Comparison of the left and right ventricular size and systolic function of low-risk fetuses in the third trimester: Which is more dominant?

ObjectiveTo quantify fetal cardiovascular parameters utilizing fetal-specific 2D speckle tracking technique and to explore the differences in size and systolic function of the left and right ventricles in low-risk pregnancy.MethodsA prospective cohort study was performed in 453 low-risk single fetus...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chen Zhu, Man Li, Cheng-Jie Xu, Meng-Juan Ding, Yu Xiong, Rui Liu, Yun-Yun Ren
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1052178/full
_version_ 1797868237189283840
author Chen Zhu
Man Li
Cheng-Jie Xu
Meng-Juan Ding
Yu Xiong
Rui Liu
Yun-Yun Ren
author_facet Chen Zhu
Man Li
Cheng-Jie Xu
Meng-Juan Ding
Yu Xiong
Rui Liu
Yun-Yun Ren
author_sort Chen Zhu
collection DOAJ
description ObjectiveTo quantify fetal cardiovascular parameters utilizing fetal-specific 2D speckle tracking technique and to explore the differences in size and systolic function of the left and right ventricles in low-risk pregnancy.MethodsA prospective cohort study was performed in 453 low-risk single fetuses (28+0–39+6 weeks) to evaluate ventricular size [i.e., end-diastolic length (EDL), end-systolic length (ESL), end-diastolic diameter (ED), end-systolic diameter (ES), end-diastolic area, end-systolic area, end-diastolic volume (EDV), and end-systolic volume (ESV)] and systolic function [i.e., ejection fraction (EF), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), cardiac output per kilogram (CO/KG), and stroke volume per kilogram (SV/KG)].ResultsThis study showed that (1) the reproducibility of the interobserver and intraobserver measurements was good to excellent (ICC 0.626–0.936); (2) with advancing gestation, fetal ventricular size and systolic function increased, whereas right ventricular (RV) EF decreased and left ventricular (LV) EF was not significantly changed; (3) LV length was longer than RV length in diastole (2.24 vs. 1.96 cm, P < 0.001) and systole (1.72 vs. 1.52 cm, P < 0.001); (4) LV ED-S1 and ES-S1 were shorter than the RV ED-S1 and ES-S1 (12.87 vs. 13.43 mm, P < 0.001; 5.09 vs. 5.61 mm, P < 0.001); (5) there were no differences between the LV and RV in EDA or EDV; (6) the mean EDV ratio of right-to-left ventricle was 1.076 (95% CI, 1.038–1.114), and the mean ESV ratio was 1.628 (95% CI, 1.555–1.701); (7) the EF, CO and SV of the LV were greater than the RV (EF: 62.69% vs. 46.09%, P < 0.001; CO: 167.85 vs. 128.69 ml, P < 0.001; SV: 1.18 vs. 0.88 ml, P < 0.001); (8) SV and CO increased with ED-S1 and EDL, but EF was not significantly changed.ConclusionLow-risk fetal cardiovascular physiology is characterized by a larger RV volume (especially after 32 weeks) and greater LV outputs (EF, CO, SV, SV/KG and CO/KG).
