An AMSTAR assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of oral healthcare interventions published in the Journal of Applied Oral Science (JAOS)
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews are not an assembly of anecdotes but a distillation of current best available evidence on a particular topic and as such have an important role to play in evidence-based healthcare. A substantial proportion of these systematic reviews focus on interventions, and are ab...
Main Authors: | Patrick Sequeira-Byron, Zbys Fedorowicz, Vanitha A. Jagannath, Mohammad Owaise Sharif |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of São Paulo
2011-10-01
|
Series: | Journal of Applied Oral Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572011000500002 |
Similar Items
-
A Methodological Quality Assessment of Meta-Analysis Studies in Dance Therapy Using AMSTAR and AMSTAR 2
by: Hye-Ryeon Kim, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01) -
Evaluation of methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in veterinary journals with amstar
by: Ender UZABACI, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01) -
User experience of applying AMSTAR 2 to appraise systematic reviews of healthcare interventions: a commentary
by: Karina Karolina De Santis, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01) -
Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews of interventions aimed at improving vaccination coverage using AMSTAR and ROBIS checklists
by: Anelisa Jaca, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01) -
A Russian version of AMSTAR 2: validation and guidance
by: D. V. Kvashnina, et al.
Published: (2022-07-01)