Judicial Performance Review in Arizona: A Critical Assessment
<p>Judicial performance evaluations are a relatively new tool for assessing judges and providing information to voters to help them determine whether to retain judges in contested or retention elections. Arizona implemented its judicial evaluation program about 20 years ago, and since that tim...
Main Authors: | Rebecca White Berch, Erin Norris Bass |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law
2014-12-01
|
Series: | Oñati Socio-Legal Series |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ssrn.com/abstract=2533868 |
Similar Items
-
Thinking about Judges and Judicial Performance: Perspective of the Public and Court Users
by: David Rottman, et al.
Published: (2014-12-01) -
Methodologies for Measuring Judicial Performance: The Problem of Bias
by: Jennifer Elek, et al.
Published: (2014-12-01) -
Judicial Performance and Experiences of Judicial Work: Findings from Socio-legal Research
by: Sharyn Roach Anleu, et al.
Published: (2014-12-01) -
Evaluating Judicial Performance Evaluation: A Conceptual Analysis
by: Joe McIntyre
Published: (2014-12-01) -
Evaluating Judicial Performance: Editors’ Introduction
by: Francesco Contini, et al.
Published: (2014-12-01)