Social Kinds, Reference, and Meta-Ontological Revisionism

Julian Dodd has characterized the default position in metaphysics as meta-ontologically realist: the answers to first-order ontological questions are thought to be entirely independent of the things we say and think about the entities at issue. Consequently, folk ontologies are liable to substantial...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Xhignesse Michel-Antoine
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Vienna 2019-04-01
Series:Journal of Social Ontology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2018-0013
_version_ 1797707077154504704
author Xhignesse Michel-Antoine
author_facet Xhignesse Michel-Antoine
author_sort Xhignesse Michel-Antoine
collection DOAJ
description Julian Dodd has characterized the default position in metaphysics as meta-ontologically realist: the answers to first-order ontological questions are thought to be entirely independent of the things we say and think about the entities at issue. Consequently, folk ontologies are liable to substantial error. But while this epistemic humility is commendable where the ontology of natural kinds is concerned, it seems misplaced with respect to social kinds since their ontology is dependent upon the human social world. Using art and art-kinds as paradigmatic examples of social kinds, I argue that meta-ontological realism sets conditions that are too strict to apply to social kinds. Nevertheless, I argue that we should not be too quick to embrace the conclusion that our folk theories of social kinds cannot err substantially. By modelling the reference of social kind-terms on that of natural kind-terms, it becomes clear that in both cases, our sole epistemic privilege lies in our ability to pinpoint the subject of our inquiries.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T06:02:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bed2289359d7479d9222538dee15b840
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2196-9655
2196-9663
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T06:02:06Z
publishDate 2019-04-01
publisher University of Vienna
record_format Article
series Journal of Social Ontology
spelling doaj.art-bed2289359d7479d9222538dee15b8402023-09-03T04:06:14ZengUniversity of ViennaJournal of Social Ontology2196-96552196-96632019-04-014213715610.1515/jso-2018-0013jso-2018-0013Social Kinds, Reference, and Meta-Ontological RevisionismXhignesse Michel-Antoine0Department of Philosophy, University of British Columbia, 1866 Main Mall, Buchanan E370, Vancouver, CanadaJulian Dodd has characterized the default position in metaphysics as meta-ontologically realist: the answers to first-order ontological questions are thought to be entirely independent of the things we say and think about the entities at issue. Consequently, folk ontologies are liable to substantial error. But while this epistemic humility is commendable where the ontology of natural kinds is concerned, it seems misplaced with respect to social kinds since their ontology is dependent upon the human social world. Using art and art-kinds as paradigmatic examples of social kinds, I argue that meta-ontological realism sets conditions that are too strict to apply to social kinds. Nevertheless, I argue that we should not be too quick to embrace the conclusion that our folk theories of social kinds cannot err substantially. By modelling the reference of social kind-terms on that of natural kind-terms, it becomes clear that in both cases, our sole epistemic privilege lies in our ability to pinpoint the subject of our inquiries.https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2018-0013art-kindsnatural kindsreferencefolk-theoretic modestyrevisionismdescriptivismsocial kindsmeta-ontological realism
spellingShingle Xhignesse Michel-Antoine
Social Kinds, Reference, and Meta-Ontological Revisionism
Journal of Social Ontology
art-kinds
natural kinds
reference
folk-theoretic modesty
revisionism
descriptivism
social kinds
meta-ontological realism
title Social Kinds, Reference, and Meta-Ontological Revisionism
title_full Social Kinds, Reference, and Meta-Ontological Revisionism
title_fullStr Social Kinds, Reference, and Meta-Ontological Revisionism
title_full_unstemmed Social Kinds, Reference, and Meta-Ontological Revisionism
title_short Social Kinds, Reference, and Meta-Ontological Revisionism
title_sort social kinds reference and meta ontological revisionism
topic art-kinds
natural kinds
reference
folk-theoretic modesty
revisionism
descriptivism
social kinds
meta-ontological realism
url https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2018-0013
work_keys_str_mv AT xhignessemichelantoine socialkindsreferenceandmetaontologicalrevisionism