Comparative water use by maize, perennial crops, restored prairie, and poplar trees in the US Midwest

Water use by plant communities across years of varying water availability indicates how terrestrial water balances will respond to climate change and variability as well as to land cover change. Perennial biofuel crops, likely grown mainly on marginal lands of limited water availability, provide an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S K Hamilton, M Z Hussain, A K Bhardwaj, B Basso, G P Robertson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2015-01-01
Series:Environmental Research Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/6/064015
_version_ 1797748787777634304
author S K Hamilton
M Z Hussain
A K Bhardwaj
B Basso
G P Robertson
author_facet S K Hamilton
M Z Hussain
A K Bhardwaj
B Basso
G P Robertson
author_sort S K Hamilton
collection DOAJ
description Water use by plant communities across years of varying water availability indicates how terrestrial water balances will respond to climate change and variability as well as to land cover change. Perennial biofuel crops, likely grown mainly on marginal lands of limited water availability, provide an example of a potentially extensive future land cover conversion. We measured growing-season evapotranspiration (ET) based on daily changes in soil profile water contents in five perennial systems—switchgrass, miscanthus, native grasses, restored prairie, and hybrid poplar—and in annual maize (corn) in a temperate humid climate (Michigan, USA). Three study years (2010, 2011 and 2013) had normal growing-season rainfall (480–610 mm) whereas 2012 was a drought year (210 mm). Over all four years, mean (±SEM) growing-season ET for perennial systems did not greatly differ from corn (496 ± 21 mm), averaging 559 (±14), 458 (±31), 573 (±37), 519 (±30), and 492 (±58) mm for switchgrass, miscanthus, native grasses, prairie, and poplar, respectively. Differences in biomass production largely determined variation in water use efficiency (WUE). Miscanthus had the highest WUE in both normal and drought years (52–67 and 43 kg dry biomass ha ^−1 mm ^−1 , respectively), followed by maize (40–59 and 29 kg ha ^−1 mm ^−1 ); the native grasses and prairie were lower and poplar was intermediate. That measured water use by perennial systems was similar to maize across normal and drought years contrasts with earlier modeling studies and suggests that rain-fed perennial biomass crops in this climate have little impact on landscape water balances, whether replacing rain-fed maize on arable lands or successional vegetation on marginal lands. Results also suggest that crop ET rates, and thus groundwater recharge, streamflow, and lake levels, may be less sensitive to climate change than has been assumed.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T16:09:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bf1b5304572d43beb2aa6b79b31fa314
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1748-9326
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T16:09:52Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series Environmental Research Letters
spelling doaj.art-bf1b5304572d43beb2aa6b79b31fa3142023-08-09T14:11:07ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research Letters1748-93262015-01-0110606401510.1088/1748-9326/10/6/064015Comparative water use by maize, perennial crops, restored prairie, and poplar trees in the US MidwestS K Hamilton0M Z Hussain1A K Bhardwaj2B Basso3G P Robertson4W.K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University , Hickory Corners, MI 49060, USA; Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University , East Lansing, MI 48824, USA; Department of Integrative Biology, Michigan State University , East Lansing, MI 48824, USAW.K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University , Hickory Corners, MI 49060, USA; Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University , East Lansing, MI 48824, USAW.K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University , Hickory Corners, MI 49060, USA; Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University , East Lansing, MI 48824, USA; Current address: Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Karnal 132001, HR, IndiaW.K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University , Hickory Corners, MI 49060, USA; Department of Geological Sciences, Michigan State University , East Lansing, MI 48824, USAW.K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University , Hickory Corners, MI 49060, USA; Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University , East Lansing, MI 48824, USA; Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University , East Lansing, MI 48824, USAWater use by plant communities across years of varying water availability indicates how terrestrial water balances will respond to climate change and variability as well as to land cover change. Perennial biofuel crops, likely grown mainly on marginal lands of limited water availability, provide an example of a potentially extensive future land cover conversion. We measured growing-season evapotranspiration (ET) based on daily changes in soil profile water contents in five perennial systems—switchgrass, miscanthus, native grasses, restored prairie, and hybrid poplar—and in annual maize (corn) in a temperate humid climate (Michigan, USA). Three study years (2010, 2011 and 2013) had normal growing-season rainfall (480–610 mm) whereas 2012 was a drought year (210 mm). Over all four years, mean (±SEM) growing-season ET for perennial systems did not greatly differ from corn (496 ± 21 mm), averaging 559 (±14), 458 (±31), 573 (±37), 519 (±30), and 492 (±58) mm for switchgrass, miscanthus, native grasses, prairie, and poplar, respectively. Differences in biomass production largely determined variation in water use efficiency (WUE). Miscanthus had the highest WUE in both normal and drought years (52–67 and 43 kg dry biomass ha ^−1 mm ^−1 , respectively), followed by maize (40–59 and 29 kg ha ^−1 mm ^−1 ); the native grasses and prairie were lower and poplar was intermediate. That measured water use by perennial systems was similar to maize across normal and drought years contrasts with earlier modeling studies and suggests that rain-fed perennial biomass crops in this climate have little impact on landscape water balances, whether replacing rain-fed maize on arable lands or successional vegetation on marginal lands. Results also suggest that crop ET rates, and thus groundwater recharge, streamflow, and lake levels, may be less sensitive to climate change than has been assumed.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/6/064015evapotranspirationgrasslandscropstreesbiofuelswater balance
spellingShingle S K Hamilton
M Z Hussain
A K Bhardwaj
B Basso
G P Robertson
Comparative water use by maize, perennial crops, restored prairie, and poplar trees in the US Midwest
Environmental Research Letters
evapotranspiration
grasslands
crops
trees
biofuels
water balance
title Comparative water use by maize, perennial crops, restored prairie, and poplar trees in the US Midwest
title_full Comparative water use by maize, perennial crops, restored prairie, and poplar trees in the US Midwest
title_fullStr Comparative water use by maize, perennial crops, restored prairie, and poplar trees in the US Midwest
title_full_unstemmed Comparative water use by maize, perennial crops, restored prairie, and poplar trees in the US Midwest
title_short Comparative water use by maize, perennial crops, restored prairie, and poplar trees in the US Midwest
title_sort comparative water use by maize perennial crops restored prairie and poplar trees in the us midwest
topic evapotranspiration
grasslands
crops
trees
biofuels
water balance
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/6/064015
work_keys_str_mv AT skhamilton comparativewaterusebymaizeperennialcropsrestoredprairieandpoplartreesintheusmidwest
AT mzhussain comparativewaterusebymaizeperennialcropsrestoredprairieandpoplartreesintheusmidwest
AT akbhardwaj comparativewaterusebymaizeperennialcropsrestoredprairieandpoplartreesintheusmidwest
AT bbasso comparativewaterusebymaizeperennialcropsrestoredprairieandpoplartreesintheusmidwest
AT gprobertson comparativewaterusebymaizeperennialcropsrestoredprairieandpoplartreesintheusmidwest