Sex Distinction in Digital Dermatoglyphic Patterns of Convicted Prisoners: A Comparative Cohort-Control Study

The present study intends to analyse sex distinction in digital dermatoglyphic patterns in convicted prisoners and compare them with a normal control group. For this purpose, a sample of 184 prisoners (149 males, 35 females) as well as 240 normal participants (male 120, female 120)were selected. The...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maninder Kaur, Mankamal Kaur, Preet Kamal, Jatinder Kaur
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: Naif University Publishing House 2019-12-01
Series:Arab Journal of Forensic Sciences & Forensic Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.nauss.edu.sa/index.php/AJFSFM/article/view/1080
_version_ 1827320067184918528
author Maninder Kaur
Mankamal Kaur
Preet Kamal
Jatinder Kaur
author_facet Maninder Kaur
Mankamal Kaur
Preet Kamal
Jatinder Kaur
author_sort Maninder Kaur
collection DOAJ
description The present study intends to analyse sex distinction in digital dermatoglyphic patterns in convicted prisoners and compare them with a normal control group. For this purpose, a sample of 184 prisoners (149 males, 35 females) as well as 240 normal participants (male 120, female 120)were selected. The prisoner cohort group selected for the study was convicted for the following offences: Section 302 IPC, 307 IPC, 376IPC, 363-364 IPC, 366 IPC, 323-26 IPC. Galton’s system of classification was followed to classify various dermatoglyphic patterns. In the male criminal cohort group, the overall frequency of loop patterns (56.51%) was maximum compared to the frequency of whorls (38.79%) and arches (4.7%), while males in the control group exhibited the highest frequency of whorls (48.25%) followed by loops (47.67%) and arches (4.08%). In females, loops were the most frequently occurring pattern, whereas arches were the least frequently seen pattern in both the criminal and cohort group. The frequency of arches was lowest in both the hands with higher fractional percentage in the radial side (thumb and index finger) of distoproximal axis as compared to ulnar side (ring finger and little finger) in both the groups. Pattern intensity index (13.40 vs 13.05), and furuhata’s index (69.35 vs 68.47) of the criminal males and females were found to be comparable, but the Dankmeijer’s index (12.11 vs 18.93) of the male criminals was lower than their female counterparts, thereby indicating a higher occurrence of arches in the female criminal cohort group.
first_indexed 2024-04-25T00:40:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bf388bdfd91b4bd683d2135414fa50c6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1658-6786
1658-6794
language Arabic
last_indexed 2024-04-25T00:40:01Z
publishDate 2019-12-01
publisher Naif University Publishing House
record_format Article
series Arab Journal of Forensic Sciences & Forensic Medicine
spelling doaj.art-bf388bdfd91b4bd683d2135414fa50c62024-03-12T12:27:58ZaraNaif University Publishing HouseArab Journal of Forensic Sciences & Forensic Medicine1658-67861658-67942019-12-011101403141110.26735/16586794.2019.030446Sex Distinction in Digital Dermatoglyphic Patterns of Convicted Prisoners: A Comparative Cohort-Control StudyManinder Kaur0Mankamal Kaur1Preet Kamal2Jatinder Kaur3Department of Anthropology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, IndiaDepartment of Anthropology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, IndiaDepartment of Economics, Post Graduate Government College for Girls, Chandigarh, India.Department of Anthropology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, IndiaThe present study intends to analyse sex distinction in digital dermatoglyphic patterns in convicted prisoners and compare them with a normal control group. For this purpose, a sample of 184 prisoners (149 males, 35 females) as well as 240 normal participants (male 120, female 120)were selected. The prisoner cohort group selected for the study was convicted for the following offences: Section 302 IPC, 307 IPC, 376IPC, 363-364 IPC, 366 IPC, 323-26 IPC. Galton’s system of classification was followed to classify various dermatoglyphic patterns. In the male criminal cohort group, the overall frequency of loop patterns (56.51%) was maximum compared to the frequency of whorls (38.79%) and arches (4.7%), while males in the control group exhibited the highest frequency of whorls (48.25%) followed by loops (47.67%) and arches (4.08%). In females, loops were the most frequently occurring pattern, whereas arches were the least frequently seen pattern in both the criminal and cohort group. The frequency of arches was lowest in both the hands with higher fractional percentage in the radial side (thumb and index finger) of distoproximal axis as compared to ulnar side (ring finger and little finger) in both the groups. Pattern intensity index (13.40 vs 13.05), and furuhata’s index (69.35 vs 68.47) of the criminal males and females were found to be comparable, but the Dankmeijer’s index (12.11 vs 18.93) of the male criminals was lower than their female counterparts, thereby indicating a higher occurrence of arches in the female criminal cohort group.https://journals.nauss.edu.sa/index.php/AJFSFM/article/view/1080forensic sciencecohort groupdermatoglyphic patternsprisoners
spellingShingle Maninder Kaur
Mankamal Kaur
Preet Kamal
Jatinder Kaur
Sex Distinction in Digital Dermatoglyphic Patterns of Convicted Prisoners: A Comparative Cohort-Control Study
Arab Journal of Forensic Sciences & Forensic Medicine
forensic science
cohort group
dermatoglyphic patterns
prisoners
title Sex Distinction in Digital Dermatoglyphic Patterns of Convicted Prisoners: A Comparative Cohort-Control Study
title_full Sex Distinction in Digital Dermatoglyphic Patterns of Convicted Prisoners: A Comparative Cohort-Control Study
title_fullStr Sex Distinction in Digital Dermatoglyphic Patterns of Convicted Prisoners: A Comparative Cohort-Control Study
title_full_unstemmed Sex Distinction in Digital Dermatoglyphic Patterns of Convicted Prisoners: A Comparative Cohort-Control Study
title_short Sex Distinction in Digital Dermatoglyphic Patterns of Convicted Prisoners: A Comparative Cohort-Control Study
title_sort sex distinction in digital dermatoglyphic patterns of convicted prisoners a comparative cohort control study
topic forensic science
cohort group
dermatoglyphic patterns
prisoners
url https://journals.nauss.edu.sa/index.php/AJFSFM/article/view/1080
work_keys_str_mv AT maninderkaur sexdistinctionindigitaldermatoglyphicpatternsofconvictedprisonersacomparativecohortcontrolstudy
AT mankamalkaur sexdistinctionindigitaldermatoglyphicpatternsofconvictedprisonersacomparativecohortcontrolstudy
AT preetkamal sexdistinctionindigitaldermatoglyphicpatternsofconvictedprisonersacomparativecohortcontrolstudy
AT jatinderkaur sexdistinctionindigitaldermatoglyphicpatternsofconvictedprisonersacomparativecohortcontrolstudy