Quantification of blood loss for the diagnosis of postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis

ABSTRACT Objective: to compare the effectiveness of different diagnostic methods to estimate postpartum blood volume loss. Methods: a systematic review of effectiveness according to PRISMA and JBI Protocol. Searches in PubMed/MEDLINE, LILACS, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science and CINAHL, with descrip...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mariana Torreglosa Ruiz, Nayara Freitas Azevedo, Cynthya Viana de Resende, Wellington Francisco Rodrigues, Joilson Meneguci, Divanice Contim, Monika Wernet, Carlo José Freire de Oliveira
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem 2023-12-01
Series:Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
Subjects:
Online Access:http://revodonto.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672023001000605&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1797404467187941376
author Mariana Torreglosa Ruiz
Nayara Freitas Azevedo
Cynthya Viana de Resende
Wellington Francisco Rodrigues
Joilson Meneguci
Divanice Contim
Monika Wernet
Carlo José Freire de Oliveira
author_facet Mariana Torreglosa Ruiz
Nayara Freitas Azevedo
Cynthya Viana de Resende
Wellington Francisco Rodrigues
Joilson Meneguci
Divanice Contim
Monika Wernet
Carlo José Freire de Oliveira
author_sort Mariana Torreglosa Ruiz
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Objective: to compare the effectiveness of different diagnostic methods to estimate postpartum blood volume loss. Methods: a systematic review of effectiveness according to PRISMA and JBI Protocol. Searches in PubMed/MEDLINE, LILACS, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science and CINAHL, with descriptor “Postpartum Hemorrhage” associated with keyword “Quantification of Blood Loss”. Tabulated extracted data, presented in metasynthesis and meta-analysis was applied to quantitative data. To assess risk of bias, JBI Appraisal Tools were applied. Results: fourteen studies were included, published between 2006 and 2021. Quantification of loss by any method was superior to visual estimation and is highly recommended, however the studies’ high heterogeneity did not allow estimating this association. Conclusion: the studies’ high heterogeneity, with a probable margin of error given the uncontrolled factors, indicates the need for further studies, however quantification proved to be effective in relation to visual estimate. PROSPERO registration CRD 42021234486.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T02:55:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-be25381731084a15b7b7d3f1441382f6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1984-0446
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T02:55:24Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem
record_format Article
series Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
spelling doaj.art-be25381731084a15b7b7d3f1441382f62023-12-05T07:37:30ZengAssociação Brasileira de EnfermagemRevista Brasileira de Enfermagem1984-04462023-12-0176610.1590/0034-7167-2023-0070Quantification of blood loss for the diagnosis of postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysisMariana Torreglosa Ruizhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5199-7328Nayara Freitas Azevedohttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7748-4777Cynthya Viana de Resendehttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1203-2504Wellington Francisco Rodrigueshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3426-2186Joilson Menegucihttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2268-3589Divanice Contimhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5213-1465Monika Wernethttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1194-3261Carlo José Freire de Oliveirahttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2211-7333ABSTRACT Objective: to compare the effectiveness of different diagnostic methods to estimate postpartum blood volume loss. Methods: a systematic review of effectiveness according to PRISMA and JBI Protocol. Searches in PubMed/MEDLINE, LILACS, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science and CINAHL, with descriptor “Postpartum Hemorrhage” associated with keyword “Quantification of Blood Loss”. Tabulated extracted data, presented in metasynthesis and meta-analysis was applied to quantitative data. To assess risk of bias, JBI Appraisal Tools were applied. Results: fourteen studies were included, published between 2006 and 2021. Quantification of loss by any method was superior to visual estimation and is highly recommended, however the studies’ high heterogeneity did not allow estimating this association. Conclusion: the studies’ high heterogeneity, with a probable margin of error given the uncontrolled factors, indicates the need for further studies, however quantification proved to be effective in relation to visual estimate. PROSPERO registration CRD 42021234486.http://revodonto.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672023001000605&lng=en&tlng=enQuantification of Blood LossPostpartum HemorrhagePostpartum PeriodReviewMeta-Analysis
spellingShingle Mariana Torreglosa Ruiz
Nayara Freitas Azevedo
Cynthya Viana de Resende
Wellington Francisco Rodrigues
Joilson Meneguci
Divanice Contim
Monika Wernet
Carlo José Freire de Oliveira
Quantification of blood loss for the diagnosis of postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
Quantification of Blood Loss
Postpartum Hemorrhage
Postpartum Period
Review
Meta-Analysis
title Quantification of blood loss for the diagnosis of postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Quantification of blood loss for the diagnosis of postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Quantification of blood loss for the diagnosis of postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Quantification of blood loss for the diagnosis of postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Quantification of blood loss for the diagnosis of postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort quantification of blood loss for the diagnosis of postpartum hemorrhage a systematic review and meta analysis
topic Quantification of Blood Loss
Postpartum Hemorrhage
Postpartum Period
Review
Meta-Analysis
url http://revodonto.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672023001000605&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT marianatorreglosaruiz quantificationofbloodlossforthediagnosisofpostpartumhemorrhageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nayarafreitasazevedo quantificationofbloodlossforthediagnosisofpostpartumhemorrhageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cynthyavianaderesende quantificationofbloodlossforthediagnosisofpostpartumhemorrhageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wellingtonfranciscorodrigues quantificationofbloodlossforthediagnosisofpostpartumhemorrhageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT joilsonmeneguci quantificationofbloodlossforthediagnosisofpostpartumhemorrhageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT divanicecontim quantificationofbloodlossforthediagnosisofpostpartumhemorrhageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT monikawernet quantificationofbloodlossforthediagnosisofpostpartumhemorrhageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT carlojosefreiredeoliveira quantificationofbloodlossforthediagnosisofpostpartumhemorrhageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis