Quantification of blood loss for the diagnosis of postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis
ABSTRACT Objective: to compare the effectiveness of different diagnostic methods to estimate postpartum blood volume loss. Methods: a systematic review of effectiveness according to PRISMA and JBI Protocol. Searches in PubMed/MEDLINE, LILACS, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science and CINAHL, with descrip...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem
2023-12-01
|
Series: | Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://revodonto.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672023001000605&lng=en&tlng=en |
_version_ | 1797404467187941376 |
---|---|
author | Mariana Torreglosa Ruiz Nayara Freitas Azevedo Cynthya Viana de Resende Wellington Francisco Rodrigues Joilson Meneguci Divanice Contim Monika Wernet Carlo José Freire de Oliveira |
author_facet | Mariana Torreglosa Ruiz Nayara Freitas Azevedo Cynthya Viana de Resende Wellington Francisco Rodrigues Joilson Meneguci Divanice Contim Monika Wernet Carlo José Freire de Oliveira |
author_sort | Mariana Torreglosa Ruiz |
collection | DOAJ |
description | ABSTRACT Objective: to compare the effectiveness of different diagnostic methods to estimate postpartum blood volume loss. Methods: a systematic review of effectiveness according to PRISMA and JBI Protocol. Searches in PubMed/MEDLINE, LILACS, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science and CINAHL, with descriptor “Postpartum Hemorrhage” associated with keyword “Quantification of Blood Loss”. Tabulated extracted data, presented in metasynthesis and meta-analysis was applied to quantitative data. To assess risk of bias, JBI Appraisal Tools were applied. Results: fourteen studies were included, published between 2006 and 2021. Quantification of loss by any method was superior to visual estimation and is highly recommended, however the studies’ high heterogeneity did not allow estimating this association. Conclusion: the studies’ high heterogeneity, with a probable margin of error given the uncontrolled factors, indicates the need for further studies, however quantification proved to be effective in relation to visual estimate. PROSPERO registration CRD 42021234486. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-09T02:55:24Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-be25381731084a15b7b7d3f1441382f6 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1984-0446 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-09T02:55:24Z |
publishDate | 2023-12-01 |
publisher | Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem |
record_format | Article |
series | Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem |
spelling | doaj.art-be25381731084a15b7b7d3f1441382f62023-12-05T07:37:30ZengAssociação Brasileira de EnfermagemRevista Brasileira de Enfermagem1984-04462023-12-0176610.1590/0034-7167-2023-0070Quantification of blood loss for the diagnosis of postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysisMariana Torreglosa Ruizhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5199-7328Nayara Freitas Azevedohttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7748-4777Cynthya Viana de Resendehttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1203-2504Wellington Francisco Rodrigueshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3426-2186Joilson Menegucihttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2268-3589Divanice Contimhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5213-1465Monika Wernethttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1194-3261Carlo José Freire de Oliveirahttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2211-7333ABSTRACT Objective: to compare the effectiveness of different diagnostic methods to estimate postpartum blood volume loss. Methods: a systematic review of effectiveness according to PRISMA and JBI Protocol. Searches in PubMed/MEDLINE, LILACS, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science and CINAHL, with descriptor “Postpartum Hemorrhage” associated with keyword “Quantification of Blood Loss”. Tabulated extracted data, presented in metasynthesis and meta-analysis was applied to quantitative data. To assess risk of bias, JBI Appraisal Tools were applied. Results: fourteen studies were included, published between 2006 and 2021. Quantification of loss by any method was superior to visual estimation and is highly recommended, however the studies’ high heterogeneity did not allow estimating this association. Conclusion: the studies’ high heterogeneity, with a probable margin of error given the uncontrolled factors, indicates the need for further studies, however quantification proved to be effective in relation to visual estimate. PROSPERO registration CRD 42021234486.http://revodonto.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672023001000605&lng=en&tlng=enQuantification of Blood LossPostpartum HemorrhagePostpartum PeriodReviewMeta-Analysis |
spellingShingle | Mariana Torreglosa Ruiz Nayara Freitas Azevedo Cynthya Viana de Resende Wellington Francisco Rodrigues Joilson Meneguci Divanice Contim Monika Wernet Carlo José Freire de Oliveira Quantification of blood loss for the diagnosis of postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem Quantification of Blood Loss Postpartum Hemorrhage Postpartum Period Review Meta-Analysis |
title | Quantification of blood loss for the diagnosis of postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Quantification of blood loss for the diagnosis of postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Quantification of blood loss for the diagnosis of postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantification of blood loss for the diagnosis of postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Quantification of blood loss for the diagnosis of postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | quantification of blood loss for the diagnosis of postpartum hemorrhage a systematic review and meta analysis |
topic | Quantification of Blood Loss Postpartum Hemorrhage Postpartum Period Review Meta-Analysis |
url | http://revodonto.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672023001000605&lng=en&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marianatorreglosaruiz quantificationofbloodlossforthediagnosisofpostpartumhemorrhageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT nayarafreitasazevedo quantificationofbloodlossforthediagnosisofpostpartumhemorrhageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT cynthyavianaderesende quantificationofbloodlossforthediagnosisofpostpartumhemorrhageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wellingtonfranciscorodrigues quantificationofbloodlossforthediagnosisofpostpartumhemorrhageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT joilsonmeneguci quantificationofbloodlossforthediagnosisofpostpartumhemorrhageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT divanicecontim quantificationofbloodlossforthediagnosisofpostpartumhemorrhageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT monikawernet quantificationofbloodlossforthediagnosisofpostpartumhemorrhageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT carlojosefreiredeoliveira quantificationofbloodlossforthediagnosisofpostpartumhemorrhageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |