Evaluation of time to reimplantation as a risk factor in two-stage revision with static spacers for periprosthetic knee joint infection

Abstract Introduction We investigated the time to reimplantation (TTR) during two-stage revision using static spacers with regard to treatment success and function in patients with chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the knee. Methods 163 patients (median age 72 years, 72 women) who unde...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jan Puetzler, Marc Hofschneider, Georg Gosheger, Christoph Theil, Martin Schulze, Jan Schwarze, Raphael Koch, Burkhard Moellenbeck
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2024-03-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-024-00745-7
_version_ 1797233416574337024
author Jan Puetzler
Marc Hofschneider
Georg Gosheger
Christoph Theil
Martin Schulze
Jan Schwarze
Raphael Koch
Burkhard Moellenbeck
author_facet Jan Puetzler
Marc Hofschneider
Georg Gosheger
Christoph Theil
Martin Schulze
Jan Schwarze
Raphael Koch
Burkhard Moellenbeck
author_sort Jan Puetzler
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction We investigated the time to reimplantation (TTR) during two-stage revision using static spacers with regard to treatment success and function in patients with chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the knee. Methods 163 patients (median age 72 years, 72 women) who underwent two-stage exchange for chronic knee PJI between 2012 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed (based on the 2011 Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria). A cutoff TTR for increased risk of reinfection was identified using the maximally selected log-rank statistic. Infection control, aseptic revisions and overall survival were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier survival estimates. Adjustment for confounding factors—the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and C-reactive protein (CRP)—was done with a Cox proportional hazards model. Results When TTR exceeded 94 days, the adjusted hazard of reinfection was increased 2.8-fold (95% CI 1.4–5.7; p = 0.0036). The reinfection-free rate was 67% (95% CI 52-79%) after 2 years and 33% (95% CI 11–57%) after 5 years for a longer TTR compared to 89% (95% CI 81–94%) and 80% (95% CI 69–87%) at 2 and 5 years, respectively, for a shorter TTR. Adjusted overall survival and number of aseptic revisions did not differ between the longer TTR and shorter TTR groups. Maximum knee flexion was 90° (IQR 84–100) for a longer TTR and 95° (IQR 90–100) for a shorter TTR (p = 0.0431), with no difference between the groups in Oxford Knee Score. Baseline characteristics were similar (body mass index, age, previous surgeries, microorganisms) for the two groups, except that there was a higher CCI (median 4 vs. 3) and higher CRP (median 3.7 vs 2.6 mg/dl) in the longer TTR group. Conclusion A long TTR is sometimes unavoidable in clinical practice, but surgeons should be aware of a potentially higher risk of reinfection. Level of evidence: III, retrospective comparative study.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T16:15:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bee6673d8fb043f29c7fcdd763a21f22
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1590-9999
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T16:15:49Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
spelling doaj.art-bee6673d8fb043f29c7fcdd763a21f222024-03-31T11:28:39ZengSpringerOpenJournal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology1590-99992024-03-0125111110.1186/s10195-024-00745-7Evaluation of time to reimplantation as a risk factor in two-stage revision with static spacers for periprosthetic knee joint infectionJan Puetzler0Marc Hofschneider1Georg Gosheger2Christoph Theil3Martin Schulze4Jan Schwarze5Raphael Koch6Burkhard Moellenbeck7Department of Orthopaedics and Tumor Orthopaedics, Muenster University HospitalDepartment of Orthopaedics and Tumor Orthopaedics, Muenster University HospitalDepartment of Orthopaedics and Tumor Orthopaedics, Muenster University HospitalDepartment of Orthopaedics and Tumor Orthopaedics, Muenster University HospitalDepartment of Orthopaedics and Tumor Orthopaedics, Muenster University HospitalDepartment of Orthopaedics and Tumor Orthopaedics, Muenster University HospitalInstitute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of MuensterDepartment of Orthopaedics and Tumor Orthopaedics, Muenster University HospitalAbstract Introduction We investigated the time to reimplantation (TTR) during