Burning mouth syndrome: A comparative cross-sectional study

Background and Aim: Burning mouth syndrome (BMS) may be defined as a burning sensation in the oral mucosa usually unaccompanied by clinical signs. Multiple conditions have been attributed to a burning sensation. The aim of this study was to determine the role of age and sex in BMS. Materials and Met...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maryam Rabiei, Ehsan Kazemnezhad Leili, Leili Alizadeh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2018-01-01
Series:Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2018;volume=9;issue=6;spage=256;epage=260;aulast=Rabiei
_version_ 1818305171312082944
author Maryam Rabiei
Ehsan Kazemnezhad Leili
Leili Alizadeh
author_facet Maryam Rabiei
Ehsan Kazemnezhad Leili
Leili Alizadeh
author_sort Maryam Rabiei
collection DOAJ
description Background and Aim: Burning mouth syndrome (BMS) may be defined as a burning sensation in the oral mucosa usually unaccompanied by clinical signs. Multiple conditions have been attributed to a burning sensation. The aim of this study was to determine the role of age and sex in BMS. Materials and Methods: A total of 195 consecutive patients with BMS and 95 healthy patients without burning sensation were recruited in this study. Patients with BMS had experienced oral, burning sensations for at least 6 months without oral clinical signs, and with a normal blood count. Multiple logistic regression analyses were utilized to define the main predictors. Results: Menopause, candidiasis, psychological disorders, job status, denture, and dry mouth were significantly frequent in BMS patients. Multivariate logistic regression indicated age (odds ratio (OR) =1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08–1.15, P < 0.0001) and sex (OR = 3.14, 95% CI: 1.4–6.7, P < 0.002) significantly increase the odds of BMS. Psychological disorders (OR = 3.39, 95% CI: 1.2–9.5, P < 0.02) and candidiasis remain as predictive factors. Ultimately, age was defined as a critical predictor. Moreover, we can therefore predict that a 60-year-old woman with psychological disorders is 25 times more likely to suffer from BMS than a man 10 years younger who has no psychological disorder. Conclusion: Age and sex were the main predictors in BMS. Psychological disorders and candidiasis were significantly associated with the occurrence of BMS.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T06:22:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bf14aee119a04511800b0763552f1126
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0976-237X
0976-2361
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T06:22:21Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
spelling doaj.art-bf14aee119a04511800b0763552f11262022-12-21T23:56:48ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsContemporary Clinical Dentistry0976-237X0976-23612018-01-019625626010.4103/ccd.ccd_175_18Burning mouth syndrome: A comparative cross-sectional studyMaryam RabieiEhsan Kazemnezhad LeiliLeili AlizadehBackground and Aim: Burning mouth syndrome (BMS) may be defined as a burning sensation in the oral mucosa usually unaccompanied by clinical signs. Multiple conditions have been attributed to a burning sensation. The aim of this study was to determine the role of age and sex in BMS. Materials and Methods: A total of 195 consecutive patients with BMS and 95 healthy patients without burning sensation were recruited in this study. Patients with BMS had experienced oral, burning sensations for at least 6 months without oral clinical signs, and with a normal blood count. Multiple logistic regression analyses were utilized to define the main predictors. Results: Menopause, candidiasis, psychological disorders, job status, denture, and dry mouth were significantly frequent in BMS patients. Multivariate logistic regression indicated age (odds ratio (OR) =1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08–1.15, P < 0.0001) and sex (OR = 3.14, 95% CI: 1.4–6.7, P < 0.002) significantly increase the odds of BMS. Psychological disorders (OR = 3.39, 95% CI: 1.2–9.5, P < 0.02) and candidiasis remain as predictive factors. Ultimately, age was defined as a critical predictor. Moreover, we can therefore predict that a 60-year-old woman with psychological disorders is 25 times more likely to suffer from BMS than a man 10 years younger who has no psychological disorder. Conclusion: Age and sex were the main predictors in BMS. Psychological disorders and candidiasis were significantly associated with the occurrence of BMS.http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2018;volume=9;issue=6;spage=256;epage=260;aulast=RabieiBurning mouth syndromemouth diseaserisk factors
spellingShingle Maryam Rabiei
Ehsan Kazemnezhad Leili
Leili Alizadeh
Burning mouth syndrome: A comparative cross-sectional study
Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
Burning mouth syndrome
mouth disease
risk factors
title Burning mouth syndrome: A comparative cross-sectional study
title_full Burning mouth syndrome: A comparative cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Burning mouth syndrome: A comparative cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Burning mouth syndrome: A comparative cross-sectional study
title_short Burning mouth syndrome: A comparative cross-sectional study
title_sort burning mouth syndrome a comparative cross sectional study
topic Burning mouth syndrome
mouth disease
risk factors
url http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2018;volume=9;issue=6;spage=256;epage=260;aulast=Rabiei
work_keys_str_mv AT maryamrabiei burningmouthsyndromeacomparativecrosssectionalstudy
AT ehsankazemnezhadleili burningmouthsyndromeacomparativecrosssectionalstudy
AT leilializadeh burningmouthsyndromeacomparativecrosssectionalstudy