Comparative analysis of current 3D printed acetabular titanium implants
Abstract Background The design freedom allowed by three-dimensional (3D) printing enables the production of acetabular off-the-shelf cups with complex porous structures. The only studies on these designs are limited to clinical outcomes. Our aim was to analyse and compare the designs of different 3D...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2019-11-01
|
| Series: | 3D Printing in Medicine |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41205-019-0052-0 |
| _version_ | 1818211984265445376 |
|---|---|
| author | Lorenzo Dall’Ava Harry Hothi Johann Henckel Anna Di Laura Paul Shearing Alister Hart |
| author_facet | Lorenzo Dall’Ava Harry Hothi Johann Henckel Anna Di Laura Paul Shearing Alister Hart |
| author_sort | Lorenzo Dall’Ava |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background The design freedom allowed by three-dimensional (3D) printing enables the production of acetabular off-the-shelf cups with complex porous structures. The only studies on these designs are limited to clinical outcomes. Our aim was to analyse and compare the designs of different 3D printed cups from multiple manufacturers (Delta TT, Trident II Tritanium and Mpact 3D Metal). Methods We analysed the outer surface of the cups using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and assessed clinically relevant morphometric features of the lattice structures using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). Dimensions related to the cup wall (solid, lattice and overall thickness) were also measured. Roundness and roughness of the internal cup surface were analysed with coordinate measuring machine (CMM) and optical profilometry. Results SEM showed partially molten titanium beads on all cups, significantly smaller on Trident II (27 μm vs ~ 70 μm, p < 0.0001). We found a spread of pore sizes, with median values of 0.521, 0.841 and 1.004 mm for Trident II, Delta TT and Mpact, respectively. Trident II was also significantly less porous (63%, p < 0.0001) than the others (Delta TT 72.3%, Mpact 76.4%), and showed the thinnest lattice region of the cup wall (1.038 mm, p < 0.0001), while Mpact exhibited the thicker solid region (4.880 mm, p < 0.0044). Similar roundness and roughness of the internal cup surfaces were found. Conclusion This was the first study to compare the designs of different 3D printed cups. A variability in the morphology of the outer surface of the cups and lattice structures was found. The existence of titanium beads on 3D printed parts is a known by-product of the manufacturing process; however, their prevalence on acetabular cups used in patients is an interesting finding, since these beads may potentially be released in the body. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-12T05:41:11Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-be2953a6c22247a3ab36c2decb106a15 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2365-6271 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-12T05:41:11Z |
| publishDate | 2019-11-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | 3D Printing in Medicine |
| spelling | doaj.art-be2953a6c22247a3ab36c2decb106a152022-12-22T00:35:55ZengBMC3D Printing in Medicine2365-62712019-11-015111010.1186/s41205-019-0052-0Comparative analysis of current 3D printed acetabular titanium implantsLorenzo Dall’Ava0Harry Hothi1Johann Henckel2Anna Di Laura3Paul Shearing4Alister Hart5Institute of Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Science, University College LondonRoyal National Orthopaedic HospitalRoyal National Orthopaedic HospitalRoyal National Orthopaedic HospitalElectrochemical Innovation Lab, Department of Chemical Engineering, University College LondonRoyal National Orthopaedic HospitalAbstract Background The design freedom allowed by three-dimensional (3D) printing enables the production of acetabular off-the-shelf cups with complex porous structures. The only studies on these designs are limited to clinical outcomes. Our aim was to analyse and compare the designs of different 3D printed cups from multiple manufacturers (Delta TT, Trident II Tritanium and Mpact 3D Metal). Methods We analysed the outer surface of the cups using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and assessed clinically relevant morphometric features of the lattice structures using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). Dimensions related to the cup wall (solid, lattice and overall thickness) were also measured. Roundness and roughness of the internal cup surface were analysed with coordinate measuring machine (CMM) and optical profilometry. Results SEM showed partially molten titanium beads on all cups, significantly smaller on Trident II (27 μm vs ~ 70 μm, p < 0.0001). We found a spread of pore sizes, with median values of 0.521, 0.841 and 1.004 mm for Trident II, Delta TT and Mpact, respectively. Trident II was also significantly less porous (63%, p < 0.0001) than the others (Delta TT 72.3%, Mpact 76.4%), and showed the thinnest lattice region of the cup wall (1.038 mm, p < 0.0001), while Mpact exhibited the thicker solid region (4.880 mm, p < 0.0044). Similar roundness and roughness of the internal cup surfaces were found. Conclusion This was the first study to compare the designs of different 3D printed cups. A variability in the morphology of the outer surface of the cups and lattice structures was found. The existence of titanium beads on 3D printed parts is a known by-product of the manufacturing process; however, their prevalence on acetabular cups used in patients is an interesting finding, since these beads may potentially be released in the body.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41205-019-0052-03D printingAdditive manufacturingOrthopaedic implantAcetabular cupHip Arthroplasty |
| spellingShingle | Lorenzo Dall’Ava Harry Hothi Johann Henckel Anna Di Laura Paul Shearing Alister Hart Comparative analysis of current 3D printed acetabular titanium implants 3D Printing in Medicine 3D printing Additive manufacturing Orthopaedic implant Acetabular cup Hip Arthroplasty |
| title | Comparative analysis of current 3D printed acetabular titanium implants |
| title_full | Comparative analysis of current 3D printed acetabular titanium implants |
| title_fullStr | Comparative analysis of current 3D printed acetabular titanium implants |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis of current 3D printed acetabular titanium implants |
| title_short | Comparative analysis of current 3D printed acetabular titanium implants |
| title_sort | comparative analysis of current 3d printed acetabular titanium implants |
| topic | 3D printing Additive manufacturing Orthopaedic implant Acetabular cup Hip Arthroplasty |
| url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41205-019-0052-0 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lorenzodallava comparativeanalysisofcurrent3dprintedacetabulartitaniumimplants AT harryhothi comparativeanalysisofcurrent3dprintedacetabulartitaniumimplants AT johannhenckel comparativeanalysisofcurrent3dprintedacetabulartitaniumimplants AT annadilaura comparativeanalysisofcurrent3dprintedacetabulartitaniumimplants AT paulshearing comparativeanalysisofcurrent3dprintedacetabulartitaniumimplants AT alisterhart comparativeanalysisofcurrent3dprintedacetabulartitaniumimplants |