Cervical and thoracolumbar radiological sagittal parameters in asymptomatic Indian population
Introduction: There is a dearth of normative data for radiological sagittal parameters of asymptomatic Indians. The present study aimed to address this lacuna. Materials and Methods: Sagittal radiological parameters were studied in asymptomatic volunteers: seven lumbopelvic, i.e., pelvic index (PI),...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Indian Spine Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.isjonline.com/article.asp?issn=2589-5079;year=2021;volume=4;issue=2;spage=188;epage=197;aulast=Pithwa |
_version_ | 1829522111602884608 |
---|---|
author | Yogesh Kishorkant Pithwa Sanjeev Sankar Chandran Vishnu Vardhan Rudravaram |
author_facet | Yogesh Kishorkant Pithwa Sanjeev Sankar Chandran Vishnu Vardhan Rudravaram |
author_sort | Yogesh Kishorkant Pithwa |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Introduction: There is a dearth of normative data for radiological sagittal parameters of asymptomatic Indians. The present study aimed to address this lacuna. Materials and Methods: Sagittal radiological parameters were studied in asymptomatic volunteers: seven lumbopelvic, i.e., pelvic index (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), cranial LL (crLL), caudal LL (caLL), PI-LL; three thoracic and thoracolumbar, i.e., thoracolumbar alignment (TL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), T1 slope (TS0); five cervical, i.e., cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), cervical lordosis (CL), TS-CL, C2 slope (CS), C2 T1 pelvic angle (CTPA); and lastly, five global parameters: SVA, T9 spinopelvic inclination (T9SPI), T1 spinopelvic inclination (T1SPI), T1 pelvic angle (TPA), C2 pelvic angle (CPA) were studied. Results: Volunteers (n = 125) aged 41.49±12.93 years were included. Mean PI, PT, SS, LL, crLL, caLL, PI-LL, TL, TK, TS, cSVA, CL, TS-CL, CS, CTPA, SVA, T9SPI, T1SPI, TPA, and CPA were 47.23±8.04°, 13.4±6.61°, 33.68±4.59°, −56.19±7.83°, −22.71±9.82°, −45.02±10.07°, −7.83±9.4°, 9.99±11.17°, 22±7.33°, 4.88±7.64°, 34.77±12.2 mm, −6.36±10.99°, −0.5±10.02°, 2.56±9.53°, 3.54±1.04°, −36.49±23.4 mm, −10.89±2.75°, −7.88±2.17°, 5.52±6.82°, and 10.72±6.69°, respectively. As per Roussouly’s classification, the distribution for types I, II, III, and IV was 32 (25.6%), 41 (32.8%), 45 (36%), and 7 (5.6%), respectively. LL correlated significantly with PI, SS, and TK. TS had significant correlation with CL and TS-CL. cSVA significantly correlated with CL. PI-LL significantly correlated with TS-CL. CS significantly correlated with cSVA and TS-CL. TS-CL significantly correlated with cSVA. TPA correlated significantly with PT, SVA, PI, and PI-LL. CTPA correlated significantly with CL, cSVA, TK, and TS-CL. Males had significantly different SVA (−35.3 mm), TK (22.4°), TS (6.2°), TPA (6.35°), cSVA (37.1 mm), and CTPA (3.95°) when compared with females (−58.4 mm, 17.2°, −0.15°, 0.3°, 24.95 mm, and 2.85°, respectively) (P = 0.008, 0.003, 0.002, 0.003, 0.002, and 0.0005, respectively). Conclusion: Normative data for sagittal profile in Indian volunteers, enunciated in this study, can be used to guide decisions in surgery. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-16T15:27:37Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-be6eea01e95440a59832ce5c7530025e |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2589-5079 2589-5087 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-16T15:27:37Z |
publishDate | 2021-01-01 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
record_format | Article |
series | Indian Spine Journal |
