The ALMaQUEST Survey. XIII. Understanding Radial Trends in Star Formation Quenching via the Relative Roles of Gas Availability and Star Formation Efficiency

Star formation quenching is one of the key processes that shape the evolution of galaxies. In this study, we investigate the changes in molecular gas and star formation properties as galaxies transit from the star-forming main sequence to the passive regime. Our analysis reveals that as galaxies mov...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hsi-An Pan, Lihwai Lin, Sara L. Ellison, Mallory D. Thorp, Sebastián F. Sánchez, Asa F. L. Bluck, Francesco Belfiore, Joanna M. Piotrowska, Jillian M. Scudder, William M. Baker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2024-01-01
Series:The Astrophysical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad28c1
_version_ 1797248771256483840
author Hsi-An Pan
Lihwai Lin
Sara L. Ellison
Mallory D. Thorp
Sebastián F. Sánchez
Asa F. L. Bluck
Francesco Belfiore
Joanna M. Piotrowska
Jillian M. Scudder
William M. Baker
author_facet Hsi-An Pan
Lihwai Lin
Sara L. Ellison
Mallory D. Thorp
Sebastián F. Sánchez
Asa F. L. Bluck
Francesco Belfiore
Joanna M. Piotrowska
Jillian M. Scudder
William M. Baker
author_sort Hsi-An Pan
collection DOAJ
description Star formation quenching is one of the key processes that shape the evolution of galaxies. In this study, we investigate the changes in molecular gas and star formation properties as galaxies transit from the star-forming main sequence to the passive regime. Our analysis reveals that as galaxies move away from the main sequence toward the green valley the radial profile of specific star formation rate surface density (Σ _sSFR ) is suppressed compared with main-sequence galaxies out to a galactocentric radius of 1.5 R _e (∼7 kpc for our sample). By combining radial profiles of gas fraction ( f _gas ) and star formation efficiency (SFE), we can discern the underlying mechanism that determines Σ _sSFR at different galactocentric radii. Analysis of relative contributions of f _gas and SFE to Σ _sSFR uncovers a diverse range of quenching modes. Star formation in approximately half of our quenching galaxies is primarily driven by a single mode (i.e., either f _gas or SFE), or a combination of both. A collective analysis of all galaxies reveals that the reduction in star formation within the central regions ( R < 0.5 R _e ) is primarily attributable to a decrease in SFE. Conversely, in the disk regions ( R > 0.5 R _e ), both f _gas and SFE contribute to the suppression of star formation. Our findings suggest that multiple quenching mechanisms may be at play in our sample galaxies, and even within a single galaxy. We also compare our observational outcomes with those from galaxy simulations and discuss the implications of our data.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T20:19:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-beb4ec73ab4b45ce9d0e1bec9d01a993
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1538-4357
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T20:19:53Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series The Astrophysical Journal
spelling doaj.art-beb4ec73ab4b45ce9d0e1bec9d01a9932024-03-22T10:01:34ZengIOP PublishingThe Astrophysical Journal1538-43572024-01-01964212010.3847/1538-4357/ad28c1The ALMaQUEST Survey. XIII. Understanding Radial Trends in Star Formation Quenching via the Relative Roles of Gas Availability and Star Formation EfficiencyHsi-An Pan0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1370-6964Lihwai Lin1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7218-7407Sara L. Ellison2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1768-1899Mallory D. Thorp3Sebastián F. Sánchez4https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6444-9307Asa F. L. Bluck5https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6395-4504Francesco Belfiore6https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2545-5752Joanna M. Piotrowska7Jillian M. Scudder8https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8798-3972William M. Baker9https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0215-1104Department of Physics, Tamkang University , No. 151, Yingzhuan Road, Tamsui District, New Taipei City 251301, TaiwanInstitute of Astronomy and Astrophysics , Academia Sinica, Taipei 10617, TaiwanDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria , Finnerty Road, Victoria, British Columbia V8P 1A1, CanadaDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria , Finnerty Road, Victoria, British Columbia V8P 1A1, Canada; Argelander-Institut für Astronomie, Universität Bonn , Auf dem Hügel 71, 53121 Bonn, GermanyInstituto de Astronomía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México , A.P. 70-264, C.P. 04510, México, D.F., MéxicoDepartment of Physics, Florida International University , 11200 SW 8th Street, Miami, FL 33199, USAINAF- Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri , Largo E. Fermi 5, I-50125, Florence, ItalyCahill Center for Astrophysics, California Institute of Technology , 1216 East California Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91125, USADepartment of Physics & Astronomy, Oberlin College , Oberlin, OH, 44074, USAKavli Institute for Cosmology, University of Cambridge , Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0HA, UK; Cavendish Laboratory–Astrophysics Group, University of Cambridge , 19 JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge, CB3 0HE, UKStar formation quenching is one of the key processes that shape the evolution of galaxies. In this study, we investigate the changes in molecular gas and star formation properties as galaxies transit from the star-forming main sequence to the passive regime. Our analysis reveals that as galaxies move away from the main sequence toward the green