Comparative in vitro evaluation of five Commelina forage species on ruminal fermentation and methanogenesis

In vitro gas measurement study was known to be a helpful tool for investigating the nutritional quality of feed for ruminant animals. This research was conducted to explore the ruminal fermentation and methane emission potential, and their variability pattern with changing seasons and altitudes for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kebede Gelgelo, Yisehak Kechero, Dereje Andualem
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-12-01
Series:Heliyon
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844023099772
_version_ 1797383958495756288
author Kebede Gelgelo
Yisehak Kechero
Dereje Andualem
author_facet Kebede Gelgelo
Yisehak Kechero
Dereje Andualem
author_sort Kebede Gelgelo
collection DOAJ
description In vitro gas measurement study was known to be a helpful tool for investigating the nutritional quality of feed for ruminant animals. This research was conducted to explore the ruminal fermentation and methane emission potential, and their variability pattern with changing seasons and altitudes for Commelina species, using in vitro test. Samples of the species were collected from different altitudes and seasons and used for the in vitro degradability study. Five species (C.africana, C. albescence, C. benghalensis, C. imberbis and C. diffusa), two altitudes (low and mid), and two seasons (wet and dry) were arranged in a 5 × 2 x 2 factorial manner in a completely randomized design, with three repeats of each treatment. In vitro gas and methane production as well as methane to total gas ratio were all meaningfully (P < 0.001) affected by season and altitude with the highest values observed in wet season and mid altitudes. At 24 h incubation, 44.76 and 37.82 ml/200 mg DM of total gas production was noted for wet and dry seasons respectively, while 39.77 and 47.38 ml/200 mg DM was recorded for low and mid altitudes respectively. Average gas production from immediately fermentable fractions (a) for wet season (4.21 ml) was reasonably (P < 0.001) higher than those for dry season (2.16 ml). Midlands (5.04 ml) had higher (P < 0.001) ‘a’ value than lowlands (2.77 ml). Both methane production and methane to total gas ratio exhibited a tangible decrease (P < 0.001) from wet season to dry season. 4.88 ml/200 mg DM and 6.52 ml/200 mg DM methane records were recorded for lowlands and midlands respectively. It appears that Commelina species contain nutrients that degrade in vitro, highlighting their potential supplement value for animals. The promising gas production potential added to its low methanogenic coefficient relative to the other species makes C. diffusa to the preferred supplement for poor-quality roughages followed by C. benghalensis and C. imberbis and the rest species being least preferred. But further nutrient analysis, minerals, secondary metabolites and the like, was required. And, in vivo trials must be conducted to strengthen the implications of this study.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T21:28:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bf0eb98565b44f6dbeb5e95cfa73a013
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2405-8440
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T21:28:32Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Heliyon
spelling doaj.art-bf0eb98565b44f6dbeb5e95cfa73a0132023-12-21T07:34:35ZengElsevierHeliyon2405-84402023-12-01912e22769Comparative in vitro evaluation of five Commelina forage species on ruminal fermentation and methanogenesisKebede Gelgelo0Yisehak Kechero1Dereje Andualem2Arba Minch University, College of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Sciences, P O Box 21, Gamo Zone, Arba Mincch, Ethiopia; Corresponding author.Arba Minch University, College of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Sciences, P O Box 21, Gamo Zone, Arba Mincch, EthiopiaDilla University, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Department of Animal and Range Sciences, P O Box 419, Gedeo Zone, Dilla, EthiopiaIn vitro gas measurement study was known to be a helpful tool for investigating the nutritional quality of feed for ruminant animals. This research was conducted to explore the ruminal fermentation and methane emission potential, and their variability pattern with changing seasons and altitudes for Commelina species, using in vitro test. Samples of the species were collected from different altitudes and seasons and used for the in vitro degradability study. Five species (C.africana, C. albescence, C. benghalensis, C. imberbis and C. diffusa), two altitudes (low and mid), and two seasons (wet and dry) were arranged in a 5 × 2 x 2 factorial manner in a completely randomized design, with three repeats of each treatment. In vitro gas and methane production as well as methane to total gas ratio were all meaningfully (P < 0.001) affected by season and altitude with the highest values observed in wet season and mid altitudes. At 24 h incubation, 44.76 and 37.82 ml/200 mg DM of total gas production was noted for wet and dry seasons respectively, while 39.77 and 47.38 ml/200 mg DM was recorded for low and mid altitudes respectively. Average gas production from immediately fermentable fractions (a) for wet season (4.21 ml) was reasonably (P < 0.001) higher than those for dry season (2.16 ml). Midlands (5.04 ml) had higher (P < 0.001) ‘a’ value than lowlands (2.77 ml). Both methane production and methane to total gas ratio exhibited a tangible decrease (P < 0.001) from wet season to dry season. 4.88 ml/200 mg DM and 6.52 ml/200 mg DM methane records were recorded for lowlands and midlands respectively. It appears that Commelina species contain nutrients that degrade in vitro, highlighting their potential supplement value for animals. The promising gas production potential added to its low methanogenic coefficient relative to the other species makes C. diffusa to the preferred supplement for poor-quality roughages followed by C. benghalensis and C. imberbis and the rest species being least preferred. But further nutrient analysis, minerals, secondary metabolites and the like, was required. And, in vivo trials must be conducted to strengthen the implications of this study.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844023099772Altitudinal dynamicsCommelina speciesGas productionKonsoMethaneSeasonal dynamics
spellingShingle Kebede Gelgelo
Yisehak Kechero
Dereje Andualem
Comparative in vitro evaluation of five Commelina forage species on ruminal fermentation and methanogenesis
Heliyon
Altitudinal dynamics
Commelina species
Gas production
Konso
Methane
Seasonal dynamics
title Comparative in vitro evaluation of five Commelina forage species on ruminal fermentation and methanogenesis
title_full Comparative in vitro evaluation of five Commelina forage species on ruminal fermentation and methanogenesis
title_fullStr Comparative in vitro evaluation of five Commelina forage species on ruminal fermentation and methanogenesis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative in vitro evaluation of five Commelina forage species on ruminal fermentation and methanogenesis
title_short Comparative in vitro evaluation of five Commelina forage species on ruminal fermentation and methanogenesis
title_sort comparative in vitro evaluation of five commelina forage species on ruminal fermentation and methanogenesis
topic Altitudinal dynamics
Commelina species
Gas production
Konso
Methane
Seasonal dynamics
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844023099772
work_keys_str_mv AT kebedegelgelo comparativeinvitroevaluationoffivecommelinaforagespeciesonruminalfermentationandmethanogenesis
AT yisehakkechero comparativeinvitroevaluationoffivecommelinaforagespeciesonruminalfermentationandmethanogenesis
AT derejeandualem comparativeinvitroevaluationoffivecommelinaforagespeciesonruminalfermentationandmethanogenesis