Ningún hombre es una isla.* Meditación en torno a la (im)posibilidad de la responsabilidad moral
The Strawson’s Basic Argument is the stronger against moral responsibility in Philosophy of action. One should be responsible of his identity to be moral responsible of his actions, but then nobody could be never responsible. In this article I criticize orthodox solutions to Strawson’s sceptical cha...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
2006-02-01
|
| Series: | Revista de Filosofia |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RESF/article/view/10341 |
| Summary: | The Strawson’s Basic Argument is the stronger against moral responsibility in Philosophy of action. One should be responsible of his identity to be moral responsible of his actions, but then nobody could be never responsible. In this article I criticize orthodox solutions to Strawson’s sceptical challenge and show how they share with the Argument the same theological notion of monadical agent. A new solution needs a new conception of agent.. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0034-8244 1988-284X |