Unveiling the Dot-Perspective Task: Integrating Implicit-Mentalistic with Sub-Mentalistic Processes

Adults’ performances on the dot-perspective task showed a consistency effect: participants were slower to judge their own visual perspective when their own perspective and others’ perspective were different compared to when both perspectives were the same. This effect has been explained by two compe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cong Fan, Tirta Susilo, Jason Low
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-11-01
Series:Psych
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2624-8611/5/4/78
_version_ 1827573729630093312
author Cong Fan
Tirta Susilo
Jason Low
author_facet Cong Fan
Tirta Susilo
Jason Low
author_sort Cong Fan
collection DOAJ
description Adults’ performances on the dot-perspective task showed a consistency effect: participants were slower to judge their own visual perspective when their own perspective and others’ perspective were different compared to when both perspectives were the same. This effect has been explained by two competing accounts: the implicit mentalising account suggests the effect arises from relatively automatic tracking of others’ visual perspectives, whereas the submentalising account suggests the effect arises from domain-general attentional orienting. We conducted three experiments to adjudicate between the two competing accounts. Experiment 1 manipulated eye–head directional cues (gaze-averted-face versus head-averted-face) and measured its effect on implicit mentalising (in the dot-perspective task) and attentional orienting (in the Posner task). Eye–head directional cues modulated attentional orienting but not implicit mentalising, supporting the importance of visual access and the existence of implicit mentalising in the dot-perspective task. Experiment 2 compared the effect of gaze-averted versus finger-pointing agents. Finger-pointing direction might induce attentional orienting effects on both tasks. Experiment 3 combined finger-pointing with manipulation of the agent’s visual access (eyes-sighted versus eyes-covered) on the dot-perspective task. Visual access did not modulate the consistency effect when finger-pointing was simultaneously displayed. The findings of Experiments 2 and 3 indicated the contribution of the sub-mentalistic process to the dot-perspective task. Overall, the findings suggest that implicit mentalising and submentalising may co-exist in human social perceptual processes. Visual access appears to play a dominant role in modulating implicit mentalising on the dot-perspective task, but the process may be interfered with by finger-pointing cues (more salient than gaze cues) via a sub-mentalistic attentional-orienting mechanism.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T20:25:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-be9d7e5e997e49abb7bf10b303c5d6e9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2624-8611
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T20:25:22Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Psych
spelling doaj.art-be9d7e5e997e49abb7bf10b303c5d6e92023-12-22T14:38:00ZengMDPI AGPsych2624-86112023-11-01541170119010.3390/psych5040078Unveiling the Dot-Perspective Task: Integrating Implicit-Mentalistic with Sub-Mentalistic ProcessesCong Fan0Tirta Susilo1Jason Low2Research Center of Brain and Cognitive Neuroscience, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, ChinaSchool of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington 6140, New ZealandSchool of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington 6140, New ZealandAdults’ performances on the dot-perspective task showed a consistency effect: participants were slower to judge their own visual perspective when their own perspective and others’ perspective were different compared to when both perspectives were the same. This effect has been explained by two competing accounts: the implicit mentalising account suggests the effect arises from relatively automatic tracking of others’ visual perspectives, whereas the submentalising account suggests the effect arises from domain-general attentional orienting. We conducted three experiments to adjudicate between the two competing accounts. Experiment 1 manipulated eye–head directional cues (gaze-averted-face versus head-averted-face) and measured its effect on implicit mentalising (in the dot-perspective task) and attentional orienting (in the Posner task). Eye–head directional cues modulated attentional orienting but not implicit mentalising, supporting the importance of visual access and the existence of implicit mentalising in the dot-perspective task. Experiment 2 compared the effect of gaze-averted versus finger-pointing agents. Finger-pointing direction might induce attentional orienting effects on both tasks. Experiment 3 combined finger-pointing with manipulation of the agent’s visual access (eyes-sighted versus eyes-covered) on the dot-perspective task. Visual access did not modulate the consistency effect when finger-pointing was simultaneously displayed. The findings of Experiments 2 and 3 indicated the contribution of the sub-mentalistic process to the dot-perspective task. Overall, the findings suggest that implicit mentalising and submentalising may co-exist in human social perceptual processes. Visual access appears to play a dominant role in modulating implicit mentalising on the dot-perspective task, but the process may be interfered with by finger-pointing cues (more salient than gaze cues) via a sub-mentalistic attentional-orienting mechanism.https://www.mdpi.com/2624-8611/5/4/78consistency effectimplicit mentalisingsubmentalisingattentional orientingcue-validity effect
spellingShingle Cong Fan
Tirta Susilo
Jason Low
Unveiling the Dot-Perspective Task: Integrating Implicit-Mentalistic with Sub-Mentalistic Processes
Psych
consistency effect
implicit mentalising
submentalising
attentional orienting
cue-validity effect
title Unveiling the Dot-Perspective Task: Integrating Implicit-Mentalistic with Sub-Mentalistic Processes
title_full Unveiling the Dot-Perspective Task: Integrating Implicit-Mentalistic with Sub-Mentalistic Processes
title_fullStr Unveiling the Dot-Perspective Task: Integrating Implicit-Mentalistic with Sub-Mentalistic Processes
title_full_unstemmed Unveiling the Dot-Perspective Task: Integrating Implicit-Mentalistic with Sub-Mentalistic Processes
title_short Unveiling the Dot-Perspective Task: Integrating Implicit-Mentalistic with Sub-Mentalistic Processes
title_sort unveiling the dot perspective task integrating implicit mentalistic with sub mentalistic processes
topic consistency effect
implicit mentalising
submentalising
attentional orienting
cue-validity effect
url https://www.mdpi.com/2624-8611/5/4/78
work_keys_str_mv AT congfan unveilingthedotperspectivetaskintegratingimplicitmentalisticwithsubmentalisticprocesses
AT tirtasusilo unveilingthedotperspectivetaskintegratingimplicitmentalisticwithsubmentalisticprocesses
AT jasonlow unveilingthedotperspectivetaskintegratingimplicitmentalisticwithsubmentalisticprocesses