What’s in a Name? Exploring the Nomenclature of Science Communication in the UK [version 2; referees: 1 approved, 3 approved with reservations]
This study, via a consideration of the literature, and a limited survey of active science communicators, presents concise and workable definitions for science outreach, public engagement, widening participation, and knowledge exchange, in a UK context. Sixty-six per cent of participants agreed that...
Main Authors: | Sam Illingworth, James Redfern, Steve Millington, Sam Gray |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
F1000 Research Ltd
2015-09-01
|
Series: | F1000Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://f1000research.com/articles/4-409/v2 |
Similar Items
-
Aiming for long-term, objective-driven science communication in the UK [version 2; referees: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Andreas Prokop, et al.
Published: (2016-12-01) -
Are scientific abstracts written in poetic verse an effective representation of the underlying research? [version 3; referees: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Sam Illingworth
Published: (2016-08-01) -
What is open peer review? A systematic review [version 1; referees: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Tony Ross-Hellauer
Published: (2017-04-01) -
Twittering About Research: A Case Study of the World’s First Twitter Poster Competition [version 3; referees: 3 approved]
by: Edward P. Randviir, et al.
Published: (2016-06-01) -
Looking into Pandora's Box: The Content of Sci-Hub and its Usage [version 1; referees: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
by: Bastian Greshake
Published: (2017-04-01)