Let’s Call It What It Is: Hybrid Threats and Instrumentalisation as the Evolution of Securitisation in Migration Management
(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2023 8(2), 561-578 | European Forum Insight of 27 september 2023 | (Table of Contents) I. Introduction. - II. Pushbacks and their human rights implications. - III. Instrumentalisation as justification for pushbacks in national...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
European Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu)
2023-09-01
|
| Series: | European Papers |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/europeanforum/lets-call-it-what-it-is-hybrid-threats-and-instrumentalisation |
| _version_ | 1827590231995449344 |
|---|---|
| author | Mariana Gkliati |
| author_facet | Mariana Gkliati |
| author_sort | Mariana Gkliati |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | (Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2023 8(2), 561-578 | European Forum Insight of 27 september 2023 | (Table of Contents) I. Introduction. - II. Pushbacks and their human rights implications. - III. Instrumentalisation as justification for pushbacks in national rhetoric and law. - IV. Instrumentalisation arguments infiltrating the EU. - V. EU regulatory responses to “hybrid threats”. - VI. The worst of a series of bad legislative proposals. - VII. Fundamentally different situation on the ground? - VIII. Conclusion and discussion. | (Abstract) This Insight examines the discourse surrounding the instrumentalisation of migration and its impact on monitoring the EU’s external borders. It analyses the regulatory response, focusing on the Instrumentalisation Regulation, to determine if an exceptional emergency response is justified. The article explores recent arguments regarding changes in factual circumstances, such as pushbacks and their human rights implications. It also investigates the invocation of hybrid threats and instrumentalisation of migrants in national legal contexts (Greece, Spain, Poland, Lithuania and Latvia) to justify systematic pushback practices. The Insight discusses EU institutions’ adoption of these arguments and their inclusion in legislative proposals. The article critically examines the regulatory proposals from a fundamental rights perspective, questioning the extent to which the existing protection framework can be derogated. The Insight assesses whether a fundamental shift has occurred and if it warrants an exceptional response to safeguard the Area of Freedom Security and Justice, Schengen, and the Common European Asylum System. It offers an “insight” contributing to the ongoing scholarly conversation by providing a timely analysis of the legal implications of the instrumentalisation of migration, considering it as a continuation of the securitisation paradigm rather than a paradigm shift requiring an exceptional emergency response, as exemplified by the proposed Instrumentalisation Regulation. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-09T01:13:59Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-be5d3ad841814331ac9c913db8d63728 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2499-8249 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-09T01:13:59Z |
| publishDate | 2023-09-01 |
| publisher | European Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | European Papers |
| spelling | doaj.art-be5d3ad841814331ac9c913db8d637282023-12-10T13:17:39ZengEuropean Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu)European Papers2499-82492023-09-012023 8256157810.15166/2499-8249/675Let’s Call It What It Is: Hybrid Threats and Instrumentalisation as the Evolution of Securitisation in Migration ManagementMariana Gkliati0Tilburg University(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2023 8(2), 561-578 | European Forum Insight of 27 september 2023 | (Table of Contents) I. Introduction. - II. Pushbacks and their human rights implications. - III. Instrumentalisation as justification for pushbacks in national rhetoric and law. - IV. Instrumentalisation arguments infiltrating the EU. - V. EU regulatory responses to “hybrid threats”. - VI. The worst of a series of bad legislative proposals. - VII. Fundamentally different situation on the ground? - VIII. Conclusion and discussion. | (Abstract) This Insight examines the discourse surrounding the instrumentalisation of migration and its impact on monitoring the EU’s external borders. It analyses the regulatory response, focusing on the Instrumentalisation Regulation, to determine if an exceptional emergency response is justified. The article explores recent arguments regarding changes in factual circumstances, such as pushbacks and their human rights implications. It also investigates the invocation of hybrid threats and instrumentalisation of migrants in national legal contexts (Greece, Spain, Poland, Lithuania and Latvia) to justify systematic pushback practices. The Insight discusses EU institutions’ adoption of these arguments and their inclusion in legislative proposals. The article critically examines the regulatory proposals from a fundamental rights perspective, questioning the extent to which the existing protection framework can be derogated. The Insight assesses whether a fundamental shift has occurred and if it warrants an exceptional response to safeguard the Area of Freedom Security and Justice, Schengen, and the Common European Asylum System. It offers an “insight” contributing to the ongoing scholarly conversation by providing a timely analysis of the legal implications of the instrumentalisation of migration, considering it as a continuation of the securitisation paradigm rather than a paradigm shift requiring an exceptional emergency response, as exemplified by the proposed Instrumentalisation Regulation.https://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/europeanforum/lets-call-it-what-it-is-hybrid-threats-and-instrumentalisationinstrumentalisationhybrid threatsexternal bordersfundamental rightspushbackssecuritisation |
| spellingShingle | Mariana Gkliati Let’s Call It What It Is: Hybrid Threats and Instrumentalisation as the Evolution of Securitisation in Migration Management European Papers instrumentalisation hybrid threats external borders fundamental rights pushbacks securitisation |
| title | Let’s Call It What It Is: Hybrid Threats and Instrumentalisation as the Evolution of Securitisation in Migration Management |
| title_full | Let’s Call It What It Is: Hybrid Threats and Instrumentalisation as the Evolution of Securitisation in Migration Management |
| title_fullStr | Let’s Call It What It Is: Hybrid Threats and Instrumentalisation as the Evolution of Securitisation in Migration Management |
| title_full_unstemmed | Let’s Call It What It Is: Hybrid Threats and Instrumentalisation as the Evolution of Securitisation in Migration Management |
| title_short | Let’s Call It What It Is: Hybrid Threats and Instrumentalisation as the Evolution of Securitisation in Migration Management |
| title_sort | let s call it what it is hybrid threats and instrumentalisation as the evolution of securitisation in migration management |
| topic | instrumentalisation hybrid threats external borders fundamental rights pushbacks securitisation |
| url | https://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/europeanforum/lets-call-it-what-it-is-hybrid-threats-and-instrumentalisation |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT marianagkliati letscallitwhatitishybridthreatsandinstrumentalisationastheevolutionofsecuritisationinmigrationmanagement |