Effects of communicating uncertainty descriptions in hazard identification, risk characterization, and risk protection.

Uncertainty is a crucial issue for any risk assessment. Consequently, it also poses crucial challenges for risk communications. Many guidebooks advise reporting uncertainties in risk assessments, expecting that the audience will appreciate this disclosure. However, the empirical evidence about the e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter Wiedemann, Franziska U Boerner, Frederik Freudenstein
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253762
_version_ 1818834571990401024
author Peter Wiedemann
Franziska U Boerner
Frederik Freudenstein
author_facet Peter Wiedemann
Franziska U Boerner
Frederik Freudenstein
author_sort Peter Wiedemann
collection DOAJ
description Uncertainty is a crucial issue for any risk assessment. Consequently, it also poses crucial challenges for risk communications. Many guidebooks advise reporting uncertainties in risk assessments, expecting that the audience will appreciate this disclosure. However, the empirical evidence about the effects of uncertainty reporting is sparse and inconclusive. Therefore, based on examples of potential health risks of electromagnetic fields (EMF), three experiments were conducted analysing the effects of communicating uncertainties separately for hazard identification, risk characterisation and risk protection. The setups aimed to explore how reporting and how explaining of uncertainty affects dependent variables such as risk perception, perceived competence of the risk assessors, and trust in risk management. Each of the three experiments used a 2x2 design with a first factor presenting uncertainty descriptions (as used in public controversies on EMF related health effects) or describing a certainty conditions; and a second factor explaining the causes of uncertainties (by pointing at knowledge gaps) or not explaining them. The study results indicate that qualitative uncertainty descriptions regarding hazard identification reduce the confidence in the professional competencies of the assessors. In contrast, a quantitative uncertainty description in risk characterisation-regarding the magnitude of the risk-does not affect any of the dependent variables. Concerning risk protection, trust in exposure limit values is not affected by qualitative uncertainty information. However, the qualitative description of uncertainty regarding the adequacy of protection amplifies fears. Furthermore, explaining this uncertainty results in lower text understandability.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T02:36:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-be2147a8bb0e4dbb9da6eec4a089f6fb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T02:36:57Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-be2147a8bb0e4dbb9da6eec4a089f6fb2022-12-21T20:39:20ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01167e025376210.1371/journal.pone.0253762Effects of communicating uncertainty descriptions in hazard identification, risk characterization, and risk protection.Peter WiedemannFranziska U BoernerFrederik FreudensteinUncertainty is a crucial issue for any risk assessment. Consequently, it also poses crucial challenges for risk communications. Many guidebooks advise reporting uncertainties in risk assessments, expecting that the audience will appreciate this disclosure. However, the empirical evidence about the effects of uncertainty reporting is sparse and inconclusive. Therefore, based on examples of potential health risks of electromagnetic fields (EMF), three experiments were conducted analysing the effects of communicating uncertainties separately for hazard identification, risk characterisation and risk protection. The setups aimed to explore how reporting and how explaining of uncertainty affects dependent variables such as risk perception, perceived competence of the risk assessors, and trust in risk management. Each of the three experiments used a 2x2 design with a first factor presenting uncertainty descriptions (as used in public controversies on EMF related health effects) or describing a certainty conditions; and a second factor explaining the causes of uncertainties (by pointing at knowledge gaps) or not explaining them. The study results indicate that qualitative uncertainty descriptions regarding hazard identification reduce the confidence in the professional competencies of the assessors. In contrast, a quantitative uncertainty description in risk characterisation-regarding the magnitude of the risk-does not affect any of the dependent variables. Concerning risk protection, trust in exposure limit values is not affected by qualitative uncertainty information. However, the qualitative description of uncertainty regarding the adequacy of protection amplifies fears. Furthermore, explaining this uncertainty results in lower text understandability.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253762
spellingShingle Peter Wiedemann
Franziska U Boerner
Frederik Freudenstein
Effects of communicating uncertainty descriptions in hazard identification, risk characterization, and risk protection.
PLoS ONE
title Effects of communicating uncertainty descriptions in hazard identification, risk characterization, and risk protection.
title_full Effects of communicating uncertainty descriptions in hazard identification, risk characterization, and risk protection.
title_fullStr Effects of communicating uncertainty descriptions in hazard identification, risk characterization, and risk protection.
title_full_unstemmed Effects of communicating uncertainty descriptions in hazard identification, risk characterization, and risk protection.
title_short Effects of communicating uncertainty descriptions in hazard identification, risk characterization, and risk protection.
title_sort effects of communicating uncertainty descriptions in hazard identification risk characterization and risk protection
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253762
work_keys_str_mv AT peterwiedemann effectsofcommunicatinguncertaintydescriptionsinhazardidentificationriskcharacterizationandriskprotection
AT franziskauboerner effectsofcommunicatinguncertaintydescriptionsinhazardidentificationriskcharacterizationandriskprotection
AT frederikfreudenstein effectsofcommunicatinguncertaintydescriptionsinhazardidentificationriskcharacterizationandriskprotection