Comparison of different methods for evaluating resin composite restorations in posterior teeth
Aim: To compare different methods for evaluating composite resin restorations in posterior teeth and to evaluate the reliability of each method by determining the intraobserver agreement. Material and methods: 136 class I resin composite restorations were evaluated by a trained examiner using modi...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Faculdade de Odontologia
2012-11-01
|
| Series: | Revista da Faculdade de Odontologia de Porto Alegre |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://seer.ufrgs.br/RevistadaFaculdadeOdontologia/article/view/30469 |
| _version_ | 1818649593873694720 |
|---|---|
| author | Karina Podestá Juliana Jobim Jardim Maurício dos Santos Moura Marisa Maltz |
| author_facet | Karina Podestá Juliana Jobim Jardim Maurício dos Santos Moura Marisa Maltz |
| author_sort | Karina Podestá |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Aim: To compare different methods for evaluating composite resin restorations in posterior teeth and to evaluate the reliability of each method by determining the intraobserver agreement.
Material and methods: 136 class I resin composite restorations were evaluated by a trained examiner using modified Ryge criteria to assess selected restoration characteristics with three different methods: clinical, photographic and dental cast models.
Results: The results showed that intraexaminer agreement was better on dental cast models evaluations for marginal integrity and anatomic form and was similar between photographic and clinical evaluations for marginal integrity and marginal discoloration. Surface texture showed the lowest degree of intraexaminer agreement with all the methods tested. Direct clinical method and the two indirect methods were significantly different for all the characteristics assessed (p |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-17T01:36:48Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-bed21bef926247708a0829d2036021f6 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0566-1854 2177-0018 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-17T01:36:48Z |
| publishDate | 2012-11-01 |
| publisher | Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Faculdade de Odontologia |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Revista da Faculdade de Odontologia de Porto Alegre |
| spelling | doaj.art-bed21bef926247708a0829d2036021f62022-12-21T22:08:26ZengUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Faculdade de OdontologiaRevista da Faculdade de Odontologia de Porto Alegre0566-18542177-00182012-11-01531212610.22456/2177-0018.3046920646Comparison of different methods for evaluating resin composite restorations in posterior teethKarina Podestá0Juliana Jobim Jardim1Maurício dos Santos Moura2Marisa Maltz3UFRGSUFRGSUFRGSUFRGSAim: To compare different methods for evaluating composite resin restorations in posterior teeth and to evaluate the reliability of each method by determining the intraobserver agreement. Material and methods: 136 class I resin composite restorations were evaluated by a trained examiner using modified Ryge criteria to assess selected restoration characteristics with three different methods: clinical, photographic and dental cast models. Results: The results showed that intraexaminer agreement was better on dental cast models evaluations for marginal integrity and anatomic form and was similar between photographic and clinical evaluations for marginal integrity and marginal discoloration. Surface texture showed the lowest degree of intraexaminer agreement with all the methods tested. Direct clinical method and the two indirect methods were significantly different for all the characteristics assessed (phttps://seer.ufrgs.br/RevistadaFaculdadeOdontologia/article/view/30469resina composta, superfície oclusal, critério usphs, ensaio clínico. |
| spellingShingle | Karina Podestá Juliana Jobim Jardim Maurício dos Santos Moura Marisa Maltz Comparison of different methods for evaluating resin composite restorations in posterior teeth Revista da Faculdade de Odontologia de Porto Alegre resina composta, superfície oclusal, critério usphs, ensaio clínico. |
| title | Comparison of different methods for evaluating resin composite restorations in posterior teeth |
| title_full | Comparison of different methods for evaluating resin composite restorations in posterior teeth |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of different methods for evaluating resin composite restorations in posterior teeth |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of different methods for evaluating resin composite restorations in posterior teeth |
| title_short | Comparison of different methods for evaluating resin composite restorations in posterior teeth |
| title_sort | comparison of different methods for evaluating resin composite restorations in posterior teeth |
| topic | resina composta, superfície oclusal, critério usphs, ensaio clínico. |
| url | https://seer.ufrgs.br/RevistadaFaculdadeOdontologia/article/view/30469 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT karinapodesta comparisonofdifferentmethodsforevaluatingresincompositerestorationsinposteriorteeth AT julianajobimjardim comparisonofdifferentmethodsforevaluatingresincompositerestorationsinposteriorteeth AT mauriciodossantosmoura comparisonofdifferentmethodsforevaluatingresincompositerestorationsinposteriorteeth AT marisamaltz comparisonofdifferentmethodsforevaluatingresincompositerestorationsinposteriorteeth |