Advance Care Directives: A Herzl Clinic Quality Improvement Project on Patients' perspectives

Background: Advance Care Planning (ACP) has benefits for patients and is often optimal when done in the primary care setting. Despite the development of multiple resources and tools to support ACP discussions at our Family Medicine Teaching Clinic, the initiation and documentation of Advance Care D...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fanny Hersson-Edery
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: McGill University 2023-11-01
Series:McGill Journal of Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://mjm.mcgill.ca/article/view/1036
_version_ 1797434927615049728
author Fanny Hersson-Edery
author_facet Fanny Hersson-Edery
author_sort Fanny Hersson-Edery
collection DOAJ
description Background: Advance Care Planning (ACP) has benefits for patients and is often optimal when done in the primary care setting. Despite the development of multiple resources and tools to support ACP discussions at our Family Medicine Teaching Clinic, the initiation and documentation of Advance Care Directives (ACD) in patients’ medical files were low and resident physicians had perceived that patients were unwilling or unprepared for ACP discussions. The goal of this project was to understand the challenges and barriers that patients and their caregivers face in initiating and discussing ACD with their primary care team. Methods: An online survey was conducted among 78 patients who are part of the Home Care program at the Herzl clinic. Participants were asked about the value placed on ACP and their preferences on various aspects surrounding the initiation of ACD discussions. Results: 25 of 78 possible responses were received. This included survey responses from 6 patients, 13 caregivers, 4 family members and 2 physicians. Our results show that patients and their caregivers value Advance Care Planning discussions (>80%). Additionally, they endorse multiple benefits of ACP for themselves, their care teams and families. Patients and caregivers prefer that medical professionals initiate and facilitate the discussions (70-80%) and are open to receive educational material to prepare for these discussions (68%). Conclusion: Patients in a frail population are willing and open to discuss advance care planning with their primary care team. Family Medicine teaching clinics can support patients’ desire to engage in ACP by providing access to education material and initiating these discussions. 
first_indexed 2024-03-09T10:39:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bde92d1762f04d2081857eeb795e1189
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1201-026X
1715-8125
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T10:39:57Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher McGill University
record_format Article
series McGill Journal of Medicine
spelling doaj.art-bde92d1762f04d2081857eeb795e11892023-12-01T17:06:54ZengMcGill UniversityMcGill Journal of Medicine1201-026X1715-81252023-11-0121110.26443/mjm.v21i1.1036Advance Care Directives: A Herzl Clinic Quality Improvement Project on Patients' perspectivesFanny Hersson-Edery0McGill Family Medicine Background: Advance Care Planning (ACP) has benefits for patients and is often optimal when done in the primary care setting. Despite the development of multiple resources and tools to support ACP discussions at our Family Medicine Teaching Clinic, the initiation and documentation of Advance Care Directives (ACD) in patients’ medical files were low and resident physicians had perceived that patients were unwilling or unprepared for ACP discussions. The goal of this project was to understand the challenges and barriers that patients and their caregivers face in initiating and discussing ACD with their primary care team. Methods: An online survey was conducted among 78 patients who are part of the Home Care program at the Herzl clinic. Participants were asked about the value placed on ACP and their preferences on various aspects surrounding the initiation of ACD discussions. Results: 25 of 78 possible responses were received. This included survey responses from 6 patients, 13 caregivers, 4 family members and 2 physicians. Our results show that patients and their caregivers value Advance Care Planning discussions (>80%). Additionally, they endorse multiple benefits of ACP for themselves, their care teams and families. Patients and caregivers prefer that medical professionals initiate and facilitate the discussions (70-80%) and are open to receive educational material to prepare for these discussions (68%). Conclusion: Patients in a frail population are willing and open to discuss advance care planning with their primary care team. Family Medicine teaching clinics can support patients’ desire to engage in ACP by providing access to education material and initiating these discussions.  https://mjm.mcgill.ca/article/view/1036OutpatientsAdvance Care DirectivesAdvance Care Planning
spellingShingle Fanny Hersson-Edery
Advance Care Directives: A Herzl Clinic Quality Improvement Project on Patients' perspectives
McGill Journal of Medicine
Outpatients
Advance Care Directives
Advance Care Planning
title Advance Care Directives: A Herzl Clinic Quality Improvement Project on Patients' perspectives
title_full Advance Care Directives: A Herzl Clinic Quality Improvement Project on Patients' perspectives
title_fullStr Advance Care Directives: A Herzl Clinic Quality Improvement Project on Patients' perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Advance Care Directives: A Herzl Clinic Quality Improvement Project on Patients' perspectives
title_short Advance Care Directives: A Herzl Clinic Quality Improvement Project on Patients' perspectives
title_sort advance care directives a herzl clinic quality improvement project on patients perspectives
topic Outpatients
Advance Care Directives
Advance Care Planning
url https://mjm.mcgill.ca/article/view/1036
work_keys_str_mv AT fannyherssonedery advancecaredirectivesaherzlclinicqualityimprovementprojectonpatientsperspectives