Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris in root canals prepared by single-file reciprocating and single file rotary instrumentation systems: A comparative In vitro study

Background: Prevention of the debris from extruding to the periapical region is an important aspect to be taken care of as its extrusion can result in pain, periapical inflammation, and delayed healing owing to the presence of highly infective components in the debris. Aim: The present trial was aim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sonal Sinha, Konark Singh, Anju Singh, Swati Priya, Avanindra Kumar, Sahil Kawle
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2021;volume=13;issue=6;spage=1398;epage=1401;aulast=Sinha
_version_ 1819002709395636224
author Sonal Sinha
Konark Singh
Anju Singh
Swati Priya
Avanindra Kumar
Sahil Kawle
author_facet Sonal Sinha
Konark Singh
Anju Singh
Swati Priya
Avanindra Kumar
Sahil Kawle
author_sort Sonal Sinha
collection DOAJ
description Background: Prevention of the debris from extruding to the periapical region is an important aspect to be taken care of as its extrusion can result in pain, periapical inflammation, and delayed healing owing to the presence of highly infective components in the debris. Aim: The present trial was aimed to compare and assess the amount of debris extruded apically using the single-file reciprocating system - WaveOne GOLD and single file rotary system - OneShape in root canal preparations in vitro. Materials and Methods: Thirty mandibular premolars were divided into two groups (15 samples each) prepared with a single-file reciprocating system - WaveOne GOLD and single-file rotary system - OneShape. Debris extruded was collected and then stored in an incubator. The final weight was calculated after obtaining the mean of three consecutive weights obtained for each tooth. The data were compared using the ANOVA and Turkey's post hoc analysis. Results: Debris extrusions were recorded in both groups and analysis revealed statistical differences in weight before and after the instrumentation procedures in both groups. When compared, reciprocating single file – WaveOne GOLD extruded more debris than rotary single file system – OneShape with a P < 0.001. Conclusions: The rotary instrumentation systems extrude lesser debris apically than the reciprocating instrumentation system. The difference found was statistically significant.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T23:09:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-be72b5703de844ba973a57e0ed1dc64f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0975-7406
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T23:09:25Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
spelling doaj.art-be72b5703de844ba973a57e0ed1dc64f2022-12-21T19:23:47ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences0975-74062021-01-011361398140110.4103/jpbs.jpbs_225_21Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris in root canals prepared by single-file reciprocating and single file rotary instrumentation systems: A comparative In vitro studySonal SinhaKonark SinghAnju SinghSwati PriyaAvanindra KumarSahil KawleBackground: Prevention of the debris from extruding to the periapical region is an important aspect to be taken care of as its extrusion can result in pain, periapical inflammation, and delayed healing owing to the presence of highly infective components in the debris. Aim: The present trial was aimed to compare and assess the amount of debris extruded apically using the single-file reciprocating system - WaveOne GOLD and single file rotary system - OneShape in root canal preparations in vitro. Materials and Methods: Thirty mandibular premolars were divided into two groups (15 samples each) prepared with a single-file reciprocating system - WaveOne GOLD and single-file rotary system - OneShape. Debris extruded was collected and then stored in an incubator. The final weight was calculated after obtaining the mean of three consecutive weights obtained for each tooth. The data were compared using the ANOVA and Turkey's post hoc analysis. Results: Debris extrusions were recorded in both groups and analysis revealed statistical differences in weight before and after the instrumentation procedures in both groups. When compared, reciprocating single file – WaveOne GOLD extruded more debris than rotary single file system – OneShape with a P < 0.001. Conclusions: The rotary instrumentation systems extrude lesser debris apically than the reciprocating instrumentation system. The difference found was statistically significant.http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2021;volume=13;issue=6;spage=1398;epage=1401;aulast=Sinhaapical extrusiondebrisirrigationoneshapereciprocating motionrotating motionwaveone gold
spellingShingle Sonal Sinha
Konark Singh
Anju Singh
Swati Priya
Avanindra Kumar
Sahil Kawle
Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris in root canals prepared by single-file reciprocating and single file rotary instrumentation systems: A comparative In vitro study
Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
apical extrusion
debris
irrigation
oneshape
reciprocating motion
rotating motion
waveone gold
title Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris in root canals prepared by single-file reciprocating and single file rotary instrumentation systems: A comparative In vitro study
title_full Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris in root canals prepared by single-file reciprocating and single file rotary instrumentation systems: A comparative In vitro study
title_fullStr Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris in root canals prepared by single-file reciprocating and single file rotary instrumentation systems: A comparative In vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris in root canals prepared by single-file reciprocating and single file rotary instrumentation systems: A comparative In vitro study
title_short Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris in root canals prepared by single-file reciprocating and single file rotary instrumentation systems: A comparative In vitro study
title_sort quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris in root canals prepared by single file reciprocating and single file rotary instrumentation systems a comparative in vitro study
topic apical extrusion
debris
irrigation
oneshape
reciprocating motion
rotating motion
waveone gold
url http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2021;volume=13;issue=6;spage=1398;epage=1401;aulast=Sinha
work_keys_str_mv AT sonalsinha quantitativeevaluationofapicallyextrudeddebrisinrootcanalspreparedbysinglefilereciprocatingandsinglefilerotaryinstrumentationsystemsacomparativeinvitrostudy
AT konarksingh quantitativeevaluationofapicallyextrudeddebrisinrootcanalspreparedbysinglefilereciprocatingandsinglefilerotaryinstrumentationsystemsacomparativeinvitrostudy
AT anjusingh quantitativeevaluationofapicallyextrudeddebrisinrootcanalspreparedbysinglefilereciprocatingandsinglefilerotaryinstrumentationsystemsacomparativeinvitrostudy
AT swatipriya quantitativeevaluationofapicallyextrudeddebrisinrootcanalspreparedbysinglefilereciprocatingandsinglefilerotaryinstrumentationsystemsacomparativeinvitrostudy
AT avanindrakumar quantitativeevaluationofapicallyextrudeddebrisinrootcanalspreparedbysinglefilereciprocatingandsinglefilerotaryinstrumentationsystemsacomparativeinvitrostudy
AT sahilkawle quantitativeevaluationofapicallyextrudeddebrisinrootcanalspreparedbysinglefilereciprocatingandsinglefilerotaryinstrumentationsystemsacomparativeinvitrostudy