spelling | doaj.art-be6eea01e95440a59832ce5c7530025e2022-12-21T22:26:28ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Spine Journal2589-50792589-50872021-01-014218819710.4103/ISJ.ISJ_92_20Cervical and thoracolumbar radiological sagittal parameters in asymptomatic Indian populationYogesh Kishorkant PithwaSanjeev Sankar ChandranVishnu Vardhan RudravaramIntroduction: There is a dearth of normative data for radiological sagittal parameters of asymptomatic Indians. The present study aimed to address this lacuna. Materials and Methods: Sagittal radiological parameters were studied in asymptomatic volunteers: seven lumbopelvic, i.e., pelvic index (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), cranial LL (crLL), caudal LL (caLL), PI-LL; three thoracic and thoracolumbar, i.e., thoracolumbar alignment (TL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), T1 slope (TS0); five cervical, i.e., cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), cervical lordosis (CL), TS-CL, C2 slope (CS), C2 T1 pelvic angle (CTPA); and lastly, five global parameters: SVA, T9 spinopelvic inclination (T9SPI), T1 spinopelvic inclination (T1SPI), T1 pelvic angle (TPA), C2 pelvic angle (CPA) were studied. Results: Volunteers (n = 125) aged 41.49±12.93 years were included. Mean PI, PT, SS, LL, crLL, caLL, PI-LL, TL, TK, TS, cSVA, CL, TS-CL, CS, CTPA, SVA, T9SPI, T1SPI, TPA, and CPA were 47.23±8.04°, 13.4±6.61°, 33.68±4.59°, −56.19±7.83°, −22.71±9.82°, −45.02±10.07°, −7.83±9.4°, 9.99±11.17°, 22±7.33°, 4.88±7.64°, 34.77±12.2 mm, −6.36±10.99°, −0.5±10.02°, 2.56±9.53°, 3.54±1.04°, −36.49±23.4 mm, −10.89±2.75°, −7.88±2.17°, 5.52±6.82°, and 10.72±6.69°, respectively. As per Roussouly’s classification, the distribution for types I, II, III, and IV was 32 (25.6%), 41 (32.8%), 45 (36%), and 7 (5.6%), respectively. LL correlated significantly with PI, SS, and TK. TS had significant correlation with CL and TS-CL. cSVA significantly correlated with CL. PI-LL significantly correlated with TS-CL. CS significantly correlated with cSVA and TS-CL. TS-CL significantly correlated with cSVA. TPA correlated significantly with PT, SVA, PI, and PI-LL. CTPA correlated significantly with CL, cSVA, TK, and TS-CL. Males had significantly different SVA (−35.3 mm), TK (22.4°), TS (6.2°), TPA (6.35°), cSVA (37.1 mm), and CTPA (3.95°) when compared with females (−58.4 mm, 17.2°, −0.15°, 0.3°, 24.95 mm, and 2.85°, respectively) (P = 0.008, 0.003, 0.002, 0.003, 0.002, and 0.0005, respectively). Conclusion: Normative data for sagittal profile in Indian volunteers, enunciated in this study, can be used to guide decisions in surgery.http://www.isjonline.com/article.asp?issn=2589-5079;year=2021;volume=4;issue=2;spage=188;epage=197;aulast=Pithwaasymptomaticcervicalindianlumbarsagittalsagittal radiologicalsagittal radiological parametersspinethoracolumbar |
spellingShingle | Yogesh Kishorkant Pithwa Sanjeev Sankar Chandran Vishnu Vardhan Rudravaram Cervical and thoracolumbar radiological sagittal parameters in asymptomatic Indian population Indian Spine Journal asymptomatic cervical indian lumbar sagittal sagittal radiological sagittal radiological parameters spine thoracolumbar |
title | Cervical and thoracolumbar radiological sagittal parameters in asymptomatic Indian population |
title_full | Cervical and thoracolumbar radiological sagittal parameters in asymptomatic Indian population |
title_fullStr | Cervical and thoracolumbar radiological sagittal parameters in asymptomatic Indian population |
title_full_unstemmed | Cervical and thoracolumbar radiological sagittal parameters in asymptomatic Indian population |
title_short | Cervical and thoracolumbar radiological sagittal parameters in asymptomatic Indian population |
title_sort | cervical and thoracolumbar radiological sagittal parameters in asymptomatic indian population |
topic | asymptomatic cervical indian lumbar sagittal sagittal radiological sagittal radiological parameters spine thoracolumbar |
url | http://www.isjonline.com/article.asp?issn=2589-5079;year=2021;volume=4;issue=2;spage=188;epage=197;aulast=Pithwa |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yogeshkishorkantpithwa cervicalandthoracolumbarradiologicalsagittalparametersinasymptomaticindianpopulation AT sanjeevsankarchandran cervicalandthoracolumbarradiologicalsagittalparametersinasymptomaticindianpopulation AT vishnuvardhanrudravaram cervicalandthoracolumbarradiologicalsagittalparametersinasymptomaticindianpopulation |