Comparison of the Nonlinear Dynamic Pre- and Post-LED Equalization
Visible Light Communications (VLC) have gained much popularity lately. In such a system, a white LED (Light-Emitting Diode) plays a double role as a light source and a transmitter. The main problem here is that the LED exhibits a low bandwidth and high nonlinearity, so the equalization of the LED no...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2022-02-01
|
| Series: | Sensors |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/5/1782 |
| _version_ | 1827650695105347584 |
|---|---|
| author | Jerzy Siuzdak |
| author_facet | Jerzy Siuzdak |
| author_sort | Jerzy Siuzdak |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Visible Light Communications (VLC) have gained much popularity lately. In such a system, a white LED (Light-Emitting Diode) plays a double role as a light source and a transmitter. The main problem here is that the LED exhibits a low bandwidth and high nonlinearity, so the equalization of the LED nonlinear dynamic response is necessary. For this, various equalizers are used. This paper compares the pre- and post-equalizer performance in terms of the received signal quality for a channel that includes a nonlinear element of limited bandwidth, such as an LED. Multilevel Pulse Amplitude Modulation (PAM) was selected as the signal format, as well as a variant of the Volterra series equalizer as the compensating element. The results obtained may be used for the correction of the dynamic characteristics of LEDs applied in VLC systems. For the sake of comparison, we used Modulation Error Ratio (MER) values at the receiver output. The dynamic nonlinear behavior was modeled by a Wiener–Hammerstein device, whereas the post/pre-equalizer was based on the dynamic deviation reduction-based Volterra series. The obtained results indicate that the post- and pre-equalizer performed comparably for the linear/moderately nonlinear channels and for a high noise level. In the case of high nonlinearity and a large SNR (Signal–to–Noise Ratio) values, the post-equalizer performed somewhat better in terms of MER by a few dB at maximum. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-09T20:22:38Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-be12f76e437148e583e6c731fb5c29aa |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1424-8220 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-09T20:22:38Z |
| publishDate | 2022-02-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Sensors |
| spelling | doaj.art-be12f76e437148e583e6c731fb5c29aa2023-11-23T23:46:04ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202022-02-01225178210.3390/s22051782Comparison of the Nonlinear Dynamic Pre- and Post-LED EqualizationJerzy Siuzdak0Institute of Telecommunications, Warsaw University of Technology, Nowowiejska 15/19, 00-665 Warsaw, PolandVisible Light Communications (VLC) have gained much popularity lately. In such a system, a white LED (Light-Emitting Diode) plays a double role as a light source and a transmitter. The main problem here is that the LED exhibits a low bandwidth and high nonlinearity, so the equalization of the LED nonlinear dynamic response is necessary. For this, various equalizers are used. This paper compares the pre- and post-equalizer performance in terms of the received signal quality for a channel that includes a nonlinear element of limited bandwidth, such as an LED. Multilevel Pulse Amplitude Modulation (PAM) was selected as the signal format, as well as a variant of the Volterra series equalizer as the compensating element. The results obtained may be used for the correction of the dynamic characteristics of LEDs applied in VLC systems. For the sake of comparison, we used Modulation Error Ratio (MER) values at the receiver output. The dynamic nonlinear behavior was modeled by a Wiener–Hammerstein device, whereas the post/pre-equalizer was based on the dynamic deviation reduction-based Volterra series. The obtained results indicate that the post- and pre-equalizer performed comparably for the linear/moderately nonlinear channels and for a high noise level. In the case of high nonlinearity and a large SNR (Signal–to–Noise Ratio) values, the post-equalizer performed somewhat better in terms of MER by a few dB at maximum.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/5/1782visible light communicationsLEDdynamic nonlinearityequalization |
| spellingShingle | Jerzy Siuzdak Comparison of the Nonlinear Dynamic Pre- and Post-LED Equalization Sensors visible light communications LED dynamic nonlinearity equalization |
| title | Comparison of the Nonlinear Dynamic Pre- and Post-LED Equalization |
| title_full | Comparison of the Nonlinear Dynamic Pre- and Post-LED Equalization |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of the Nonlinear Dynamic Pre- and Post-LED Equalization |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the Nonlinear Dynamic Pre- and Post-LED Equalization |
| title_short | Comparison of the Nonlinear Dynamic Pre- and Post-LED Equalization |
| title_sort | comparison of the nonlinear dynamic pre and post led equalization |
| topic | visible light communications LED dynamic nonlinearity equalization |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/5/1782 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jerzysiuzdak comparisonofthenonlineardynamicpreandpostledequalization |