Low inter-observer agreement among experienced shoulder surgeons assessing overstuffing of glenohumeral resurfacing hemiarthroplasty based on plain radiographs
Abstract Background In a clinical setting, a visual evaluation of post-implant radiographs is often used to assess the restoration of glenohumeral joint anatomy after resurfacing hemiarthroplasty and is a part of the decision-making process, in combination with other parameters, when evaluating pati...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2018-11-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research |
| Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13018-018-1008-6 |
| _version_ | 1798004181770960896 |
|---|---|
| author | Nicolai Sandau Stig Brorson Bo S. Olsen Anne Kathrine Sørensen Steen L. Jensen Kim Schantz Janne Ovesen Jeppe V. Rasmussen |
| author_facet | Nicolai Sandau Stig Brorson Bo S. Olsen Anne Kathrine Sørensen Steen L. Jensen Kim Schantz Janne Ovesen Jeppe V. Rasmussen |
| author_sort | Nicolai Sandau |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background In a clinical setting, a visual evaluation of post-implant radiographs is often used to assess the restoration of glenohumeral joint anatomy after resurfacing hemiarthroplasty and is a part of the decision-making process, in combination with other parameters, when evaluating patients with inferior clinical results. However, the reliability of this method of visual evaluation has not been reported. The aim of this study was to investigate the inter- and intra-observer agreement among experienced shoulder surgeons assessing overstuffing, implant positioning, and size following resurfacing hemiarthroplasty using plain standardized radiographs. Methods Six experienced shoulder surgeons independently classified implant inclination, size of the implant and if the joint seemed overstuffed, in 219 cases of post-implant radiographs. All cases were classified twice 3 weeks apart. Only radiographs with an anterior-posterior projection with a freely visible joint space were used. Non-weighted Cohen’s kappa values were calculated for each coder pair and the mean used as an estimate of the overall inter-observer agreement. Results The overall inter-observer agreement for implant size (kappa, 0.48 and 0.41) and inclination angle was moderate in both rounds (kappa, 0.46 and 0.44), but only a fair agreement was found concerning the evaluation for stuffing of the joint (kappa, 0.24 and 0.28). Intra-observer agreement for implant size and stuffing ranged from fair to substantial while the agreement for inclination was moderate to substantial. Conclusions Our results indicate that a visual evaluation of plain radiographs may be inadequate to evaluate overstuffing, implant positioning, and size following resurfacing hemiarthroplasty using plain standardized radiographs. Future studies may contribute to elucidate whether reliability increases if consensus on clear definitions and standardized methods of evaluation is made. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T12:19:43Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-bdc26ff8ffeb4da78c055ca6abc50dcf |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1749-799X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T12:19:43Z |
| publishDate | 2018-11-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-bdc26ff8ffeb4da78c055ca6abc50dcf2022-12-22T04:24:09ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2018-11-011311710.1186/s13018-018-1008-6Low inter-observer agreement among experienced shoulder surgeons assessing overstuffing of glenohumeral resurfacing hemiarthroplasty based on plain radiographsNicolai Sandau0Stig Brorson1Bo S. Olsen2Anne Kathrine Sørensen3Steen L. Jensen4Kim Schantz5Janne Ovesen6Jeppe V. Rasmussen7Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Herlev & Gentofte HospitalDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Zealand University HospitalDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Herlev & Gentofte HospitalDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Herlev & Gentofte HospitalDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Aalborg University HospitalDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Zealand University HospitalDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Aarhus University HospitalDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Herlev & Gentofte HospitalAbstract Background In a clinical setting, a visual evaluation of post-implant radiographs is often used to assess the restoration of glenohumeral joint anatomy after resurfacing hemiarthroplasty and is a part of