FertiQoL. Following abstract, title, and full-text screenings, 53 articles reported psychometric data and met criteria for inclusion. The FertiQoL is a sound measurement with satisfactory reliability and validity. Studies indicated adequate reliability in the overall scale ( $$\alpha=0.43-0.92$$ α = 0.43 - 0.92 ), as well as the core Emotional, Mind/Body, Social, and Relational scales ( $$\alpha=0.43-0.92$$ α = 0.43 - 0.92 ) and two optional Tolerability and Environment fertility treatment subscales ( $$\alpha=0.67-0.91$$ α = 0.67 - 0.91 ). Although the Relational subscale exhibited slightly lower reliability in several studies, the internal consistency for the measurement as a whole was satisfactory. Results also indicate adequate: 1) face and content validity with extensive professional and patient feedback during development; 2) convergent validity with general quality of life, depression, and anxiety measurements; and 3) structural validity using both confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses. Conclusion The FertiQoL tool is the most commonly used instrument to measure the impact of fertility issues on quality of life in men and women with infertility. Understanding the impact of infertility on quality of life provides valuable insight into the areas of infertility-related care that need to be prioritized, such as mental health or relational stressors. While the instrument has been used in different patient populations with infertility and available in multiple translations, it is necessary to understand the updated psychometric properties and the implications for its use. This review shows that the FertiQoL is reliable and valid for cross-cultural use among individuals with various etiologies of infertility.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T12:46:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bdb118622cb94e6287f2e5c4855e5fb5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1477-7525
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T12:46:32Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
spelling doaj.art-bdb118622cb94e6287f2e5c4855e5fb52023-05-14T11:28:37ZengBMCHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes1477-75252023-05-0121111510.1186/s12955-023-02125-xA review of the psychometric properties and implications for the use of the fertility quality of life toolBrittany M. Woods0Leigh Ann Bray1Sukhkamal Campbell2Aimee Holland3Sylvie Mrug4Sigrid Ladores5University of Alabama at Birmingham School of NursingUniversity of Alabama Capstone College of NursingFertility Preservation Services, University of Alabama at Birmingham MedicineGraduate Clinical Education, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of NursingUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham School of NursingAbstract Objectives To analyze and synthesize the reported psychometric properties of the Fertility Quality of Life (FertiQoL) instrument and describe its implications for use in practice and research in men and women with infertility. Methods A systematic literature search was performed to identify all articles using the FertiQoL tool. PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched from September 2006 through May 2022. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they reported psychometric data on the original FertiQoL tool using a sample population of individuals with infertility. Sample size, country of origin, and psychometric data were documented for each study. Results The initial search revealed 153 articles that had utilized the FertiQoL. Following abstract, title, and full-text screenings, 53 articles reported psychometric data and met criteria for inclusion. The FertiQoL is a sound measurement with satisfactory reliability and validity. Studies indicated adequate reliability in the overall scale ( $$\alpha=0.43-0.92$$ α = 0.43 - 0.92 ), as well as the core Emotional, Mind/Body, Social, and Relational scales ( $$\alpha=0.43-0.92$$ α = 0.43 - 0.92 ) and two optional Tolerability and Environment fertility treatment subscales ( $$\alpha=0.67-0.91$$ α = 0.67 - 0.91 ). Although the Relational subscale exhibited slightly lower reliability in several studies, the internal consistency for the measurement as a whole was satisfactory. Results also indicate adequate: 1) face and content validity with extensive professional and patient feedback during development; 2) convergent validity with general quality of life, depression, and anxiety measurements; and 3) structural validity using both confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses. Conclusion The FertiQoL tool is the most commonly used instrument to measure the impact of fertility issues on quality of life in men and women with infertility. Understanding the impact of infertility on quality of life provides valuable insight into the areas of infertility-related care that need to be prioritized, such as mental health or relational stressors. While the instrument has been used in different patient populations with infertility and available in multiple translations, it is necessary to understand the updated psychometric properties and the implications for its use. This review shows that the FertiQoL is reliable and valid for cross-cultural use among individuals with various etiologies of infertility.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-023-02125-xInfertilityQuality of lifeSystematic reviewPsychometrics
spellingShingle Brittany M. Woods
Leigh Ann Bray
Sukhkamal Campbell
Aimee Holland
Sylvie Mrug
Sigrid Ladores
A review of the psychometric properties and implications for the use of the fertility quality of life tool
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Infertility
Quality of life
Systematic review
Psychometrics
title A review of the psychometric properties and implications for the use of the fertility quality of life tool
title_full A review of the psychometric properties and implications for the use of the fertility quality of life tool
title_fullStr A review of the psychometric properties and implications for the use of the fertility quality of life tool
title_full_unstemmed A review of the psychometric properties and implications for the use of the fertility quality of life tool
title_short A review of the psychometric properties and implications for the use of the fertility quality of life tool
title_sort review of the psychometric properties and implications for the use of the fertility quality of life tool
topic Infertility
Quality of life
Systematic review
Psychometrics
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-023-02125-x
work_keys_str_mv AT brittanymwoods areviewofthepsychometricpropertiesandimplicationsfortheuseofthefertilityqualityoflifetool
AT leighannbray areviewofthepsychometricpropertiesandimplicationsfortheuseofthefertilityqualityoflifetool
AT sukhkamalcampbell areviewofthepsychometricpropertiesandimplicationsfortheuseofthefertilityqualityoflifetool
AT aimeeholland areviewofthepsychometricpropertiesandimplicationsfortheuseofthefertilityqualityoflifetool
AT sylviemrug areviewofthepsychometricpropertiesandimplicationsfortheuseofthefertilityqualityoflifetool
AT sigridladores areviewofthepsychometricpropertiesandimplicationsfortheuseofthefertilityqualityoflifetool
AT brittanymwoods reviewofthepsychometricpropertiesandimplicationsfortheuseofthefertilityqualityoflifetool
AT leighannbray reviewofthepsychometricpropertiesandimplicationsfortheuseofthefertilityqualityoflifetool
AT sukhkamalcampbell reviewofthepsychometricpropertiesandimplicationsfortheuseofthefertilityqualityoflifetool
AT aimeeholland reviewofthepsychometricpropertiesandimplicationsfortheuseofthefertilityqualityoflifetool
AT sylviemrug reviewofthepsychometricpropertiesandimplicationsfortheuseofthefertilityqualityoflifetool
AT sigridladores reviewofthepsychometricpropertiesandimplicationsfortheuseofthefertilityqualityoflifetool