Examining the utility of near infrared light as pre-exposure therapy to mitigate temporary noise-induced hearing loss in humans

IntroductionThis study sought to determine the effect of Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) compliant noise on auditory health and assess whether pre-noise near infrared (NIR) light therapy can mitigate the effects of noise exposure.MethodsOver four visits, participants (n = 30, NC...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Erin Williams, Kayla Minesinger, Hilary Gallagher, J. R. Stefanson, Nathaniel Bridges, Natalie Jackson, Valerie Stark, Jennifer Coto, Suhrud Rajguru, Kurt Yankaskas, Rick Rogers, Michael E. Hoffer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2024.1366239/full
_version_ 1827276464475602944
author Erin Williams
Erin Williams
Erin Williams
Kayla Minesinger
Kayla Minesinger
Hilary Gallagher
J. R. Stefanson
Nathaniel Bridges
Natalie Jackson
Valerie Stark
Jennifer Coto
Suhrud Rajguru
Suhrud Rajguru
Kurt Yankaskas
Rick Rogers
Michael E. Hoffer
Michael E. Hoffer
author_facet Erin Williams
Erin Williams
Erin Williams
Kayla Minesinger
Kayla Minesinger
Hilary Gallagher
J. R. Stefanson
Nathaniel Bridges
Natalie Jackson
Valerie Stark
Jennifer Coto
Suhrud Rajguru
Suhrud Rajguru
Kurt Yankaskas
Rick Rogers
Michael E. Hoffer
Michael E. Hoffer
author_sort Erin Williams
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionThis study sought to determine the effect of Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) compliant noise on auditory health and assess whether pre-noise near infrared (NIR) light therapy can mitigate the effects of noise exposure.MethodsOver four visits, participants (n = 30, NCT#: 03834714) with normal hearing completed baseline hearing health assessments followed by exposure to open ear, continuous pink noise at 94 dBA for 15 min. Immediately thereafter, post-noise hearing tests at 3000, 4000, and 6000 Hz and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) were conducted along with the Modified Rhyme Test (MRT), Masking Level Difference Test (MLD), and Fixed Level Frequency Tests (FLFT) [collectively referred to as the Central and Peripheral Auditory Test Battery (CPATB)] to acquire baseline noise sensitivity profiles. Participants were then randomized to either Active or Sham NIR light therapy for 30 min binaurally to conclude Visit 1. Visit 2 (≥24 and ≤ 48 h from Visit 1) began with an additional 30-min session of Active NIR light therapy or Sham followed by repeat CPATB testing and noise exposure. Post-noise testing was again conducted immediately after noise exposure to assess the effect of NIR light therapy. The remaining visits were conducted following ≥2 weeks of noise rest in a cross-over design (i.e., those who had received Active NIR light therapy in Visits 1 and 2 received Sham therapy in Visits 3 and 4).ResultsRecovery hearing tests and DPOAEs were completed at the end of each visit. Participants experienced temporary threshold shifts (TTS) immediately following noise exposure, with a mean shift of 6.79 dB HL (±6.25), 10.61 dB HL (±6.89), and 7.30 dB HL (±7.25) at 3000, 4000, and 6000 Hz, respectively, though all thresholds returned to baseline at 3000, 4000, and 6000 Hz within 75 min of noise exposure. Paradoxically, Active NIR light therapy threshold shifts were statistically higher than Sham therapy at 3000 Hz (p = 0.04), but no other differences were observed at the other frequencies tested. An age sub-analysis demonstrated that TTS among younger adults were generally larger in the Sham therapy group versus Active therapy, though this was not statistically different. There were no differences in CPATB test results across Active or Sham groups. Finally, we observed no changes in auditory function or central processing following noise exposure, suggestive of healthy and resilient inner ears.ConclusionIn this study, locally administered NIR prior to noise exposure did not induce a significant protective effect in mitigating noise-induced TTS. Further exploration is needed to implement effective dosage and administration for this promising otoprotective therapy.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T06:49:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bec93cf5a5ba4bafb6d39d6e2eb96414
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-2295
