Aortic Distensibility Measured by Automated Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Adverse Cardiovascular Events in UK Biobank

Background Automated analysis of cardiovascular magnetic resonance images provides the potential to assess aortic distensibility in large populations. The aim of this study was to compare the prediction of cardiovascular events by automated cardiovascular magnetic resonance with those of other simpl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marina Cecelja, Bram Ruijsink, Esther Puyol‐Antón, Ye Li, Harriet Godwin, Andrew P. King, Reza Razavi, Phil Chowienczyk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-12-01
Series:Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.122.026361
_version_ 1811170060118523904
author Marina Cecelja
Bram Ruijsink
Esther Puyol‐Antón
Ye Li
Harriet Godwin
Andrew P. King
Reza Razavi
Phil Chowienczyk
author_facet Marina Cecelja
Bram Ruijsink
Esther Puyol‐Antón
Ye Li
Harriet Godwin
Andrew P. King
Reza Razavi
Phil Chowienczyk
author_sort Marina Cecelja
collection DOAJ
description Background Automated analysis of cardiovascular magnetic resonance images provides the potential to assess aortic distensibility in large populations. The aim of this study was to compare the prediction of cardiovascular events by automated cardiovascular magnetic resonance with those of other simple measures of aortic stiffness suitable for population screening. Methods and Results Aortic distensibility was measured from automated segmentation of aortic cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance using artificial intelligence in 8435 participants. The associations of distensibility, brachial pulse pressure, and stiffness index (obtained by finger photoplethysmography) with conventional risk factors was examined by multivariable regression and incident cardiovascular events by Cox proportional‐hazards regression. Mean (±SD) distensibility values for men and women were 1.77±1.15 and 2.10±1.45 (P<0.0001) 10−3 mm Hg−1, respectively. There was a good correlation between automatically and manually obtained systolic and diastolic aortic areas (r=0.980 and r=0.985, respectively). In regression analysis, distensibility associated with age, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, weight, and plasma glucose but not male sex, cholesterol or current smoking. During an average follow‐up of 2.8±1.3 years, 86 participants experienced cardiovascular events 6 of whom died. Higher distensibility was associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular events (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.61 per log unit of distensibility; P=0.016). There was no evidence of an association between pulse pressure (adjusted HR 1.00; P=0.715) or stiffness index (adjusted HR, 1.02; P=0.535) and risk of cardiovascular events. Conclusions Automated cardiovascular magnetic resonance‐derived aortic distensibility may be incorporated into routine clinical imaging. It shows a similar association to cardiovascular risk factors as other measures of arterial stiffness and predicts new‐onset cardiovascular events, making it a useful tool for the measurement of vascular aging and associated cardiovascular risk.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T16:51:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-be242cfee424420ca49f4563ac2e9db7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2047-9980
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T16:51:16Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
spelling doaj.art-be242cfee424420ca49f4563ac2e9db72023-02-07T16:03:22ZengWileyJournal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease2047-99802022-12-01112310.1161/JAHA.122.026361Aortic Distensibility Measured by Automated Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Adverse Cardiovascular Events in UK BiobankMarina Cecelja0Bram Ruijsink1Esther Puyol‐Antón2Ye Li3Harriet Godwin4Andrew P. King5Reza Razavi6Phil Chowienczyk7King’s College London British Heart Foundation Centre, Department of Clinical Pharmacology St Thomas’ Hospital London United KingdomSchool of Bioengineering and Imaging Sciences King’s College London London United KingdomSchool of Bioengineering and Imaging Sciences King’s College London London United KingdomKing’s College London British Heart Foundation Centre, Department of Clinical Pharmacology St Thomas’ Hospital London United KingdomKing’s College London British Heart Foundation Centre School of Cardiovascular Medicine &amp; Sciences, Department of Cardiology London United KingdomSchool of Bioengineering and Imaging Sciences King’s College London London United KingdomSchool of Bioengineering and Imaging Sciences King’s College London London United KingdomKing’s College London British Heart Foundation Centre, Department