Piver Type II vs. Type III Hysterectomy in the Treatment of Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: Midterm Follow-up Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Introduction: With the expansion of value-based medicine, we explore whether using type III hysterectomy to treat low-risk, early-stage cervical cancer constitutes overtreatment. In present study, we evaluate the midterm safety and postoperative quality of life of patients who underwent type II hyst...
Main Authors: | Hengzi Sun, Dongyan Cao, Keng Shen, Jiaxin Yang, Yang Xiang, Fengzhi Feng, Lingying Wu, Zhenyu Zhang, Bin Ling, Lei Song |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018-11-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Oncology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2018.00568/full |
Similar Items
-
Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy vs. open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer
by: Greg Marchand, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01) -
Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer
by: Phanida Jarruwale, et al.
Published: (2013-05-01) -
Comparative single-center study between modified laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer
by: Xuqing Li, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01) -
Laparoscopic, robotic and open method of radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review
by: Puliyath Geetha, et al.
Published: (2012-01-01) -
Evaluation of the efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for treating cervical cancer: a meta-analysis
by: Zhen Zeng, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01)