first_indexed 2024-04-09T23:53:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-be1c1be75e044605a6f27d0fffc82ba5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2297-055X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T23:53:54Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
spelling doaj.art-be1c1be75e044605a6f27d0fffc82ba52023-03-17T04:34:32ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine2297-055X2023-03-011010.3389/fcvm.2023.10521781052178Comparison of the left and right ventricular size and systolic function of low-risk fetuses in the third trimester: Which is more dominant?Chen Zhu0Man Li1Cheng-Jie Xu2Meng-Juan Ding3Yu Xiong4Rui Liu5Yun-Yun Ren6Department of Ultrasound, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Ultrasound, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Information Technology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Ultrasound, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Ultrasound, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Ultrasound, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, ChinaObjectiveTo quantify fetal cardiovascular parameters utilizing fetal-specific 2D speckle tracking technique and to explore the differences in size and systolic function of the left and right ventricles in low-risk pregnancy.MethodsA prospective cohort study was performed in 453 low-risk single fetuses (28+0–39+6 weeks) to evaluate ventricular size [i.e., end-diastolic length (EDL), end-systolic length (ESL), end-diastolic diameter (ED), end-systolic diameter (ES), end-diastolic area, end-systolic area, end-diastolic volume (EDV), and end-systolic volume (ESV)] and systolic function [i.e., ejection fraction (EF), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), cardiac output per kilogram (CO/KG), and stroke volume per kilogram (SV/KG)].ResultsThis study showed that (1) the reproducibility of the interobserver and intraobserver measurements was good to excellent (ICC 0.626–0.936); (2) with advancing gestation, fetal ventricular size and systolic function increased, whereas right ventricular (RV) EF decreased and left ventricular (LV) EF was not significantly changed; (3) LV length was longer than RV length in diastole (2.24 vs. 1.96 cm, P < 0.001) and systole (1.72 vs. 1.52 cm, P < 0.001); (4) LV ED-S1 and ES-S1 were shorter than the RV ED-S1 and ES-S1 (12.87 vs. 13.43 mm, P < 0.001; 5.09 vs. 5.61 mm, P < 0.001); (5) there were no differences between the LV and RV in EDA or EDV; (6) the mean EDV ratio of right-to-left ventricle was 1.076 (95% CI, 1.038–1.114), and the mean ESV ratio was 1.628 (95% CI, 1.555–1.701); (7) the EF, CO and SV of the LV were greater than the RV (EF: 62.69% vs. 46.09%, P < 0.001; CO: 167.85 vs. 128.69 ml, P < 0.001; SV: 1.18 vs. 0.88 ml, P < 0.001); (8) SV and CO increased with ED-S1 and EDL, but EF was not significantly changed.ConclusionLow-risk fetal cardiovascular physiology is characterized by a larger RV volume (especially after 32 weeks) and greater LV outputs (EF, CO, SV, SV/KG and CO/KG).https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1052178/fullfetal echocardiographyfetal heartultrasoundspeckle trackingfetalHQventricular size
spellingShingle Chen Zhu
Man Li
Cheng-Jie Xu
Meng-Juan Ding
Yu Xiong
Rui Liu
Yun-Yun Ren
Comparison of the left and right ventricular size and systolic function of low-risk fetuses in the third trimester: Which is more dominant?
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
fetal echocardiography
fetal heart
ultrasound
speckle tracking
fetalHQ
ventricular size
title Comparison of the left and right ventricular size and systolic function of low-risk fetuses in the third trimester: Which is more dominant?
title_full Comparison of the left and right ventricular size and systolic function of low-risk fetuses in the third trimester: Which is more dominant?
title_fullStr Comparison of the left and right ventricular size and systolic function of low-risk fetuses in the third trimester: Which is more dominant?
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the left and right ventricular size and systolic function of low-risk fetuses in the third trimester: Which is more dominant?
title_short Comparison of the left and right ventricular size and systolic function of low-risk fetuses in the third trimester: Which is more dominant?
title_sort comparison of the left and right ventricular size and systolic function of low risk fetuses in the third trimester which is more dominant
topic fetal echocardiography
fetal heart
ultrasound
speckle tracking
fetalHQ
ventricular size
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1052178/full
work_keys_str_mv AT chenzhu comparisonoftheleftandrightventricularsizeandsystolicfunctionoflowriskfetusesinthethirdtrimesterwhichismoredominant
AT manli comparisonoftheleftandrightventricularsizeandsystolicfunctionoflowriskfetusesinthethirdtrimesterwhichismoredominant
AT chengjiexu comparisonoftheleftandrightventricularsizeandsystolicfunctionoflowriskfetusesinthethirdtrimesterwhichismoredominant
AT mengjuanding comparisonoftheleftandrightventricularsizeandsystolicfunctionoflowriskfetusesinthethirdtrimesterwhichismoredominant
AT yuxiong comparisonoftheleftandrightventricularsizeandsystolicfunctionoflowriskfetusesinthethirdtrimesterwhichismoredominant
AT ruiliu comparisonoftheleftandrightventricularsizeandsystolicfunctionoflowriskfetusesinthethirdtrimesterwhichismoredominant
AT yunyunren comparisonoftheleftandrightventricularsizeandsystolicfunctionoflowriskfetusesinthethirdtrimesterwhichismoredominant