Use of Impella device in cardiogenic shock and its clinical outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Use of Impella device in cardiogenic shock and its clinical outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a life-threatening condition and mechanical circulatory support (MCS) might exert a relevant impact on its clinical course. Among MCS devices, Impella is very promising. Yet, its usefulness is still debated. We performed a meta-analysis of all studies evaluati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Giuseppe Panuccio, Giuseppe Neri, Lucrezia Maria Macrì, Nadia Salerno, Salvatore De Rosa, Daniele Torella
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Elsevier 2022-06-01
Series:	International Journal of Cardiology: Heart & Vasculature
Subjects:	Cardiogenic shock Impella Hemodynamic support Mechanical circulatory support IABP
Online Access:	http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906722000562

Similar Items

Cardiogenic shock — the current state of the problem
by: S. A. Boytsov, et al.
Published: (2019-11-01)

Ventricular Unloading Using the ImpellaTM Device in Cardiogenic Shock
by: Adrian Attinger-Toller, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01)

Impella malrotation affects left ventricle unloading in cardiogenic shock patients
by: Luca Baldetti, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01)

Cardiogenic shock - novelty and emerging therapeutic concepts
by: I. Petrov, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01)

Combined mechanical circulatory support (Impella + ECMO) in cardiogenic shock caused by fulminant myocarditis
by: Michaela Zemkova, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01)

IABP versus Impella Support in Cardiogenic Shock: “In Silico” Study
by: Beatrice De Lazzari, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01)

Prolonged Impella 5.0/5.5 support within different pathways of care for cardiogenic shock: the experience of a referral center
by: Marina Pieri, et al.
Published: (2024-07-01)

Trends in Veno‐Arterial Extracorporeal Life Support With and Without an Impella or Intra‐Aortic Balloon Pump for Cardiogenic Shock
by: Michael J. Hendrickson, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01)

Computational Evaluation of IABP, Impella 2.5, TandemHeart and Combined IABP and Impella 2.5 Support in Cardiogenic Shock
by: Rahmi Alkan, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01)

Beneficial Effects of IABP in Anterior Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
by: Alberto Somaschini, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01)

Cardiogenic shock with highly complicated course after influenza A virus infection treated with vva-ECMO and Impella CP (ECMELLA): a case report
by: Daniel Ebert, et al.
Published: (2021-11-01)

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and microaxial left ventricular assist device in cardiogenic shock: Choosing the right mechanical circulatory support to improve outcomesCentral MessagePerspective
by: Olina Dagher, MD, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01)

Hemodynamics with mechanical circulatory support devices using a cardiogenic shock model
by: Kazuyuki Yahagi, et al.
Published: (2024-06-01)

The intelligent Impella: Future perspectives of artificial intelligence in the setting of Impella support
by: Filippo Consolo, et al.
Published: (2024-10-01)

Survey on Cardiogenic Shock and the Use of ECMO and Impella in Spanish Cardiac Critical Care Units
by: Manuel Martínez-Sellés, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01)

Case report: Combination of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and intra-aortic balloon pump in a young male patient with refractory cardiogenic shock due to aluminum phosphide poisoning
by: Oleg Dukhin, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01)

Cardiac shock care center — the next stage in the treatment of cardiogenic shock
by: S. A. Boytsov, et al.
Published: (2019-11-01)

Can a mechanical circulatory support comprehensive approach to cardiogenic shock at referral centers reduce 30-day mortality?
by: Marina Pieri, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01)

Trends and outcomes of different mechanical circulatory support modalities for acute myocardial infarction associated cardiogenic shock in patients undergoing early revascularization
by: Shafaqat Ali, et al.
Published: (2024-10-01)

A case series analysis on the clinical experience of Impella 5.5® at a large tertiary care centre
by: Peter J. Kennel, et al.
Published: (2021-10-01)

Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock Patients after Cardiac Procedures: Selection Algorithm and Weaning Strategies
by: Gaik Nersesian, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01)

Complications and Outcomes of Impella Treatment in Cardiogenic Shock Patients With and Without Acute Myocardial Infarction
by: Yuichi Saito, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01)

Durable left ventricular assist devices following temporary circulatory support on a microaxial flow pump with and without extracorporeal life supportCentral MessagePerspective
by: Daniel Lewin, et al.
Published: (2024-10-01)

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia under Mechanical Circulatory Support by Large Impella for Acute Cardiogenic Shock
by: Yukiharu Sugimura, et al.
Published: (2021-11-01)

Impella Versus Intra‐Aortic Balloon Pump in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Treated With Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: An Observational Study
by: Ilhwan Yeo, et al.
Published: (2024-02-01)

Novel method for transaxillary Impella 5.0 implantation in patients with tortuous arterial anatomy
by: Bryant Fisher, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01)

Single center experience and early outcomes of Impella 5.5
by: Masaki Funamoto, et al.
Published: (2023-02-01)

Clinical outcomes and predictors of success with Impella weaning in cardiogenic shock: a single-center experience
by: M. V. Matassini, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01)

Early Utilization of Mechanical Circulatory Support in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: The National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative
by: Mir B. Basir, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01)

Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Mechanical Circulatory Device Utilization and Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock
by: Andrew Adelsheimer, MD, MBA, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01)

Impella 5.5 as a bridge-to-surgery in acute ischemic mitral regurgitation post-percutaneous coronary intervention: a case report
by: Ioana Dumitru, et al.
Published: (2024-11-01)

State of Shock: Contemporary Vasopressor and Inotrope Use in Cardiogenic Shock
by: Jason E. Bloom, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01)

Central Venous Pressure and Clinical Outcomes During Left-Sided Mechanical Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock
by: Evan H. Whitehead, et al.
Published: (2020-08-01)

Effect of Impella 5.5 on Preexisting Functional Mitral Regurgitation in Patients with Heart Failure–Related Cardiogenic Shock
by: Rachna Kataria, MD, et al.
Published: (2022-08-01)

Cardiogenic Shock: Searching for a Better Lifeboat
by: David A. Baran, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01)

Outcome differences in acute vs. acute on chronic heart failure and cardiogenic shock
by: Tara L. Jones, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01)

Mechanical Circulatory Support for Myocarditis Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
by: Agnė Jankuvienė, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01)

Impella Versus VA-ECMO for Patients with Cardiogenic Shock: Comprehensive Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analyses
by: Vittoria Ardito, et al.
Published: (2023-04-01)

Safe Placement of Temporary Left Ventricular Assist Device Using Monitored Anesthesia Care and Regional Anesthesia in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock
by: John DePaolo, MD, PhD, et al.
Published: (2023-11-01)

Mechanical Circulatory Support in Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: Impact of Sex and Timing
by: Tayyab Shah, MD, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)