Co-benefits of China’s climate policy for air quality and human health in China and transboundary regions in 2030

Climate policies targeting CO _2 emissions from fossil fuels can simultaneously reduce emissions of air pollutants and their precursors, thus mitigating air pollution and associated health impacts. Previous work has examined co-benefits of climate policy from reducing PM _2.5 in rapidly-developing c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mingwei Li, Da Zhang, Chiao-Ting Li, Noelle E Selin, Valerie J Karplus
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2019-01-01
Series:Environmental Research Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab26ca
_version_ 1797748086442819584
author Mingwei Li
Da Zhang
Chiao-Ting Li
Noelle E Selin
Valerie J Karplus
author_facet Mingwei Li
Da Zhang
Chiao-Ting Li
Noelle E Selin
Valerie J Karplus
author_sort Mingwei Li
collection DOAJ
description Climate policies targeting CO _2 emissions from fossil fuels can simultaneously reduce emissions of air pollutants and their precursors, thus mitigating air pollution and associated health impacts. Previous work has examined co-benefits of climate policy from reducing PM _2.5 in rapidly-developing countries such as China, but have not examined co-benefits from ozone and its transboundary impact for both PM _2.5 and ozone. Here, we compare the air quality and health co-benefits of China’s climate policy on both PM _2.5 and ozone in China to their co-benefits in three downwind and populous countries (South Korea, Japan and the United States) using a coupled modeling framework. In a policy scenario consistent with China’s pledge to peak CO _2 emissions in approximately 2030, avoided premature deaths from ozone reductions are 54 300 (95% confidence interval: 37 100–71 000) in China in 2030, nearly 60% of those from PM _2.5 . Total avoided premature deaths in South Korea, Japan, and the US are 1200 (900–1600), 3500 (2800–4300), and 1900 (1400–2500), respectively. Total avoided deaths in South Korea and Japan are dominated by reductions in PM _2.5 -related mortality, but ozone plays a more important role in the US. Similar to co-benefits for PM _2.5 in China, co-benefits of China’s policy for ozone and for both pollutants in those downwind countries also rise with increasing policy stringency.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T15:59:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bf03aef0d058401583b0e2c99b793097
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1748-9326
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T15:59:57Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series Environmental Research Letters
spelling doaj.art-bf03aef0d058401583b0e2c99b7930972023-08-09T14:41:48ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research Letters1748-93262019-01-0114808400610.1088/1748-9326/ab26caCo-benefits of China’s climate policy for air quality and human health in China and transboundary regions in 2030Mingwei Li0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1896-3484Da Zhang1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0790-9298Chiao-Ting Li2Noelle E Selin3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6396-5622Valerie J Karplus4https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5493-9150Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology , Cambridge, MA, United States of AmericaJoint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Massachusetts Institute of Technology , Cambridge, MA, United States of America; Institute of Energy, Environment and Economy, Tsinghua University , Beijing, People’s Republic of ChinaJoint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Massachusetts Institute of Technology , Cambridge, MA, United States of AmericaDepartment of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology , Cambridge, MA, United States of America; Institute for Data, Systems and Society, Massachusetts Institute of Technology , Cambridge, MA, United States of AmericaJoint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Massachusetts Institute of Technology , Cambridge, MA, United States of America; Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology , Cambridge, MA, United States of AmericaClimate policies targeting CO _2 emissions from fossil fuels can simultaneously reduce emissions of air pollutants and their precursors, thus mitigating air pollution and associated health impacts. Previous work has examined co-benefits of climate policy from reducing PM _2.5 in rapidly-developing countries such as China, but have not examined co-benefits from ozone and its transboundary impact for both PM _2.5 and ozone. Here, we compare the air quality and health co-benefits of China’s climate policy on both PM _2.5 and ozone in China to their co-benefits in three downwind and populous countries (South Korea, Japan and the United States) using a coupled modeling framework. In a policy scenario consistent with China’s pledge to peak CO _2 emissions in approximately 2030, avoided premature deaths from ozone reductions are 54 300 (95% confidence interval: 37 100–71 000) in China in 2030, nearly 60% of those from PM _2.5 . Total avoided premature deaths in South Korea, Japan, and the US are 1200 (900–1600), 3500 (2800–4300), and 1900 (1400–2500), respectively. Total avoided deaths in South Korea and Japan are dominated by reductions in PM _2.5 -related mortality, but ozone plays a more important role in the US. Similar to co-benefits for PM _2.5 in China, co-benefits of China’s policy for ozone and for both pollutants in those downwind countries also rise with increasing policy stringency.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab26caclimate policyair qualityhuman healthco-benefitstransboundary air pollution
spellingShingle Mingwei Li
Da Zhang
Chiao-Ting Li
Noelle E Selin
Valerie J Karplus
Co-benefits of China’s climate policy for air quality and human health in China and transboundary regions in 2030
Environmental Research Letters
climate policy
air quality
human health
co-benefits
transboundary air pollution
title Co-benefits of China’s climate policy for air quality and human health in China and transboundary regions in 2030
title_full Co-benefits of China’s climate policy for air quality and human health in China and transboundary regions in 2030
title_fullStr Co-benefits of China’s climate policy for air quality and human health in China and transboundary regions in 2030
title_full_unstemmed Co-benefits of China’s climate policy for air quality and human health in China and transboundary regions in 2030
title_short Co-benefits of China’s climate policy for air quality and human health in China and transboundary regions in 2030
title_sort co benefits of china s climate policy for air quality and human health in china and transboundary regions in 2030
topic climate policy
air quality
human health
co-benefits
transboundary air pollution
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab26ca
work_keys_str_mv AT mingweili cobenefitsofchinasclimatepolicyforairqualityandhumanhealthinchinaandtransboundaryregionsin2030
AT dazhang cobenefitsofchinasclimatepolicyforairqualityandhumanhealthinchinaandtransboundaryregionsin2030
AT chiaotingli cobenefitsofchinasclimatepolicyforairqualityandhumanhealthinchinaandtransboundaryregionsin2030
AT noelleeselin cobenefitsofchinasclimatepolicyforairqualityandhumanhealthinchinaandtransboundaryregionsin2030
AT valeriejkarplus cobenefitsofchinasclimatepolicyforairqualityandhumanhealthinchinaandtransboundaryregionsin2030