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T06:49:10Z
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neurology
spelling doaj.art-bec93cf5a5ba4bafb6d39d6e2eb964142024-04-22T14:24:42ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurology1664-22952024-04-011510.3389/fneur.2024.13662391366239Examining the utility of near infrared light as pre-exposure therapy to mitigate temporary noise-induced hearing loss in humansErin Williams0Erin Williams1Erin Williams2Kayla Minesinger3Kayla Minesinger4Hilary Gallagher5J. R. Stefanson6Nathaniel Bridges7Natalie Jackson8Valerie Stark9Jennifer Coto10Suhrud Rajguru11Suhrud Rajguru12Kurt Yankaskas13Rick Rogers14Michael E. Hoffer15Michael E. Hoffer16Department of Otolaryngology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United StatesDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United StatesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, United StatesDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United StatesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, United StatesAir Force Research Laboratory, 711th Human Performance Wing, Airman Systems Directorate, Dayton, OH, United StatesU.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory, Fort Rucker, AL, United StatesAir Force Research Laboratory, 711th Human Performance Wing, Airman Systems Directorate, Dayton, OH, United StatesOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, TN, United StatesUniversity of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United StatesDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United StatesDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United StatesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, United StatesBioInnovations Institute, Natick, MA, United StatesBioInnovations Institute, Natick, MA, United StatesDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United StatesDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United StatesIntroductionThis study sought to determine the effect of Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) compliant noise on auditory health and assess whether pre-noise near infrared (NIR) light therapy can mitigate the effects of noise exposure.MethodsOver four visits, participants (n = 30, NCT#: 03834714) with normal hearing completed baseline hearing health assessments followed by exposure to open ear, continuous pink noise at 94 dBA for 15 min. Immediately thereafter, post-noise hearing tests at 3000, 4000, and 6000 Hz and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) were conducted along with the Modified Rhyme Test (MRT), Masking Level Difference Test (MLD), and Fixed Level Frequency Tests (FLFT) [collectively referred to as the Central and Peripheral Auditory Test Battery (CPATB)] to acquire baseline noise sensitivity profiles. Participants were then randomized to either Active or Sham NIR light therapy for 30 min binaurally to conclude Visit 1. Visit 2 (≥24 and ≤ 48 h from Visit 1) began with an additional 30-min session of Active NIR light therapy or Sham followed by repeat CPATB testing and noise exposure. Post-noise testing was again conducted immediately after noise exposure to assess the effect of NIR light therapy. The remaining visits were conducted following ≥2 weeks of noise rest in a cross-over design (i.e., those who had received Active NIR light therapy in Visits 1 and 2 received Sham therapy in Visits 3 and 4).ResultsRecovery hearing tests and DPOAEs were completed at the end of each visit. Participants experienced temporary threshold shifts (TTS) immediately following noise exposure, with a mean shift of 6.79 dB HL (±6.25), 10.61 dB HL (±6.89), and 7.30 dB HL (±7.25) at 3000, 4000, and 6000 Hz, respectively, though all thresholds returned to baseline at 3000, 4000, and 6000 Hz within 75 min of noise exposure. Paradoxically, Active NIR light therapy threshold shifts were statistically higher than Sham therapy at 3000 Hz (p = 0.04), but no other differences were observed at the other frequencies tested. An age sub-analysis demonstrated that TTS among younger adults were generally larger in the Sham therapy group versus Active therapy, though this was not statistically different. There were no differences in CPATB test results across Active or Sham groups. Finally, we observed no changes in auditory function or central processing following noise exposure, suggestive of healthy and resilient inner ears.ConclusionIn this study, locally administered NIR prior to noise exposure did not induce a significant protective effect in mitigating noise-induced TTS. Further exploration is needed to implement effective dosage and administration for this promising otoprotective therapy.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2024.1366239/fullnear-infrared lightnoise-induced hearing losstemporary threshold shiftauditory therapeuticsauditory health
