Cervical and thoracolumbar radiological sagittal parameters in asymptomatic Indian population

Introduction: There is a dearth of normative data for radiological sagittal parameters of asymptomatic Indians. The present study aimed to address this lacuna. Materials and Methods: Sagittal radiological parameters were studied in asymptomatic volunteers: seven lumbopelvic, i.e., pelvic index (PI),...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yogesh Kishorkant Pithwa, Sanjeev Sankar Chandran, Vishnu Vardhan Rudravaram
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021-01-01
Series:Indian Spine Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.isjonline.com/article.asp?issn=2589-5079;year=2021;volume=4;issue=2;spage=188;epage=197;aulast=Pithwa
_version_ 1829522111602884608
author Yogesh Kishorkant Pithwa
Sanjeev Sankar Chandran
Vishnu Vardhan Rudravaram
author_facet Yogesh Kishorkant Pithwa
Sanjeev Sankar Chandran
Vishnu Vardhan Rudravaram
author_sort Yogesh Kishorkant Pithwa
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: There is a dearth of normative data for radiological sagittal parameters of asymptomatic Indians. The present study aimed to address this lacuna. Materials and Methods: Sagittal radiological parameters were studied in asymptomatic volunteers: seven lumbopelvic, i.e., pelvic index (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), cranial LL (crLL), caudal LL (caLL), PI-LL; three thoracic and thoracolumbar, i.e., thoracolumbar alignment (TL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), T1 slope (TS0); five cervical, i.e., cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), cervical lordosis (CL), TS-CL, C2 slope (CS), C2 T1 pelvic angle (CTPA); and lastly, five global parameters: SVA, T9 spinopelvic inclination (T9SPI), T1 spinopelvic inclination (T1SPI), T1 pelvic angle (TPA), C2 pelvic angle (CPA) were studied. Results: Volunteers (n = 125) aged 41.49±12.93 years were included. Mean PI, PT, SS, LL, crLL, caLL, PI-LL, TL, TK, TS, cSVA, CL, TS-CL, CS, CTPA, SVA, T9SPI, T1SPI, TPA, and CPA were 47.23±8.04°, 13.4±6.61°, 33.68±4.59°, −56.19±7.83°, −22.71±9.82°, −45.02±10.07°, −7.83±9.4°, 9.99±11.17°, 22±7.33°, 4.88±7.64°, 34.77±12.2 mm, −6.36±10.99°, −0.5±10.02°, 2.56±9.53°, 3.54±1.04°, −36.49±23.4 mm, −10.89±2.75°, −7.88±2.17°, 5.52±6.82°, and 10.72±6.69°, respectively. As per Roussouly’s classification, the distribution for types I, II, III, and IV was 32 (25.6%), 41 (32.8%), 45 (36%), and 7 (5.6%), respectively. LL correlated significantly with PI, SS, and TK. TS had significant correlation with CL and TS-CL. cSVA significantly correlated with CL. PI-LL significantly correlated with TS-CL. CS significantly correlated with cSVA and TS-CL. TS-CL significantly correlated with cSVA. TPA correlated significantly with PT, SVA, PI, and PI-LL. CTPA correlated significantly with CL, cSVA, TK, and TS-CL. Males had significantly different SVA (−35.3 mm), TK (22.4°), TS (6.2°), TPA (6.35°), cSVA (37.1 mm), and CTPA (3.95°) when compared with females (−58.4 mm, 17.2°, −0.15°, 0.3°, 24.95 mm, and 2.85°, respectively) (P = 0.008, 0.003, 0.002, 0.003, 0.002, and 0.0005, respectively). Conclusion: Normative data for sagittal profile in Indian volunteers, enunciated in this study, can be used to guide decisions in surgery.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T15:27:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-be6eea01e95440a59832ce5c7530025e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2589-5079
2589-5087
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T15:27:37Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Spine Journal