of Clinical Pharmacology St Thomas’ Hospital London United KingdomBackground Automated analysis of cardiovascular magnetic resonance images provides the potential to assess aortic distensibility in large populations. The aim of this study was to compare the prediction of cardiovascular events by automated cardiovascular magnetic resonance with those of other simple measures of aortic stiffness suitable for population screening. Methods and Results Aortic distensibility was measured from automated segmentation of aortic cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance using artificial intelligence in 8435 participants. The associations of distensibility, brachial pulse pressure, and stiffness index (obtained by finger photoplethysmography) with conventional risk factors was examined by multivariable regression and incident cardiovascular events by Cox proportional‐hazards regression. Mean (±SD) distensibility values for men and women were 1.77±1.15 and 2.10±1.45 (P<0.0001) 10−3 mm Hg−1, respectively. There was a good correlation between automatically and manually obtained systolic and diastolic aortic areas (r=0.980 and r=0.985, respectively). In regression analysis, distensibility associated with age, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, weight, and plasma glucose but not male sex, cholesterol or current smoking. During an average follow‐up of 2.8±1.3 years, 86 participants experienced cardiovascular events 6 of whom died. Higher distensibility was associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular events (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.61 per log unit of distensibility; P=0.016). There was no evidence of an association between pulse pressure (adjusted HR 1.00; P=0.715) or stiffness index (adjusted HR, 1.02; P=0.535) and risk of cardiovascular events. Conclusions Automated cardiovascular magnetic resonance‐derived aortic distensibility may be incorporated into routine clinical imaging. It shows a similar association to cardiovascular risk factors as other measures of arterial stiffness and predicts new‐onset cardiovascular events, making it a useful tool for the measurement of vascular aging and associated cardiovascular risk.https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.122.026361aortic stiffnessdistensibilityoutcome
spellingShingle Marina Cecelja
Bram Ruijsink
Esther Puyol‐Antón
Ye Li
Harriet Godwin
Andrew P. King
Reza Razavi
Phil Chowienczyk
Aortic Distensibility Measured by Automated Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Adverse Cardiovascular Events in UK Biobank
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
aortic stiffness
distensibility
outcome
title Aortic Distensibility Measured by Automated Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Adverse Cardiovascular Events in UK Biobank
title_full Aortic Distensibility Measured by Automated Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Adverse Cardiovascular Events in UK Biobank
title_fullStr Aortic Distensibility Measured by Automated Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Adverse Cardiovascular Events in UK Biobank
title_full_unstemmed Aortic Distensibility Measured by Automated Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Adverse Cardiovascular Events in UK Biobank
title_short Aortic Distensibility Measured by Automated Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Adverse Cardiovascular Events in UK Biobank
title_sort aortic distensibility measured by automated analysis of magnetic resonance imaging predicts adverse cardiovascular events in uk biobank
topic aortic stiffness
distensibility
outcome
url https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.122.026361
work_keys_str_mv AT marinacecelja aorticdistensibilitymeasuredbyautomatedanalysisofmagneticresonanceimagingpredictsadversecardiovasculareventsinukbiobank
AT bramruijsink aorticdistensibilitymeasuredbyautomatedanalysisofmagneticresonanceimagingpredictsadversecardiovasculareventsinukbiobank
AT estherpuyolanton aorticdistensibilitymeasuredbyautomatedanalysisofmagneticresonanceimagingpredictsadversecardiovasculareventsinukbiobank
AT yeli aorticdistensibilitymeasuredbyautomatedanalysisofmagneticresonanceimagingpredictsadversecardiovasculareventsinukbiobank
AT harrietgodwin aorticdistensibilitymeasuredbyautomatedanalysisofmagneticresonanceimagingpredictsadversecardiovasculareventsinukbiobank
AT andrewpking aorticdistensibilitymeasuredbyautomatedanalysisofmagneticresonanceimagingpredictsadversecardiovasculareventsinukbiobank
AT rezarazavi aorticdistensibilitymeasuredbyautomatedanalysisofmagneticresonanceimagingpredictsadversecardiovasculareventsinukbiobank
AT philchowienczyk aorticdistensibilitymeasuredbyautomatedanalysisofmagneticresonanceimagingpredictsadversecardiovasculareventsinukbiobank