Theistic metaphysics of George Berkley’s "Alciphron"

The article examines George Berkeley’s philosophy of the 1730s, a period that is seldom analyzed by commentators. The article puts forward two theses. First, in 'Alciphron’ (in particular, in dialogues IV and VII) Berkeley offers a new metaphysics in comparison with immaterialism, which can be...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Artem Besedin
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: St. Tikhon's Orthodox University 2022-12-01
Series:Вестник Православного Свято-Тихоновского гуманитарного университета: Серия I. Богословие, философия
Subjects:
Online Access:https://periodical.pstgu.ru/ru/pdf/article/7976
_version_ 1811158213651857408
author Artem Besedin
author_facet Artem Besedin
author_sort Artem Besedin
collection DOAJ
description The article examines George Berkeley’s philosophy of the 1730s, a period that is seldom analyzed by commentators. The article puts forward two theses. First, in 'Alciphron’ (in particular, in dialogues IV and VII) Berkeley offers a new metaphysics in comparison with immaterialism, which can be described as descriptive, using P.F. Stroson's terminology. Second, in Berkeley's philosophical system, 'Alciphron’ should take the first place — the place of introduction. These theses are supported by analyzing the argument for the existence of the Christian God, presented in the fourth dialogue. The article shows that this argument, which is considered by most researchers only as plausible, can be strengthened by referring to the content of the seventh dialogue. The analysis of the seventh dialogue shows the importance of the so-called natural notions for Berkeley's argumentation in 'Alciphron’. Natural notions are accepted by us without any theoretical justification, they are rooted in human nature. Such natural notions include the concept of accountability. It is connected to many other concepts that characterize our attitude to the actions of free agents (for example, guilt and merit). Our reactions to human actions are similar to reactions to the language of the Creator revealed to us in nature (in the case of God our reaction is praise based on admiration for nature). Natural concepts underlie Berkeley's descriptive metaphysics, the main idea of which is that we cannot but consider phenomena as the result of the actions of free rational agents (finite and infinite). This is justified by a transcendental argument: the condition for the existence of society is belief in natural concepts; society exists and is a natural state for man; therefore, we believe in natural concepts. The use of transcendental argumentation supports the thesis the metaphysics of 'Alciphron' is descriptive.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T05:20:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-be92fc0381224cf184a5100ddefaf83a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1991-640X
2409-4692
language Russian
last_indexed 2024-04-10T05:20:38Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher St. Tikhon's Orthodox University
record_format Article
series Вестник Православного Свято-Тихоновского гуманитарного университета: Серия I. Богословие, философия
spelling doaj.art-be92fc0381224cf184a5100ddefaf83a2023-03-08T10:12:04ZrusSt. Tikhon's Orthodox UniversityВестник Православного Свято-Тихоновского гуманитарного университета: Серия I. Богословие, философия1991-640X2409-46922022-12-0110410486103http://dx.doi.org/10.15382/sturI2022104.86-1037Theistic metaphysics of George Berkley’s "Alciphron"Artem Besedin0Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Philosophy, Department of History of World Philosophy, 27/4 Lomonosovsky prospekt, Moscow, 119234, Russian FederationThe article examines George Berkeley’s philosophy of the 1730s, a period that is seldom analyzed by commentators. The article puts forward two theses. First, in 'Alciphron’ (in particular, in dialogues IV and VII) Berkeley offers a new metaphysics in comparison with immaterialism, which can be described as descriptive, using P.F. Stroson's terminology. Second, in Berkeley's philosophical system, 'Alciphron’ should take the first place — the place of introduction. These theses are supported by analyzing the argument for the existence of the Christian God, presented in the fourth dialogue. The article shows that this argument, which is considered by most researchers only as plausible, can be strengthened by referring to the content of the seventh dialogue. The analysis of the seventh dialogue shows the importance of the so-called natural notions for Berkeley's argumentation in 'Alciphron’. Natural notions are accepted by us without any theoretical justification, they are rooted in human nature. Such natural notions include the concept of accountability. It is connected to many other concepts that characterize our attitude to the actions of free agents (for example, guilt and merit). Our reactions to human actions are similar to reactions to the language of the Creator revealed to us in nature (in the case of God our reaction is praise based on admiration for nature). Natural concepts underlie Berkeley's descriptive metaphysics, the main idea of which is that we cannot but consider phenomena as the result of the actions of free rational agents (finite and infinite). This is justified by a transcendental argument: the condition for the existence of society is belief in natural concepts; society exists and is a natural state for man; therefore, we believe in natural concepts. The use of transcendental argumentation supports the thesis the metaphysics of 'Alciphron' is descriptive.https://periodical.pstgu.ru/ru/pdf/article/7976george berkeley descriptive metaphysics proof of the existence of god physico-theological proof transcendental argumentation free will accountability.джордж беркли дескриптивная метафизика доказательство бытия бога физико-теологическое доказательство трансцендентальный аргумент свобода воли ответственность.
spellingShingle Artem Besedin
Theistic metaphysics of George Berkley’s "Alciphron"
Вестник Православного Свято-Тихоновского гуманитарного университета: Серия I. Богословие, философия
george berkeley
descriptive metaphysics
proof of the existence of god
physico-theological proof
transcendental argumentation
free will
accountability.
джордж беркли
дескриптивная метафизика
доказательство бытия бога
физико-теологическое доказательство
трансцендентальный аргумент
свобода воли
ответственность.
title Theistic metaphysics of George Berkley’s "Alciphron"
title_full Theistic metaphysics of George Berkley’s "Alciphron"
title_fullStr Theistic metaphysics of George Berkley’s "Alciphron"
title_full_unstemmed Theistic metaphysics of George Berkley’s "Alciphron"
title_short Theistic metaphysics of George Berkley’s "Alciphron"
title_sort theistic metaphysics of george berkley s alciphron
topic george berkeley
descriptive metaphysics
proof of the existence of god
physico-theological proof
transcendental argumentation
free will
accountability.
джордж беркли
дескриптивная метафизика
доказательство бытия бога
физико-теологическое доказательство
трансцендентальный аргумент
свобода воли
ответственность.
url https://periodical.pstgu.ru/ru/pdf/article/7976
work_keys_str_mv AT artembesedin theisticmetaphysicsofgeorgeberkleysalciphron