valley the radial profile of specific star formation rate surface density (Σ _sSFR ) is suppressed compared with main-sequence galaxies out to a galactocentric radius of 1.5 R _e (∼7 kpc for our sample). By combining radial profiles of gas fraction ( f _gas ) and star formation efficiency (SFE), we can discern the underlying mechanism that determines Σ _sSFR at different galactocentric radii. Analysis of relative contributions of f _gas and SFE to Σ _sSFR uncovers a diverse range of quenching modes. Star formation in approximately half of our quenching galaxies is primarily driven by a single mode (i.e., either f _gas or SFE), or a combination of both. A collective analysis of all galaxies reveals that the reduction in star formation within the central regions ( R < 0.5 R _e ) is primarily attributable to a decrease in SFE. Conversely, in the disk regions ( R > 0.5 R _e ), both f _gas and SFE contribute to the suppression of star formation. Our findings suggest that multiple quenching mechanisms may be at play in our sample galaxies, and even within a single galaxy. We also compare our observational outcomes with those from galaxy simulations and discuss the implications of our data.https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad28c1Galaxy evolutionInterstellar mediumStar formation
spellingShingle Hsi-An Pan
Lihwai Lin
Sara L. Ellison
Mallory D. Thorp
Sebastián F. Sánchez
Asa F. L. Bluck
Francesco Belfiore
Joanna M. Piotrowska
Jillian M. Scudder
William M. Baker
The ALMaQUEST Survey. XIII. Understanding Radial Trends in Star Formation Quenching via the Relative Roles of Gas Availability and Star Formation Efficiency
The Astrophysical Journal
Galaxy evolution
Interstellar medium
Star formation
title The ALMaQUEST Survey. XIII. Understanding Radial Trends in Star Formation Quenching via the Relative Roles of Gas Availability and Star Formation Efficiency
title_full The ALMaQUEST Survey. XIII. Understanding Radial Trends in Star Formation Quenching via the Relative Roles of Gas Availability and Star Formation Efficiency
title_fullStr The ALMaQUEST Survey. XIII. Understanding Radial Trends in Star Formation Quenching via the Relative Roles of Gas Availability and Star Formation Efficiency
title_full_unstemmed The ALMaQUEST Survey. XIII. Understanding Radial Trends in Star Formation Quenching via the Relative Roles of Gas Availability and Star Formation Efficiency
title_short The ALMaQUEST Survey. XIII. Understanding Radial Trends in Star Formation Quenching via the Relative Roles of Gas Availability and Star Formation Efficiency
title_sort almaquest survey xiii understanding radial trends in star formation quenching via the relative roles of gas availability and star formation efficiency
topic Galaxy evolution
Interstellar medium
Star formation
url https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad28c1
work_keys_str_mv AT hsianpan thealmaquestsurveyxiiiunderstandingradialtrendsinstarformationquenchingviatherelativerolesofgasavailabilityandstarformationefficiency
AT lihwailin thealmaquestsurveyxiiiunderstandingradialtrendsinstarformationquenchingviatherelativerolesofgasavailabilityandstarformationefficiency
AT saralellison thealmaquestsurveyxiiiunderstandingradialtrendsinstarformationquenchingviatherelativerolesofgasavailabilityandstarformationefficiency
AT mallorydthorp thealmaquestsurveyxiiiunderstandingradialtrendsinstarformationquenchingviatherelativerolesofgasavailabilityandstarformationefficiency
AT sebastianfsanchez thealmaquestsurveyxiiiunderstandingradialtrendsinstarformationquenchingviatherelativerolesofgasavailabilityandstarformationefficiency
AT asaflbluck thealmaquestsurveyxiiiunderstandingradialtrendsinstarformationquenchingviatherelativerolesofgasavailabilityandstarformationefficiency
AT francescobelfiore thealmaquestsurveyxiiiunderstandingradialtrendsinstarformationquenchingviatherelativerolesofgasavailabilityandstarformationefficiency
AT joannampiotrowska thealmaquestsurveyxiiiunderstandingradialtrendsinstarformationquenchingviatherelativerolesofgasavailabilityandstarformationefficiency
AT jillianmscudder thealmaquestsurveyxiiiunderstandingradialtrendsinstarformationquenchingviatherelativerolesofgasavailabilityandstarformationefficiency
AT williammbaker thealmaquestsurveyxiiiunderstandingradialtrendsinstarformationquenchingviatherelativerolesofgasavailabilityandstarformationefficiency
AT hsianpan almaquestsurveyxiiiunderstandingradialtrendsinstarformationquenchingviatherelativerolesofgasavailabilityandstarformationefficiency
AT lihwailin almaquestsurveyxiiiunderstandingradialtrendsinstarformationquenchingviatherelativerolesofgasavailabilityandstarformationefficiency
AT saralellison almaquestsurveyxiiiunderstandingradialtrendsinstarformationquenchingviatherelativerolesofgasavailabilityandstarformationefficiency
AT mallorydthorp almaquestsurveyxiiiunderstandingradialtrendsinstarformationquenchingviatherelativerolesofgasavailabilityandstarformationefficiency
AT sebastianfsanchez almaquestsurveyxiiiunderstandingradialtrendsinstarformationquenchingviatherelativerolesofgasavailabilityandstarformationefficiency
AT asaflbluck almaquestsurveyxiiiunderstandingradialtrendsinstarformationquenchingviatherelativerolesofgasavailabilityandstarformationefficiency
AT francescobelfiore almaquestsurveyxiiiunderstandingradialtrendsinstarformationquenchingviatherelativerolesofgasavailabilityandstarformationefficiency
AT joannampiotrowska almaquestsurveyxiiiunderstandingradialtrendsinstarformationquenchingviatherelativerolesofgasavailabilityandstarformationefficiency
AT jillianmscudder almaquestsurveyxiiiunderstandingradialtrendsinstarformationquenchingviatherelativerolesofgasavailabilityandstarformationefficiency
AT williammbaker almaquestsurveyxiiiunderstandingradialtrendsinstarformationquenchingviatherelativerolesofgasavailabilityandstarformationefficiency