Gap Effect for Manual Responses in Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Temporal Aspects of Attentional Disengagement, Cognitive aging, and the Test for Attentional Bias Toward Infant Faces

This study examined factors influencing the gap effect, a phenomenon where the saccadic latency is faster when the fixation point disappears than when it overlaps with the target. The gap effect has been used in basic attentional research, as well as in developmental, neurophysiological, and compara...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mikuho Yokoyama, Yuri Kawaguchi, Masaki Tomonaga
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Animal Behavior and Cognition 2024-02-01
Series:Animal Behavior and Cognition
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.animalbehaviorandcognition.org/uploads/journals/55/2%20Yokoyama_ABC_11(1).pdf
_version_ 1797302826622255104
author Mikuho Yokoyama
Yuri Kawaguchi
Masaki Tomonaga
author_facet Mikuho Yokoyama
Yuri Kawaguchi
Masaki Tomonaga
author_sort Mikuho Yokoyama
collection DOAJ
description This study examined factors influencing the gap effect, a phenomenon where the saccadic latency is faster when the fixation point disappears than when it overlaps with the target. The gap effect has been used in basic attentional research, as well as in developmental, neurophysiological, and comparative research. This effect is found not only in oculomotor tasks but also in manual response tasks in humans. In this study, we conducted a gap-overlap task using manual spatially orienting responses in chimpanzees and examined several factors that influence this effect. The results confirmed the gap effect for manual orienting responses in chimpanzees. Response times for gap trials showed a floor effect at around the gap with 200 ms and more. The duration of the fixation point did not affect the gap effect, although it did affect the chimpanzees’ response times. The presence or absence of auditory stimuli at the fixation point offset did not affect the gap effect. We also analyzed the data from two geriatric individuals (51 years old) who participated in this study and confirmed the usefulness of this effect for studying comparative cognitive-aging studies. In a second task we examined attentional bias for infant faces, an effect which has been reported in humans. However, while a gap effect was observed overall, there was no significant difference in the gap effect among stimulus types.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T23:43:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-be198c2117d74a4192e79e1794965e39
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2372-4323
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T23:43:35Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher Animal Behavior and Cognition
record_format Article
series Animal Behavior and Cognition
spelling doaj.art-be198c2117d74a4192e79e1794965e392024-02-19T22:18:38ZengAnimal Behavior and CognitionAnimal Behavior and Cognition2372-43232024-02-01111244910.26451/abc.11.01.02.2024Gap Effect for Manual Responses in Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Temporal Aspects of Attentional Disengagement, Cognitive aging, and the Test for Attentional Bias Toward Infant FacesMikuho YokoyamaYuri KawaguchiMasaki TomonagaThis study examined factors influencing the gap effect, a phenomenon where the saccadic latency is faster when the fixation point disappears than when it overlaps with the target. The gap effect has been used in basic attentional research, as well as in developmental, neurophysiological, and comparative research. This effect is found not only in oculomotor tasks but also in manual response tasks in humans. In this study, we conducted a gap-overlap task using manual spatially orienting responses in chimpanzees and examined several factors that influence this effect. The results confirmed the gap effect for manual orienting responses in chimpanzees. Response times for gap trials showed a floor effect at around the gap with 200 ms and more. The duration of the fixation point did not affect the gap effect, although it did affect the chimpanzees’ response times. The presence or absence of auditory stimuli at the fixation point offset did not affect the gap effect. We also analyzed the data from two geriatric individuals (51 years old) who participated in this study and confirmed the usefulness of this effect for studying comparative cognitive-aging studies. In a second task we examined attentional bias for infant faces, an effect which has been reported in humans. However, while a gap effect was observed overall, there was no significant difference in the gap effect among stimulus types.https://www.animalbehaviorandcognition.org/uploads/journals/55/2%20Yokoyama_ABC_11(1).pdfchimpanzeesgap effectattentioncognitive aginginfant face
spellingShingle Mikuho Yokoyama
Yuri Kawaguchi
Masaki Tomonaga
Gap Effect for Manual Responses in Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Temporal Aspects of Attentional Disengagement, Cognitive aging, and the Test for Attentional Bias Toward Infant Faces
Animal Behavior and Cognition
chimpanzees
gap effect
attention
cognitive aging
infant face
title Gap Effect for Manual Responses in Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Temporal Aspects of Attentional Disengagement, Cognitive aging, and the Test for Attentional Bias Toward Infant Faces
title_full Gap Effect for Manual Responses in Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Temporal Aspects of Attentional Disengagement, Cognitive aging, and the Test for Attentional Bias Toward Infant Faces
title_fullStr Gap Effect for Manual Responses in Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Temporal Aspects of Attentional Disengagement, Cognitive aging, and the Test for Attentional Bias Toward Infant Faces
title_full_unstemmed Gap Effect for Manual Responses in Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Temporal Aspects of Attentional Disengagement, Cognitive aging, and the Test for Attentional Bias Toward Infant Faces
title_short Gap Effect for Manual Responses in Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Temporal Aspects of Attentional Disengagement, Cognitive aging, and the Test for Attentional Bias Toward Infant Faces
title_sort gap effect for manual responses in chimpanzees pan troglodytes temporal aspects of attentional disengagement cognitive aging and the test for attentional bias toward infant faces
topic chimpanzees
gap effect
attention
cognitive aging
infant face
url https://www.animalbehaviorandcognition.org/uploads/journals/55/2%20Yokoyama_ABC_11(1).pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mikuhoyokoyama gapeffectformanualresponsesinchimpanzeespantroglodytestemporalaspectsofattentionaldisengagementcognitiveagingandthetestforattentionalbiastowardinfantfaces
AT yurikawaguchi gapeffectformanualresponsesinchimpanzeespantroglodytestemporalaspectsofattentionaldisengagementcognitiveagingandthetestforattentionalbiastowardinfantfaces
AT masakitomonaga gapeffectformanualresponsesinchimpanzeespantroglodytestemporalaspectsofattentionaldisengagementcognitiveagingandthetestforattentionalbiastowardinfantfaces