two-stage revision using static spacers with regard to treatment success and function in patients with chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the knee. Methods 163 patients (median age 72 years, 72 women) who underwent two-stage exchange for chronic knee PJI between 2012 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed (based on the 2011 Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria). A cutoff TTR for increased risk of reinfection was identified using the maximally selected log-rank statistic. Infection control, aseptic revisions and overall survival were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier survival estimates. Adjustment for confounding factors—the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and C-reactive protein (CRP)—was done with a Cox proportional hazards model. Results When TTR exceeded 94 days, the adjusted hazard of reinfection was increased 2.8-fold (95% CI 1.4–5.7; p = 0.0036). The reinfection-free rate was 67% (95% CI 52-79%) after 2 years and 33% (95% CI 11–57%) after 5 years for a longer TTR compared to 89% (95% CI 81–94%) and 80% (95% CI 69–87%) at 2 and 5 years, respectively, for a shorter TTR. Adjusted overall survival and number of aseptic revisions did not differ between the longer TTR and shorter TTR groups. Maximum knee flexion was 90° (IQR 84–100) for a longer TTR and 95° (IQR 90–100) for a shorter TTR (p = 0.0431), with no difference between the groups in Oxford Knee Score. Baseline characteristics were similar (body mass index, age, previous surgeries, microorganisms) for the two groups, except that there was a higher CCI (median 4 vs. 3) and higher CRP (median 3.7 vs 2.6 mg/dl) in the longer TTR group. Conclusion A long TTR is sometimes unavoidable in clinical practice, but surgeons should be aware of a potentially higher risk of reinfection. Level of evidence: III, retrospective comparative study.https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-024-00745-7Prosthetic joint infectionTwo-stage exchange revision arthroplastyTKATHA
spellingShingle Jan Puetzler
Marc Hofschneider
Georg Gosheger
Christoph Theil
Martin Schulze
Jan Schwarze
Raphael Koch
Burkhard Moellenbeck
Evaluation of time to reimplantation as a risk factor in two-stage revision with static spacers for periprosthetic knee joint infection
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Prosthetic joint infection
Two-stage exchange revision arthroplasty
TKA
THA
title Evaluation of time to reimplantation as a risk factor in two-stage revision with static spacers for periprosthetic knee joint infection
title_full Evaluation of time to reimplantation as a risk factor in two-stage revision with static spacers for periprosthetic knee joint infection
title_fullStr Evaluation of time to reimplantation as a risk factor in two-stage revision with static spacers for periprosthetic knee joint infection
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of time to reimplantation as a risk factor in two-stage revision with static spacers for periprosthetic knee joint infection
title_short Evaluation of time to reimplantation as a risk factor in two-stage revision with static spacers for periprosthetic knee joint infection
title_sort evaluation of time to reimplantation as a risk factor in two stage revision with static spacers for periprosthetic knee joint infection
topic Prosthetic joint infection
Two-stage exchange revision arthroplasty
TKA
THA
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-024-00745-7
work_keys_str_mv AT janpuetzler evaluationoftimetoreimplantationasariskfactorintwostagerevisionwithstaticspacersforperiprosthetickneejointinfection
AT marchofschneider evaluationoftimetoreimplantationasariskfactorintwostagerevisionwithstaticspacersforperiprosthetickneejointinfection
AT georggosheger evaluationoftimetoreimplantationasariskfactorintwostagerevisionwithstaticspacersforperiprosthetickneejointinfection
AT christophtheil evaluationoftimetoreimplantationasariskfactorintwostagerevisionwithstaticspacersforperiprosthetickneejointinfection
AT martinschulze evaluationoftimetoreimplantationasariskfactorintwostagerevisionwithstaticspacersforperiprosthetickneejointinfection
AT janschwarze evaluationoftimetoreimplantationasariskfactorintwostagerevisionwithstaticspacersforperiprosthetickneejointinfection
AT raphaelkoch evaluationoftimetoreimplantationasariskfactorintwostagerevisionwithstaticspacersforperiprosthetickneejointinfection
AT burkhardmoellenbeck evaluationoftimetoreimplantationasariskfactorintwostagerevisionwithstaticspacersforperiprosthetickneejointinfection