spelling doaj.art-be6eea01e95440a59832ce5c7530025e2022-12-21T22:26:28ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Spine Journal2589-50792589-50872021-01-014218819710.4103/ISJ.ISJ_92_20Cervical and thoracolumbar radiological sagittal parameters in asymptomatic Indian populationYogesh Kishorkant PithwaSanjeev Sankar ChandranVishnu Vardhan RudravaramIntroduction: There is a dearth of normative data for radiological sagittal parameters of asymptomatic Indians. The present study aimed to address this lacuna. Materials and Methods: Sagittal radiological parameters were studied in asymptomatic volunteers: seven lumbopelvic, i.e., pelvic index (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), cranial LL (crLL), caudal LL (caLL), PI-LL; three thoracic and thoracolumbar, i.e., thoracolumbar alignment (TL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), T1 slope (TS0); five cervical, i.e., cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), cervical lordosis (CL), TS-CL, C2 slope (CS), C2 T1 pelvic angle (CTPA); and lastly, five global parameters: SVA, T9 spinopelvic inclination (T9SPI), T1 spinopelvic inclination (T1SPI), T1 pelvic angle (TPA), C2 pelvic angle (CPA) were studied. Results: Volunteers (n = 125) aged 41.49±12.93 years were included. Mean PI, PT, SS, LL, crLL, caLL, PI-LL, TL, TK, TS, cSVA, CL, TS-CL, CS, CTPA, SVA, T9SPI, T1SPI, TPA, and CPA were 47.23±8.04°, 13.4±6.61°, 33.68±4.59°, −56.19±7.83°, −22.71±9.82°, −45.02±10.07°, −7.83±9.4°, 9.99±11.17°, 22±7.33°, 4.88±7.64°, 34.77±12.2 mm, −6.36±10.99°, −0.5±10.02°, 2.56±9.53°, 3.54±1.04°, −36.49±23.4 mm, −10.89±2.75°, −7.88±2.17°, 5.52±6.82°, and 10.72±6.69°, respectively. As per Roussouly’s classification, the distribution for types I, II, III, and IV was 32 (25.6%), 41 (32.8%), 45 (36%), and 7 (5.6%), respectively. LL correlated significantly with PI, SS, and TK. TS had significant correlation with CL and TS-CL. cSVA significantly correlated with CL. PI-LL significantly correlated with TS-CL. CS significantly correlated with cSVA and TS-CL. TS-CL significantly correlated with cSVA. TPA correlated significantly with PT, SVA, PI, and PI-LL. CTPA correlated significantly with CL, cSVA, TK, and TS-CL. Males had significantly different SVA (−35.3 mm), TK (22.4°), TS (6.2°), TPA (6.35°), cSVA (37.1 mm), and CTPA (3.95°) when compared with females (−58.4 mm, 17.2°, −0.15°, 0.3°, 24.95 mm, and 2.85°, respectively) (P = 0.008, 0.003, 0.002, 0.003, 0.002, and 0.0005, respectively). Conclusion: Normative data for sagittal profile in Indian volunteers, enunciated in this study, can be used to guide decisions in surgery.http://www.isjonline.com/article.asp?issn=2589-5079;year=2021;volume=4;issue=2;spage=188;epage=197;aulast=Pithwaasymptomaticcervicalindianlumbarsagittalsagittal radiologicalsagittal radiological parametersspinethoracolumbar
spellingShingle Yogesh Kishorkant Pithwa
Sanjeev Sankar Chandran
Vishnu Vardhan Rudravaram
Cervical and thoracolumbar radiological sagittal parameters in asymptomatic Indian population
Indian Spine Journal
asymptomatic
cervical
indian
lumbar
sagittal
sagittal radiological
sagittal radiological parameters
spine
thoracolumbar
title Cervical and thoracolumbar radiological sagittal parameters in asymptomatic Indian population
title_full Cervical and thoracolumbar radiological sagittal parameters in asymptomatic Indian population
title_fullStr Cervical and thoracolumbar radiological sagittal parameters in asymptomatic Indian population
title_full_unstemmed Cervical and thoracolumbar radiological sagittal parameters in asymptomatic Indian population
title_short Cervical and thoracolumbar radiological sagittal parameters in asymptomatic Indian population
title_sort cervical and thoracolumbar radiological sagittal parameters in asymptomatic indian population
topic asymptomatic
cervical
indian
lumbar
sagittal
sagittal radiological
sagittal radiological parameters
spine
thoracolumbar
url http://www.isjonline.com/article.asp?issn=2589-5079;year=2021;volume=4;issue=2;spage=188;epage=197;aulast=Pithwa
work_keys_str_mv AT yogeshkishorkantpithwa cervicalandthoracolumbarradiologicalsagittalparametersinasymptomaticindianpopulation
AT sanjeevsankarchandran cervicalandthoracolumbarradiologicalsagittalparametersinasymptomaticindianpopulation
AT vishnuvardhanrudravaram cervicalandthoracolumbarradiologicalsagittalparametersinasymptomaticindianpopulation