Forelimb bone curvature in terrestrial and arboreal mammals

It has recently been proposed that the caudal curvature (concave caudal side) observed in the radioulna of terrestrial quadrupeds is an adaptation to the habitual action of the triceps muscle which causes cranial bending strains (compression on cranial side). The caudal curvature is proposed to be a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Keith Henderson, Jess Pantinople, Kyle McCabe, Hazel L. Richards, Nick Milne
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2017-04-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/3229.pdf
_version_ 1797418894355333120
author Keith Henderson
Jess Pantinople
Kyle McCabe
Hazel L. Richards
Nick Milne
author_facet Keith Henderson
Jess Pantinople
Kyle McCabe
Hazel L. Richards
Nick Milne
author_sort Keith Henderson
collection DOAJ
description It has recently been proposed that the caudal curvature (concave caudal side) observed in the radioulna of terrestrial quadrupeds is an adaptation to the habitual action of the triceps muscle which causes cranial bending strains (compression on cranial side). The caudal curvature is proposed to be adaptive because longitudinal loading induces caudal bending strains (increased compression on the caudal side), and these opposing bending strains counteract each other leaving the radioulna less strained. If this is true for terrestrial quadrupeds, where triceps is required for habitual elbow extension, then we might expect that in arboreal species, where brachialis is habitually required to maintain elbow flexion, the radioulna should instead be cranially curved. This study measures sagittal curvature of the ulna in a range of terrestrial and arboreal primates and marsupials, and finds that their ulnae are curved in opposite directions in these two locomotor categories. This study also examines sagittal curvature in the humerus in the same species, and finds differences that can be attributed to similar adaptations: the bone is curved to counter the habitual muscle action required by the animal’s lifestyle, the difference being mainly in the distal part of the humerus, where arboreal animals tend have a cranial concavity, thought to be in response the carpal and digital muscles that pull cranially on the distal humerus.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T06:39:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bde54d906d264106af4be514b3852142
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2167-8359
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T06:39:34Z
publishDate 2017-04-01
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format Article
series PeerJ
spelling doaj.art-bde54d906d264106af4be514b38521422023-12-03T10:53:55ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592017-04-015e322910.7717/peerj.3229Forelimb bone curvature in terrestrial and arboreal mammalsKeith Henderson0Jess Pantinople1Kyle McCabe2Hazel L. Richards3Nick Milne4School of Anatomy, Physiology and Human Biology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, AustraliaSchool of Anatomy, Physiology and Human Biology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, AustraliaSchool of Anatomy, Physiology and Human Biology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, AustraliaSchool of Anatomy, Physiology and Human Biology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, AustraliaSchool of Anatomy, Physiology and Human Biology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, AustraliaIt has recently been proposed that the caudal curvature (concave caudal side) observed in the radioulna of terrestrial quadrupeds is an adaptation to the habitual action of the triceps muscle which causes cranial bending strains (compression on cranial side). The caudal curvature is proposed to be adaptive because longitudinal loading induces caudal bending strains (increased compression on the caudal side), and these opposing bending strains counteract each other leaving the radioulna less strained. If this is true for terrestrial quadrupeds, where triceps is required for habitual elbow extension, then we might expect that in arboreal species, where brachialis is habitually required to maintain elbow flexion, the radioulna should instead be cranially curved. This study measures sagittal curvature of the ulna in a range of terrestrial and arboreal primates and marsupials, and finds that their ulnae are curved in opposite directions in these two locomotor categories. This study also examines sagittal curvature in the humerus in the same species, and finds differences that can be attributed to similar adaptations: the bone is curved to counter the habitual muscle action required by the animal’s lifestyle, the difference being mainly in the distal part of the humerus, where arboreal animals tend have a cranial concavity, thought to be in response the carpal and digital muscles that pull cranially on the distal humerus.https://peerj.com/articles/3229.pdfHumerusUlnaCurvatureArborealTerrestrialAdaptation
spellingShingle Keith Henderson
Jess Pantinople
Kyle McCabe
Hazel L. Richards
Nick Milne
Forelimb bone curvature in terrestrial and arboreal mammals
PeerJ
Humerus
Ulna
Curvature
Arboreal
Terrestrial
Adaptation
title Forelimb bone curvature in terrestrial and arboreal mammals
title_full Forelimb bone curvature in terrestrial and arboreal mammals
title_fullStr Forelimb bone curvature in terrestrial and arboreal mammals
title_full_unstemmed Forelimb bone curvature in terrestrial and arboreal mammals
title_short Forelimb bone curvature in terrestrial and arboreal mammals
title_sort forelimb bone curvature in terrestrial and arboreal mammals
topic Humerus
Ulna
Curvature
Arboreal
Terrestrial
Adaptation
url https://peerj.com/articles/3229.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT keithhenderson forelimbbonecurvatureinterrestrialandarborealmammals
AT jesspantinople forelimbbonecurvatureinterrestrialandarborealmammals
AT kylemccabe forelimbbonecurvatureinterrestrialandarborealmammals
AT hazellrichards forelimbbonecurvatureinterrestrialandarborealmammals
AT nickmilne forelimbbonecurvatureinterrestrialandarborealmammals