Goal attainment scaling with older people in general practice: A feasibility study

Background: The impact of health problems on daily life and consequent treatment goals differ from person to person, particularly for older people with multiple health problems. Personalized care in general practice can help address these health problems, but evaluation of its effects remains diffic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sophie CE van Blijswijk, Jacobijn Gussekloo, Florentine M Heijmans, Annet W Wind, Wendy PJ den Elzen, Jeanet W Blom
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-11-01
Series:International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X2030014X
_version_ 1819319218803310592
author Sophie CE van Blijswijk
Jacobijn Gussekloo
Florentine M Heijmans
Annet W Wind
Wendy PJ den Elzen
Jeanet W Blom
author_facet Sophie CE van Blijswijk
Jacobijn Gussekloo
Florentine M Heijmans
Annet W Wind
Wendy PJ den Elzen
Jeanet W Blom
author_sort Sophie CE van Blijswijk
collection DOAJ
description Background: The impact of health problems on daily life and consequent treatment goals differ from person to person, particularly for older people with multiple health problems. Personalized care in general practice can help address these health problems, but evaluation of its effects remains difficult. In rehabilitation, a common approach to the evaluation of personalized care is Goal Attainment Scaling. This feasibility study assesses whether goal attainment scaling can also be applied to the evaluation of personal care for community-dwelling older people in general practice. Methods: General practices were invited to participate in this longitudinal, observational feasibility study. Practice nurses and general practitioners received training in care plans and goal attainment scaling. They were each asked to create care plans and goal attainment scales for patients (aged ≥75 years) and to carry out evaluations at three and six months. Professionals and patients both completed a short questionnaire to evaluate their experiences regarding the (dis)advantages of goal attainment scaling. Results: Professionals (n=10) and patients (n=23) were able to set goals and scales (n=57) for problems across five health domains (somatic, functional, social, psychological and communicative), but experienced difficulties formulating goals and corresponding goal attainment scaling levels. Reported benefits of goal attainment scaling were 1) important problems were addressed, 2) patients were involved and motivated to attain goals, and 3) evaluation was straightforward once a scale was created. Disadvantages were 1) difficult for older people, 2) time-consuming and complex for clinical practice. Conclusions: Goal attainment scaling shows potential benefit for clinical practice and general practice research in terms of the setting and evaluation of goals for community-dwelling older persons. Further research is needed to develop more standardized and less time-consuming goal attainment scaling methods.
first_indexed 2024-12-24T11:00:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bf4e61c1504347eea611f5384d1ae41f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-142X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-24T11:00:12Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances
spelling doaj.art-bf4e61c1504347eea611f5384d1ae41f2022-12-21T16:58:43ZengElsevierInternational Journal of Nursing Studies Advances2666-142X2021-11-013100015Goal attainment scaling with older people in general practice: A feasibility studySophie CE van Blijswijk0Jacobijn Gussekloo1Florentine M Heijmans2Annet W Wind3Wendy PJ den Elzen4Jeanet W Blom5Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Hippocratespad 21, Postzone V0-P, Postbus 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands; Corresponding author.Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Hippocratespad 21, Postzone V0-P, Postbus 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, section Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Hippocratespad 21, Postzone V0-P, Postbus 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the NetherlandsDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Hippocratespad 21, Postzone V0-P, Postbus 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the NetherlandsDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Hippocratespad 21, Postzone V0-P, Postbus 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the NetherlandsDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Hippocratespad 21, Postzone V0-P, Postbus 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the NetherlandsDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Hippocratespad 21, Postzone V0-P, Postbus 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the NetherlandsBackground: The impact of health problems on daily life and consequent treatment goals differ from person to person, particularly for older people with multiple health problems. Personalized care in general practice can help address these health problems, but evaluation of its effects remains difficult. In rehabilitation, a common approach to the evaluation of personalized care is Goal Attainment Scaling. This feasibility study assesses whether goal attainment scaling can also be applied to the evaluation of personal care for community-dwelling older people in general practice. Methods: General practices were invited to participate in this longitudinal, observational feasibility study. Practice nurses and general practitioners received training in care plans and goal attainment scaling. They were each asked to create care plans and goal attainment scales for patients (aged ≥75 years) and to carry out evaluations at three and six months. Professionals and patients both completed a short questionnaire to evaluate their experiences regarding the (dis)advantages of goal attainment scaling. Results: Professionals (n=10) and patients (n=23) were able to set goals and scales (n=57) for problems across five health domains (somatic, functional, social, psychological and communicative), but experienced difficulties formulating goals and corresponding goal attainment scaling levels. Reported benefits of goal attainment scaling were 1) important problems were addressed, 2) patients were involved and motivated to attain goals, and 3) evaluation was straightforward once a scale was created. Disadvantages were 1) difficult for older people, 2) time-consuming and complex for clinical practice. Conclusions: Goal attainment scaling shows potential benefit for clinical practice and general practice research in terms of the setting and evaluation of goals for community-dwelling older persons. Further research is needed to develop more standardized and less time-consuming goal attainment scaling methods.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X2030014XCare-action-planCommunity-dwelling older peopleEvaluation methodGeneral practiceGoal attainment scalingGoal setting
spellingShingle Sophie CE van Blijswijk
Jacobijn Gussekloo
Florentine M Heijmans
Annet W Wind
Wendy PJ den Elzen
Jeanet W Blom
Goal attainment scaling with older people in general practice: A feasibility study
International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances
Care-action-plan
Community-dwelling older people
Evaluation method
General practice
Goal attainment scaling
Goal setting
title Goal attainment scaling with older people in general practice: A feasibility study
title_full Goal attainment scaling with older people in general practice: A feasibility study
title_fullStr Goal attainment scaling with older people in general practice: A feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed Goal attainment scaling with older people in general practice: A feasibility study
title_short Goal attainment scaling with older people in general practice: A feasibility study
title_sort goal attainment scaling with older people in general practice a feasibility study
topic Care-action-plan
Community-dwelling older people
Evaluation method
General practice
Goal attainment scaling
Goal setting
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X2030014X
work_keys_str_mv AT sophiecevanblijswijk goalattainmentscalingwitholderpeopleingeneralpracticeafeasibilitystudy
AT jacobijngussekloo goalattainmentscalingwitholderpeopleingeneralpracticeafeasibilitystudy
AT florentinemheijmans goalattainmentscalingwitholderpeopleingeneralpracticeafeasibilitystudy
AT annetwwind goalattainmentscalingwitholderpeopleingeneralpracticeafeasibilitystudy
AT wendypjdenelzen goalattainmentscalingwitholderpeopleingeneralpracticeafeasibilitystudy
AT jeanetwblom goalattainmentscalingwitholderpeopleingeneralpracticeafeasibilitystudy