the decision-making process, in combination with other parameters, when evaluating patients with inferior clinical results. However, the reliability of this method of visual evaluation has not been reported. The aim of this study was to investigate the inter- and intra-observer agreement among experienced shoulder surgeons assessing overstuffing, implant positioning, and size following resurfacing hemiarthroplasty using plain standardized radiographs. Methods Six experienced shoulder surgeons independently classified implant inclination, size of the implant and if the joint seemed overstuffed, in 219 cases of post-implant radiographs. All cases were classified twice 3 weeks apart. Only radiographs with an anterior-posterior projection with a freely visible joint space were used. Non-weighted Cohen’s kappa values were calculated for each coder pair and the mean used as an estimate of the overall inter-observer agreement. Results The overall inter-observer agreement for implant size (kappa, 0.48 and 0.41) and inclination angle was moderate in both rounds (kappa, 0.46 and 0.44), but only a fair agreement was found concerning the evaluation for stuffing of the joint (kappa, 0.24 and 0.28). Intra-observer agreement for implant size and stuffing ranged from fair to substantial while the agreement for inclination was moderate to substantial. Conclusions Our results indicate that a visual evaluation of plain radiographs may be inadequate to evaluate overstuffing, implant positioning, and size following resurfacing hemiarthroplasty using plain standardized radiographs. Future studies may contribute to elucidate whether reliability increases if consensus on clear definitions and standardized methods of evaluation is made.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13018-018-1008-6 |
| spellingShingle | Nicolai Sandau Stig Brorson Bo S. Olsen Anne Kathrine Sørensen Steen L. Jensen Kim Schantz Janne Ovesen Jeppe V. Rasmussen Low inter-observer agreement among experienced shoulder surgeons assessing overstuffing of glenohumeral resurfacing hemiarthroplasty based on plain radiographs Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research |
| title | Low inter-observer agreement among experienced shoulder surgeons assessing overstuffing of glenohumeral resurfacing hemiarthroplasty based on plain radiographs |
| title_full | Low inter-observer agreement among experienced shoulder surgeons assessing overstuffing of glenohumeral resurfacing hemiarthroplasty based on plain radiographs |
| title_fullStr | Low inter-observer agreement among experienced shoulder surgeons assessing overstuffing of glenohumeral resurfacing hemiarthroplasty based on plain radiographs |
| title_full_unstemmed | Low inter-observer agreement among experienced shoulder surgeons assessing overstuffing of glenohumeral resurfacing hemiarthroplasty based on plain radiographs |
| title_short | Low inter-observer agreement among experienced shoulder surgeons assessing overstuffing of glenohumeral resurfacing hemiarthroplasty based on plain radiographs |
| title_sort | low inter observer agreement among experienced shoulder surgeons assessing overstuffing of glenohumeral resurfacing hemiarthroplasty based on plain radiographs |
| url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13018-018-1008-6 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nicolaisandau lowinterobserveragreementamongexperiencedshouldersurgeonsassessingoverstuffingofglenohumeralresurfacinghemiarthroplastybasedonplainradiographs AT stigbrorson lowinterobserveragreementamongexperiencedshouldersurgeonsassessingoverstuffingofglenohumeralresurfacinghemiarthroplastybasedonplainradiographs AT bosolsen lowinterobserveragreementamongexperiencedshouldersurgeonsassessingoverstuffingofglenohumeralresurfacinghemiarthroplastybasedonplainradiographs AT annekathrinesørensen lowinterobserveragreementamongexperiencedshouldersurgeonsassessingoverstuffingofglenohumeralresurfacinghemiarthroplastybasedonplainradiographs AT steenljensen lowinterobserveragreementamongexperiencedshouldersurgeonsassessingoverstuffingofglenohumeralresurfacinghemiarthroplastybasedonplainradiographs AT kimschantz lowinterobserveragreementamongexperiencedshouldersurgeonsassessingoverstuffingofglenohumeralresurfacinghemiarthroplastybasedonplainradiographs AT janneovesen lowinterobserveragreementamongexperiencedshouldersurgeonsassessingoverstuffingofglenohumeralresurfacinghemiarthroplastybasedonplainradiographs AT jeppevrasmussen lowinterobserveragreementamongexperiencedshouldersurgeonsassessingoverstuffingofglenohumeralresurfacinghemiarthroplastybasedonplainradiographs |