Cranial form differences in goats by breed and domestic status
Abstract Domestic goats (Capra hircus) are globally represented by over 300 breeds, making them a useful model for investigating patterns of morphological change related to domestication. However, they have been little studied, likely due to their poor representation in museum collections and the di...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2024-01-01
|
| Series: | Scientific Reports |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50357-0 |
| _version_ | 1797355811194798080 |
|---|---|
| author | A. M. Balcarcel M. Geiger M. R. Sánchez-Villagra |
| author_facet | A. M. Balcarcel M. Geiger M. R. Sánchez-Villagra |
| author_sort | A. M. Balcarcel |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Domestic goats (Capra hircus) are globally represented by over 300 breeds, making them a useful model for investigating patterns of morphological change related to domestication. However, they have been little studied, likely due to their poor representation in museum collections and the difficulty in obtaining truly wild goat (Capra aegagrus, the bezoar) samples. Similar studies on other species reveal that domestication correlates with craniofacial alterations in domestics, which are non-uniform and often species-specific. Here, we use three-dimensional geometric morphometric methods (3DGMM) to describe and quantify cranial shape variation in wild (n = 21) versus domestic (n = 54) goats. We find that mean cranial shapes differ significantly between wild and domestic goats as well as between certain breeds. The detected differences are lower in magnitude than those reported for other domestic groups, possibly explained by the fewer directions of artificial selection in goat breeding, and their low global genetic diversity compared to other livestock. We also find tooth-row length reduction in the domestics, suggestive of rostral shortening—a prediction of the “domestication syndrome” (DS). The goat model thus expands the array—and combinations of—morphological changes observed under domestication, notably detecting alterations to the calvarium form which could be related to the ~ 15% brain size reduction previously reported for domestic compared to wild goats. The global success of domestic goats is due more to their ability to survive in a variety of harsh environments than to systematized human management. Nonetheless, their domestication has resulted in a clear disruption from the wild cranial form, suggesting that even low-intensity selection can lead to significant morphological changes under domestication. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T14:16:28Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-be8196076e684d8a9edf35939c28df1d |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2045-2322 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T14:16:28Z |
| publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
| publisher | Nature Portfolio |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Scientific Reports |
| spelling | doaj.art-be8196076e684d8a9edf35939c28df1d2024-01-14T12:22:46ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222024-01-0114111310.1038/s41598-023-50357-0Cranial form differences in goats by breed and domestic statusA. M. Balcarcel0M. Geiger1M. R. Sánchez-Villagra2Department of Paleontology, University of ZurichNaturmuseum St.GallenDepartment of Paleontology, University of ZurichAbstract Domestic goats (Capra hircus) are globally represented by over 300 breeds, making them a useful model for investigating patterns of morphological change related to domestication. However, they have been little studied, likely due to their poor representation in museum collections and the difficulty in obtaining truly wild goat (Capra aegagrus, the bezoar) samples. Similar studies on other species reveal that domestication correlates with craniofacial alterations in domestics, which are non-uniform and often species-specific. Here, we use three-dimensional geometric morphometric methods (3DGMM) to describe and quantify cranial shape variation in wild (n = 21) versus domestic (n = 54) goats. We find that mean cranial shapes differ significantly between wild and domestic goats as well as between certain breeds. The detected differences are lower in magnitude than those reported for other domestic groups, possibly explained by the fewer directions of artificial selection in goat breeding, and their low global genetic diversity compared to other livestock. We also find tooth-row length reduction in the domestics, suggestive of rostral shortening—a prediction of the “domestication syndrome” (DS). The goat model thus expands the array—and combinations of—morphological changes observed under domestication, notably detecting alterations to the calvarium form which could be related to the ~ 15% brain size reduction previously reported for domestic compared to wild goats. The global success of domestic goats is due more to their ability to survive in a variety of harsh environments than to systematized human management. Nonetheless, their domestication has resulted in a clear disruption from the wild cranial form, suggesting that even low-intensity selection can lead to significant morphological changes under domestication.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50357-0 |
| spellingShingle | A. M. Balcarcel M. Geiger M. R. Sánchez-Villagra Cranial form differences in goats by breed and domestic status Scientific Reports |
| title | Cranial form differences in goats by breed and domestic status |
| title_full | Cranial form differences in goats by breed and domestic status |
| title_fullStr | Cranial form differences in goats by breed and domestic status |
| title_full_unstemmed | Cranial form differences in goats by breed and domestic status |
| title_short | Cranial form differences in goats by breed and domestic status |
| title_sort | cranial form differences in goats by breed and domestic status |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50357-0 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ambalcarcel cranialformdifferencesingoatsbybreedanddomesticstatus AT mgeiger cranialformdifferencesingoatsbybreedanddomesticstatus AT mrsanchezvillagra cranialformdifferencesingoatsbybreedanddomesticstatus |