spellingShingle Erin Williams
Erin Williams
Erin Williams
Kayla Minesinger
Kayla Minesinger
Hilary Gallagher
J. R. Stefanson
Nathaniel Bridges
Natalie Jackson
Valerie Stark
Jennifer Coto
Suhrud Rajguru
Suhrud Rajguru
Kurt Yankaskas
Rick Rogers
Michael E. Hoffer
Michael E. Hoffer
Examining the utility of near infrared light as pre-exposure therapy to mitigate temporary noise-induced hearing loss in humans
Frontiers in Neurology
near-infrared light
noise-induced hearing loss
temporary threshold shift
auditory therapeutics
auditory health
title Examining the utility of near infrared light as pre-exposure therapy to mitigate temporary noise-induced hearing loss in humans
title_full Examining the utility of near infrared light as pre-exposure therapy to mitigate temporary noise-induced hearing loss in humans
title_fullStr Examining the utility of near infrared light as pre-exposure therapy to mitigate temporary noise-induced hearing loss in humans
title_full_unstemmed Examining the utility of near infrared light as pre-exposure therapy to mitigate temporary noise-induced hearing loss in humans
title_short Examining the utility of near infrared light as pre-exposure therapy to mitigate temporary noise-induced hearing loss in humans
title_sort examining the utility of near infrared light as pre exposure therapy to mitigate temporary noise induced hearing loss in humans
topic near-infrared light
noise-induced hearing loss
temporary threshold shift
auditory therapeutics
auditory health
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2024.1366239/full
work_keys_str_mv AT erinwilliams examiningtheutilityofnearinfraredlightaspreexposuretherapytomitigatetemporarynoiseinducedhearinglossinhumans
AT erinwilliams examiningtheutilityofnearinfraredlightaspreexposuretherapytomitigatetemporarynoiseinducedhearinglossinhumans
AT erinwilliams examiningtheutilityofnearinfraredlightaspreexposuretherapytomitigatetemporarynoiseinducedhearinglossinhumans
AT kaylaminesinger examiningtheutilityofnearinfraredlightaspreexposuretherapytomitigatetemporarynoiseinducedhearinglossinhumans
AT kaylaminesinger examiningtheutilityofnearinfraredlightaspreexposuretherapytomitigatetemporarynoiseinducedhearinglossinhumans
AT hilarygallagher examiningtheutilityofnearinfraredlightaspreexposuretherapytomitigatetemporarynoiseinducedhearinglossinhumans
AT jrstefanson examiningtheutilityofnearinfraredlightaspreexposuretherapytomitigatetemporarynoiseinducedhearinglossinhumans
AT nathanielbridges examiningtheutilityofnearinfraredlightaspreexposuretherapytomitigatetemporarynoiseinducedhearinglossinhumans
AT nataliejackson examiningtheutilityofnearinfraredlightaspreexposuretherapytomitigatetemporarynoiseinducedhearinglossinhumans
AT valeriestark examiningtheutilityofnearinfraredlightaspreexposuretherapytomitigatetemporarynoiseinducedhearinglossinhumans
AT jennifercoto examiningtheutilityofnearinfraredlightaspreexposuretherapytomitigatetemporarynoiseinducedhearinglossinhumans
AT suhrudrajguru examiningtheutilityofnearinfraredlightaspreexposuretherapytomitigatetemporarynoiseinducedhearinglossinhumans
AT suhrudrajguru examiningtheutilityofnearinfraredlightaspreexposuretherapytomitigatetemporarynoiseinducedhearinglossinhumans
AT kurtyankaskas examiningtheutilityofnearinfraredlightaspreexposuretherapytomitigatetemporarynoiseinducedhearinglossinhumans
AT rickrogers examiningtheutilityofnearinfraredlightaspreexposuretherapytomitigatetemporarynoiseinducedhearinglossinhumans
AT michaelehoffer examiningtheutilityofnearinfraredlightaspreexposuretherapytomitigatetemporarynoiseinducedhearinglossinhumans
AT michaelehoffer examiningtheutilityofnearinfraredlightaspreexposuretherapytomitigatetemporarynoiseinducedhearinglossinhumans