Evaluation of three methods for preservation of Azotobacter: freeze-drying, cryopreservation, and immobilization in dry polymers
Because the use of bacteria for biotechnological processes requires maintaining their viability and geneticstability, preserving them becomes essential. Here, we evaluated three preservation methods for A.chroococcum C26 and A. vinelandii C27; preservation methods: cryopreservation and immobilizatio...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
2013-04-01
|
| Series: | Universitas Scientiarum |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/scientarium/article/view/4404 |
| _version_ | 1819267189477212160 |
|---|---|
| author | Daniel Fernando Rojas Tapias Mabel Patricia Ortiz Vera Diego Rivera Botia Joseph Kloepper Ruth Rebeca Bonilla Buitrago |
| author_facet | Daniel Fernando Rojas Tapias Mabel Patricia Ortiz Vera Diego Rivera Botia Joseph Kloepper Ruth Rebeca Bonilla Buitrago |
| author_sort | Daniel Fernando Rojas Tapias |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Because the use of bacteria for biotechnological processes requires maintaining their viability and geneticstability, preserving them becomes essential. Here, we evaluated three preservation methods for A.chroococcum C26 and A. vinelandii C27; preservation methods: cryopreservation and immobilization in drypolymers for 60 days, and freeze-drying for 30. We evaluated their efficiency by counting viable cells andmeasuring nitrogen fixation activity. Additionally, we assessed the effect of three protective agents forfreeze-drying, three for cryopreservation, and four polymers. Freeze-drying proved the best technique tomaintain viability and activity, followed by immobilization and cryopreservation. Bacterial nitrogen fixingability remained unchanged using the freeze-drying method, and bacterial survival exceeded 80%; S/BSAwas the best protective agent. Immobilization maintained bacterial survival over 80%, but nitrogen fixationwas decreased by 20%. Lastly, cryopreservation resulted in a dramatic loss of viability for C26 (BSRapprox. 70%), whereas C27 was well preserved. Nitrogen fixation for both strains decreased regardless ofthe cryoprotective agent used (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the success of Azotobacter preservation methodsdepend on the technique, the protective agent, and the strain used. Our results also indicated that freezedryingusing S/BSA is the best technique to preserve bacteria of this genus. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-23T21:13:13Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-be8de11c9f2b45efa0d33278143e552a |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0122-7483 2027-1352 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-23T21:13:13Z |
| publishDate | 2013-04-01 |
| publisher | Pontificia Universidad Javeriana |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Universitas Scientiarum |
| spelling | doaj.art-be8de11c9f2b45efa0d33278143e552a2022-12-21T17:31:01ZengPontificia Universidad JaverianaUniversitas Scientiarum0122-74832027-13522013-04-0118212913910.11144/Javeriana.SC18-2.etmpEvaluation of three methods for preservation of Azotobacter: freeze-drying, cryopreservation, and immobilization in dry polymersDaniel Fernando Rojas TapiasMabel Patricia Ortiz VeraDiego Rivera BotiaJoseph KloepperRuth Rebeca Bonilla BuitragoBecause the use of bacteria for biotechnological processes requires maintaining their viability and geneticstability, preserving them becomes essential. Here, we evaluated three preservation methods for A.chroococcum C26 and A. vinelandii C27; preservation methods: cryopreservation and immobilization in drypolymers for 60 days, and freeze-drying for 30. We evaluated their efficiency by counting viable cells andmeasuring nitrogen fixation activity. Additionally, we assessed the effect of three protective agents forfreeze-drying, three for cryopreservation, and four polymers. Freeze-drying proved the best technique tomaintain viability and activity, followed by immobilization and cryopreservation. Bacterial nitrogen fixingability remained unchanged using the freeze-drying method, and bacterial survival exceeded 80%; S/BSAwas the best protective agent. Immobilization maintained bacterial survival over 80%, but nitrogen fixationwas decreased by 20%. Lastly, cryopreservation resulted in a dramatic loss of viability for C26 (BSRapprox. 70%), whereas C27 was well preserved. Nitrogen fixation for both strains decreased regardless ofthe cryoprotective agent used (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the success of Azotobacter preservation methodsdepend on the technique, the protective agent, and the strain used. Our results also indicated that freezedryingusing S/BSA is the best technique to preserve bacteria of this genus.http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/scientarium/article/view/4404Azotobacterbacterial preservationcryopreservationfreeze-dryingimmobilization in polymersbacterial nitrogen fixation. |
| spellingShingle | Daniel Fernando Rojas Tapias Mabel Patricia Ortiz Vera Diego Rivera Botia Joseph Kloepper Ruth Rebeca Bonilla Buitrago Evaluation of three methods for preservation of Azotobacter: freeze-drying, cryopreservation, and immobilization in dry polymers Universitas Scientiarum Azotobacter bacterial preservation cryopreservation freeze-drying immobilization in polymers bacterial nitrogen fixation. |
| title | Evaluation of three methods for preservation of Azotobacter: freeze-drying, cryopreservation, and immobilization in dry polymers |
| title_full | Evaluation of three methods for preservation of Azotobacter: freeze-drying, cryopreservation, and immobilization in dry polymers |
| title_fullStr | Evaluation of three methods for preservation of Azotobacter: freeze-drying, cryopreservation, and immobilization in dry polymers |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of three methods for preservation of Azotobacter: freeze-drying, cryopreservation, and immobilization in dry polymers |
| title_short | Evaluation of three methods for preservation of Azotobacter: freeze-drying, cryopreservation, and immobilization in dry polymers |
| title_sort | evaluation of three methods for preservation of azotobacter freeze drying cryopreservation and immobilization in dry polymers |
| topic | Azotobacter bacterial preservation cryopreservation freeze-drying immobilization in polymers bacterial nitrogen fixation. |
| url | http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/scientarium/article/view/4404 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT danielfernandorojastapias evaluationofthreemethodsforpreservationofazotobacterfreezedryingcryopreservationandimmobilizationindrypolymers AT mabelpatriciaortizvera evaluationofthreemethodsforpreservationofazotobacterfreezedryingcryopreservationandimmobilizationindrypolymers AT diegoriverabotia evaluationofthreemethodsforpreservationofazotobacterfreezedryingcryopreservationandimmobilizationindrypolymers AT josephkloepper evaluationofthreemethodsforpreservationofazotobacterfreezedryingcryopreservationandimmobilizationindrypolymers AT ruthrebecabonillabuitrago evaluationofthreemethodsforpreservationofazotobacterfreezedryingcryopreservationandimmobilizationindrypolymers |