Predictors of clinical outcomes in space-occupying cerebellar infarction undergoing suboccipital decompressive craniectomy

IntroductionDespite current clinical guidelines recommending suboccipital decompressive craniectomy (SDC) in cerebellar infarction when patients present with neurological deterioration, the precise definition of neurological deterioration remains unclear and accurate timing of SDC can be challenging...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kristin Lucia, Sarah Reitz, Elke Hattingen, Helmuth Steinmetz, Volker Seifert, Marcus Czabanka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2023.1165258/full
_version_ 1827965928458944512
author Kristin Lucia
Sarah Reitz
Elke Hattingen
Helmuth Steinmetz
Volker Seifert
Marcus Czabanka
author_facet Kristin Lucia
Sarah Reitz
Elke Hattingen
Helmuth Steinmetz
Volker Seifert
Marcus Czabanka
author_sort Kristin Lucia
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionDespite current clinical guidelines recommending suboccipital decompressive craniectomy (SDC) in cerebellar infarction when patients present with neurological deterioration, the precise definition of neurological deterioration remains unclear and accurate timing of SDC can be challenging. The current study aimed at characterizing whether clinical outcomes can be predicted by the GCS score immediately prior to SDC and whether higher GCS scores are associated with better clinical outcomes.MethodsIn a single-center, retrospective analysis of 51 patients treated with SDC for space-occupying cerebellar infarction, clinical and imaging data were evaluated at the time points of symptom onset, hospital admission, and preoperatively. Clinical outcomes were measured by the mRS. Preoperative GCS scores were stratified into three groups (GCS, 3–8, 9–11, and 12–15). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed using clinical and radiological parameters as predictors of clinical outcomes.ResultsIn cox regression analysis GCS scores of 12–15 at surgery were significant predictors of positive clinical outcomes (mRS, 1–2). For GCS scores of 3–8 and 9–11, no significant increase in proportional hazard ratios was observed. Negative clinical outcomes (mRS, 3–6) were associated with infarct volume above 6.0 cm3, tonsillar herniation, brainstem compression, and a preoperative GCS score of 3–8 [HR, 2.386 (CI, 1.160–4.906); p = 0.018].ConclusionOur preliminary findings suggest that SDC should be considered in patients with infarct volumes above 6.0 cm3 and with GCS between 12 and 15, as these patients may show better long-term outcomes than those in whom surgery is delayed until a GCS score below 11.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T17:42:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bdeb62da6f884d7fbbc071f145aff8c2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-2295
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T17:42:03Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neurology
spelling doaj.art-bdeb62da6f884d7fbbc071f145aff8c22023-04-17T04:52:07ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurology1664-22952023-04-011410.3389/fneur.2023.11652581165258Predictors of clinical outcomes in space-occupying cerebellar infarction undergoing suboccipital decompressive craniectomyKristin Lucia0Sarah Reitz1Elke Hattingen2Helmuth Steinmetz3Volker Seifert4Marcus Czabanka5Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, GermanyDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, GermanyDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Hospital, Frankfurt, GermanyDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, GermanyDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, GermanyDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, GermanyIntroductionDespite current clinical guidelines recommending suboccipital decompressive craniectomy (SDC) in cerebellar infarction when patients present with neurological deterioration, the precise definition of neurological deterioration remains unclear and accurate timing of SDC can be challenging. The current study aimed at characterizing whether clinical outcomes can be predicted by the GCS score immediately prior to SDC and whether higher GCS scores are associated with better clinical outcomes.MethodsIn a single-center, retrospective analysis of 51 patients treated with SDC for space-occupying cerebellar infarction, clinical and imaging data were evaluated at the time points of symptom onset, hospital admission, and preoperatively. Clinical outcomes were measured by the mRS. Preoperative GCS scores were stratified into three groups (GCS, 3–8, 9–11, and 12–15). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed using clinical and radiological parameters as predictors of clinical outcomes.ResultsIn cox regression analysis GCS scores of 12–15 at surgery were significant predictors of positive clinical outcomes (mRS, 1–2). For GCS scores of 3–8 and 9–11, no significant increase in proportional hazard ratios was observed. Negative clinical outcomes (mRS, 3–6) were associated with infarct volume above 6.0 cm3, tonsillar herniation, brainstem compression, and a preoperative GCS score of 3–8 [HR, 2.386 (CI, 1.160–4.906); p = 0.018].ConclusionOur preliminary findings suggest that SDC should be considered in patients with infarct volumes above 6.0 cm3 and with GCS between 12 and 15, as these patients may show better long-term outcomes than those in whom surgery is delayed until a GCS score below 11.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2023.1165258/fullcerebellarsuboccipital decompressive craniectomyGCSoutcomepredictors
spellingShingle Kristin Lucia
Sarah Reitz
Elke Hattingen
Helmuth Steinmetz
Volker Seifert
Marcus Czabanka
Predictors of clinical outcomes in space-occupying cerebellar infarction undergoing suboccipital decompressive craniectomy
Frontiers in Neurology
cerebellar
suboccipital decompressive craniectomy
GCS
outcome
predictors
title Predictors of clinical outcomes in space-occupying cerebellar infarction undergoing suboccipital decompressive craniectomy
title_full Predictors of clinical outcomes in space-occupying cerebellar infarction undergoing suboccipital decompressive craniectomy
title_fullStr Predictors of clinical outcomes in space-occupying cerebellar infarction undergoing suboccipital decompressive craniectomy
title_full_unstemmed Predictors of clinical outcomes in space-occupying cerebellar infarction undergoing suboccipital decompressive craniectomy
title_short Predictors of clinical outcomes in space-occupying cerebellar infarction undergoing suboccipital decompressive craniectomy
title_sort predictors of clinical outcomes in space occupying cerebellar infarction undergoing suboccipital decompressive craniectomy
topic cerebellar
suboccipital decompressive craniectomy
GCS
outcome
predictors
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2023.1165258/full
work_keys_str_mv AT kristinlucia predictorsofclinicaloutcomesinspaceoccupyingcerebellarinfarctionundergoingsuboccipitaldecompressivecraniectomy
AT sarahreitz predictorsofclinicaloutcomesinspaceoccupyingcerebellarinfarctionundergoingsuboccipitaldecompressivecraniectomy
AT elkehattingen predictorsofclinicaloutcomesinspaceoccupyingcerebellarinfarctionundergoingsuboccipitaldecompressivecraniectomy
AT helmuthsteinmetz predictorsofclinicaloutcomesinspaceoccupyingcerebellarinfarctionundergoingsuboccipitaldecompressivecraniectomy
AT volkerseifert predictorsofclinicaloutcomesinspaceoccupyingcerebellarinfarctionundergoingsuboccipitaldecompressivecraniectomy
AT marcusczabanka predictorsofclinicaloutcomesinspaceoccupyingcerebellarinfarctionundergoingsuboccipitaldecompressivecraniectomy